By Greg Sargent
When Ed Koch endorsed the Republican in New York’s ninth Congressional district a few weeks ago, leading to a surprise victory for the GOP in a heavily Jewish district, many proclaimed that a certain type of Jewish swing voter looked to be deserting Obama. After all, Koch had
specifically cited Obama’s alleged “open hostility to the State of Israel” as a reason to endorse the Republican.
But that was then. Koch has now
come out and endorsed Obama, specifically citing Obama’s cooperation with the Israeli military as a key reason:
The President should be praised for intervening with the Egyptian army to save the Israeli diplomatic personnel from physical assault and providing the Israeli military with bunker buster bombs, advanced military technology and providing military intelligence cooperation far exceeding his predecessors. I’m now on board the Obama Reelection Express.
<...>
Perhaps, but a few quick points. First, anyone who read too much into the signficance of Koch’s earlier criticism of Obama got played. Koch has been a go-to guy for whacking Democrats as allegedly soft on Israel for many years now. Indeed, Koch already has a well documented history of
criticizing Obama on Israel before coming around to supporting him. In 2008, Koch
spent weeks coyly refusing to reveal whether he would back Obama over John McCain — leading to reams of speculation that he would endorse the Republican, and bring many Jewish Americans with him — before finally coming out for Obama.
<...>
It’s absolutely true that Obama’s campaign views the defection of Jewish voters as a possibility they must take seriously. It would be malpractive if his campaign advisers didn’t prepare for every worst case scenario. Koch’s endorsement will likely drain some of the momentum out of the right’s perennial narrative about inevitable Jewish desertions, but given Koch’s unreliability and affection for game-playing, it won’t diminish the campaign’s vigilence on this front, as well it shouldn’t.