|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
brentspeak (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-08-11 09:35 AM Original message |
Editorial: Obama plan hastens the end of Social Security |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tarheel_Dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-08-11 09:37 AM Response to Original message |
1. >>>> |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Enrique (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-08-11 09:41 AM Response to Reply #1 |
4. goddamn that's obnoxious |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tarheel_Dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-08-11 10:02 AM Response to Reply #4 |
6. >>>> |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dionysus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-08-11 10:54 AM Response to Reply #6 |
20. you got me AGAIN! that's IT! you're goin down... PUT EM UP!1!1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CakeGrrl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-08-11 10:04 AM Response to Reply #4 |
7. Maybe some of these doomsday articles are simply laughable. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-08-11 10:08 AM Response to Reply #7 |
9. Deleted message |
Hutzpa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-08-11 10:15 AM Response to Reply #9 |
10. Please explain to the slow ones amongst us how is laughing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dionysus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-08-11 11:20 AM Response to Reply #4 |
23. . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Number23 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-08-11 06:19 PM Response to Reply #4 |
46. TarheelDem's posts reflect badly on OBAMA? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Peacetrain (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-08-11 06:40 PM Response to Reply #46 |
49. ROFL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigdarryl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-08-11 09:38 AM Response to Original message |
2. If Obama messes with Social Security HE'S DONE!!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
trueblue2007 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-08-11 11:21 AM Response to Reply #2 |
24. oh gees you people... the president is not going to end social security. media pundits are morons |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polmaven (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-08-11 02:55 PM Response to Reply #24 |
36. Worse than that!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SidDithers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-08-11 11:45 AM Response to Reply #2 |
28. And if he doesn't mess with it, we're going to PRETEND HE DID!!!!...nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Larkspur (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-08-11 09:39 AM Response to Original message |
3. I definitely agree. Obama prefers Reagan to FDR and that is the problem |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tarheel_Dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-08-11 02:48 PM Response to Reply #3 |
35. Ah, that's what Nader told us about Gore. Gore=Bush. Remember that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
frazzled (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-08-11 09:47 AM Response to Original message |
5. The same Editorial board that endorsed McCain in 08 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
brentspeak (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-08-11 10:16 AM Response to Reply #5 |
11. Which has apparently moved to the left ever since |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-08-11 12:26 PM Response to Reply #5 |
32. Well, when |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Whisp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-08-11 10:05 AM Response to Original message |
8. you should really look into who you use as a source |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hutzpa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-08-11 10:24 AM Response to Original message |
12. I will laugh at this too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jefferson_dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-08-11 10:27 AM Response to Reply #12 |
13. Convenient, huh? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tarheel_Dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-08-11 11:13 AM Response to Reply #13 |
22. >>>>> |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-08-11 10:30 AM Response to Reply #12 |
16. Deleted message |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-08-11 10:55 AM Response to Reply #16 |
21. Deleted message |
brentspeak (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-08-11 11:31 AM Response to Reply #12 |
26. "The timing is suspect" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bhikkhu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-08-11 10:27 AM Response to Original message |
14. Doom-mongering...raise the cap and its "fixed" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
brentspeak (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-08-11 11:29 AM Response to Reply #14 |
25. I wouldn't mind lowering the payroll tax if the cap were simultaneously raised/eliminated |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheKentuckian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-08-11 02:59 PM Response to Reply #14 |
37. How is this redistributing anything? Upper incomes get more benefit and the deal is unfunded. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bhikkhu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-09-11 09:43 AM Response to Reply #37 |
51. Payroll tax only comes from the first $106k of wages paid |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bornskeptic (951 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-08-11 10:30 AM Response to Original message |
15. Since the payroll tax holiday has no effect on the funding of Social Security |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
brentspeak (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-08-11 10:37 AM Response to Reply #15 |
18. Either you forgot to actually read the articles |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bornskeptic (951 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-08-11 11:58 AM Response to Reply #18 |
30. I read enough of the first article to see that it was idiotic. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jefferson_dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-08-11 10:32 AM Response to Original message |
17. ALERT: Right Wing Rag doesn't like Obama! --- "Sun Journal: McCain has credentials to lead nation" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
brentspeak (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-08-11 10:43 AM Response to Reply #17 |
19. Three years later: "Sun Journal: Republican plan for redistricting is far too radical" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JoePhilly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-08-11 11:39 AM Response to Original message |
27. If Obama plans to end social security ... he SUCKS at it!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
brentspeak (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-08-11 11:46 AM Response to Reply #27 |
29. December, 2010: Obama enacts payroll tax "holiday" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JoePhilly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-08-11 03:22 PM Response to Reply #29 |
39. Which of those cuts Social Security in any way ... ?????? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
woo me with science (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-08-11 03:51 PM Response to Reply #39 |
44. Obama put it on the table, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tarheel_Dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-08-11 01:04 PM Response to Reply #27 |
33. "manufactured" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JoePhilly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-08-11 03:25 PM Response to Reply #33 |
40. No other word for it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
woo me with science (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-08-11 03:46 PM Response to Reply #27 |
43. Bullshit. Social Security was never offered up before by any President to be used as a hostage, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Number23 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-08-11 06:21 PM Response to Reply #27 |
47. Go get'em, Joe! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Enthusiast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-08-11 11:59 AM Response to Original message |
31. Kicked and recommended! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-08-11 01:11 PM Response to Original message |
34. Deleted message |
woo me with science (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-08-11 03:16 PM Response to Original message |
38. He is the first President who has offered Social Security to be a hostage and a bargaining chip |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JoePhilly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-08-11 03:26 PM Response to Reply #38 |
41. Yea, the GOP would NEVER attack Social Security if not for Obama!!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
woo me with science (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-08-11 03:41 PM Response to Reply #41 |
42. What an irrelevant comment. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JoePhilly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-08-11 05:46 PM Response to Reply #42 |
45. You misspelled "accurate". nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
woo me with science (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-08-11 07:58 PM Response to Reply #45 |
50. I-R-R-E-L-E-V-A-N-T |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Autumn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-08-11 06:35 PM Response to Original message |
48. Well listening to his speech, this was right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Dec 27th 2024, 03:43 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC