|
Edited on Mon Sep-12-11 02:06 PM by JoePhilly
I have not seen the video, but I think I understand the message.
When I was young, my grandfather had a small construction company. And after a while, it passed to my father.
Most of the jobs were very small. My father needed a couple carpenters, a plumber, and electrician, maybe a few others. My father KNEW specific people, all independent, who did these jobs. Dealing with the Union created overhead costs.
First, the time spent dealing with the Union rep, who wanted something in return, and who thought my father need 5 more people than he needed.
Second, and this was the larger cost. The Union wanted to tell my father who would work the site. And so (1) my father could not hire people who he knew were great at what they did, but (2) the Union sent him their WORST employees because his jobs were SMALL.
I remember once when my father was able to get a contract to do renovations for what today would be "Hallmark Stores" in strip malls. To do each renovation, you need very few workers of the kinds I described. My father wanted to teach me the business, have me do some of all the jobs so that I understood them as well as he did.
He'd hire my teenage friends, and pay them well, to help with unskilled labor ... carry things, clean up, go get lunch for the crew.
The Unions attacked him on each and every point of this. Even having his "non-Union" son on site.
After this particular experience, my father stopped ALL commercial construction work and went into residential remodeling, working direct with the home owners.
For many small businesses that struggle, this is what they fear.
I know a Union guy who tried to start his own plumbing business, and quit for the same reason ... he said ... better to be IN the Union, then to try and work WITH the Union (the same one he was in).
I have no answer to this.
|