Bernie Sanders: Strengthen Social Security

[ProSense]

Strengthen Social Security

"Social Security is the most successful government program in our nation's history. For 76 years, through good times and bad, Social Security has paid out every benefit owed to every eligible American," Sen. Bernie Sanders on Wednesday told a Capitol press conference. He introduced legislation to keep the retirement program sound for another 75 years. "The most effective way to strengthen Social Security is to eliminate the cap on the payroll tax on income above $250,000. Right now, someone who earns $106,800 pays the same amount of money into Social Security as a billionaire. That makes no sense. The Keeping Our Social Security Promises Act will ensure the long-term solvency of Social Security without cutting benefits or raising taxes on the middle class."

Sanders's measure is cosponsored by Sens. Daniel Akaka, Patrick Leahy, Barbara Boxer, Claire McCaskill, Sheldon Whitehouse, Al Franken and Richard Blumenthal. Rep. Peter DeFazio introduced the companion bill in the House.

Under the proposed legislation, the wealthiest Americans would pay the same payroll tax already assessed on those with incomes up to $106,800 a year. Social Security officials have calculated that the simple change would keep the retirement program strong for another 75 years.

The legislation also follows through on a proposal that President Barack Obama made in 2008 when he was running for the White House.

Since it was signed into law 76 years ago, Social Security has kept millions of senior citizens, widows, widowers, orphans, and the disabled out of poverty. Before Social Security, about half of senior citizens lived in poverty. Today, less than 10 percent live in poverty and more than 53 million Americans receive retirement or disability benefits.

The most successful government program in our nation's history has not contributed one dime to the federal deficit. It has a $2.5 trillion surplus, and it can pay out every nickel owed to every eligible American for at least the next 25 years, according to the Social Security Administration. A recent report from the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office estimated that Social Security is in even better financial shape and can pay all promised benefits until 2038.

If McCaskill actually support this, there is no reason it shouldn't get 53 Democratic votes in the Senate.

[midnight]

1. Why do we have dems. like her whose support we have to question?

[zalinda]

2. Rahm n/t

[frazzled]

3. And no reason why Republicans won't filibuster it

Because they'll filibuster any bill that goes beyond naming a post office.

This is the crux of our national problem: there is no rational, good solution to anything they won't oppose.

[global1]

4. What About Those People That Between $106,899 & $250,000?......

What's the justification for not including them? If raising the cap for those above $250,000 keeps the program strong for another 75 years it seems to me if they just raised the cap across the board on all earners that it would keep the program strong permanently.

[JoePhilly]

5. Read the content in the link.

While 250k is a lot of money, its value is not the same across the country due to cost of living issues.

I'd like to see them raise the floor. Your first 20k is FREE ... and then tax everything above, that would be fair, we'd all get the same break.

Politically speaking, Obama promised to NOT raise taxes on those making UNDER 250k. And so Bernie knows that and is factoring it in.