Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Clarity - there IS coverage for adult uninsured with prior conditions within 90 days of passing

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
Phoebe Loosinhouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 07:04 AM
Original message
Clarity - there IS coverage for adult uninsured with prior conditions within 90 days of passing
http://democrats.senate.gov/reform/patient-protection-affordable-care-act.pdf
pages 41-48

Apparently the govenrment will contract with an insurer to create this pool.

You must have been uninsured for the six months prior. (Why insist on this? A lot of bad stuff and bankrupting bills can happen in six months)

It seems ok except for the six month delay AND the fact that the age factor can be 4X. That will probably price a lot of people out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Phoebe Loosinhouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 07:09 AM
Response to Original message
1. It's interesting when FACTS with a source get unrecc'd. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elocs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 08:31 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. No, what's interesting is that an OP is so important that the 1st response is about UnRecs. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
midnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 07:09 AM
Response to Original message
2. Good question. I don't know the answer. K&R so someone might explain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ima_sinnic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 07:14 AM
Response to Original message
3. since I've been uninsured for at least 15 years, I guess I need to stock up on vaseline (nt)
Edited on Sun Dec-20-09 07:15 AM by ima_sinnic
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phoebe Loosinhouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 07:17 AM
Response to Original message
4. An interesting question is do the uninsured w/ prior c's have the same mandate to buy the high risk
pool? I would have to think yes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eomer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 09:19 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. No, I believe the mandate begins 1/1/2014, which is when the high risk pool ends.
See "SEC. 5000A. REQUIREMENT TO MAINTAIN MINIMUM ESSENTIAL COVERAGE" on page 324 of the bill (same link as in your OP):

http://democrats.senate.gov/reform/patient-protection-affordable-care-act.pdf

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 05:04 AM
Response to Reply #4
14. No. High risk pools may be utterly useless, but at least they are not mandatory n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomClash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 07:32 AM
Response to Original message
5. I'm not sure
There's a "pool" but who funds it? What state in 2010 has the money to fund this? And what insurance carrier will deem the expected rate of return (profit) sufficient to underwrite this coverage?

Thanks for posting the bill.:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Telly Savalas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 09:24 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. If I'm reading it right, it looks like its solely funded by premiums of the participants
and subsidies from the Federal Government. It doesn't appear to be placing any additional strain on state governments' budgets.

I'm having difficulties deciphering the restrictions/guidance on the premiums and subsidies. The effectiveness of the program depends on these things though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eomer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 09:29 AM
Response to Reply #5
10. It is federally funded.
Edited on Sun Dec-20-09 09:32 AM by eomer
$5 billion funded initially, and the bill authorizes the Treasury Secretary to fund more if needed.

This is in the bill section referenced in the OP.

Edit to add: I agree with Telly Savalas that there is a premium paid by the insureds, which is based on standard rates of standard pools. The excess due to the high-risk nature of the insureds in the high-risk pool is paid by the federal government.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadesofgray Donating Member (350 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 09:17 AM
Response to Original message
7. This is not nearly good enough. It's a travesty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
11. Up to four times the regula premium?
Aren't we steamed about the premium period? Coverage that is too expensive is the same thing as no coverage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phoebe Loosinhouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. I agree with you completely.
Affordability will most likely turn out to be the Achilles heel of this plan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 05:03 AM
Response to Original message
13. High risk pools give you nothing but really shitty overpriced catastrophic coverage
People with medical conditions need help with ongoing costs, which this will not provide.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 07:49 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC