Planned parenthood opposes senate hcr bill

[dkf]

STATEMENT BY CECILE RICHARDS, PRESIDENT OF PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA,
ON PROPOSED ABORTION LANGUAGE IN THE SENATE MANAGER'S AMENDMENT:

"Planned Parenthood strongly opposes the new abortion language offered by Senator Ben Nelson in the manager's amendment. Last week, the Senate rejected harsh restrictions on abortion coverage, and it is a sad day when women's health is traded away for one vote.

"The Nelson language is essentially an abortion rider. It creates an unworkable system whereby individuals are required to write two separate checks each month, one for abortion care and one for everything else. There is no sound policy reason to require women to pay separately for their abortion coverage other than to try to shame them and draw attention to the abortion coverage. Moreover, it is highly unlikely that insurance companies will be willing to follow such an administratively cumbersome system, leaving tens of millions of women without abortion coverage.

"After the passage of the Stupak amendment in the House, we heard loud and clear from women across the country that they will not stand for the undermining of their rights and their access to benefits. This Nelson abortion check provision will no doubt create the same outrage, as women learn that they are being made second-class citizens when it comes to health care coverage.

"As many members of Congress and the president believe, Planned Parenthood does not think that health care reform is the forum to litigate abortion policy. Unfortunately, opponents continue to use abortion as a political wedge at every step of the reform process.

"There is no policy reason for this action, it is simply a political maneuver.  We understand that leaders in the Senate and the White House want to move the process forward, but given this provision, we have no choice but to oppose the Senate bill.  Planned Parenthood will now work with leaders to fix the abortion coverage language in conference."

[Phx_Dem]

1. Well that's shocking. n/t

[jonnyblitz]

2. libruls suck ,eh sparky?

:sarcasm:

[Colobo]

3. I understand their position.

Still, I'm happy the bill, as imperfect as it is, is going to pass.

[IndianaGreen]

4. FRAK the women. All that counts is Obama's photo op at the signing

More Change We Can Believe In!

[Hepburn]

13. +1

[Raine]

8. Throw the women under the bus

who cares as long as Obama claims a win. :sarcasm:

[Odin2005]

12. Yeah, those uppity women can just go it hell!

:sarcasm: :eyes:

[jefferson_dem]

5. Go for it.

n/t

[Bullet1987]

6. There's another enemy of the bill...number keeps going up

[krawhitham]

7. I guess so

It hurts their bottom line

[AzDar]

9. K & R

[Mass]

10. Given their mission, this makes a lot of sense that they would oppose.

Who could blame them?

[ClarkUSA]

16. "Planned Parenthood will now work with leaders to fix the abortion coverage language in conference."

They are alot more reasonable than many who were/are screaming "Kill the Bill".

[HughMoran]

11. Is the House language better or worse from their perspective?

I don't remember how these groups came down on the House bill.

[Progressive_Angel]

14. only 2 people support it

chris matthews and obama

[HughMoran]

17. Why would you say that?

I've yet to see a Democratic Congressperson against it - did you forget about our progressive Congresspeople?

[ClarkUSA]

15. Sen. Barbara Boxer supports the HCR bill because she's sure the bill will be changed in conference.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=433&topic_id=75939&mesg_id=75939

"Planned Parenthood will now work with leaders to fix the abortion coverage language in conference."

There ya go.

[styersc]

18. Right Wing Teabaggers!!!!!!

They hate the bill because is a black Muslim!!!!

[flpoljunkie]

19. No one is going to purchase separate 'abortion' coverage which means denial of legal health care.

Shame on all those who put placating pro-life voters above women's reproductive rights!