|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
Better Believe It (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-20-09 02:24 PM Original message |
President Obama says Leiberman/Nelson "compromise" amendments make healthcare bill "even stronger"! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
4dsc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-20-09 02:25 PM Response to Original message |
1. BS ALERT... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-20-09 02:59 PM Response to Reply #1 |
24. Really. Pres. Obama never said what the OP claims. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
angee_is_mad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-20-09 03:26 PM Response to Reply #24 |
50. yep |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-20-09 04:51 PM Response to Reply #24 |
60. So you're claiming that John Nichols of the Nation is a liar? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-20-09 03:12 PM Response to Reply #1 |
40. Obama: But I'm pleased that recently added amendments have made this landmark bill even stronger. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skittles (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-22-09 12:07 AM Response to Reply #1 |
82. actually, Obama did say that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yourout (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-20-09 02:26 PM Response to Original message |
2. How could anyone say that with a straight face. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skittles (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-22-09 12:08 AM Response to Reply #2 |
83. someone who excels at giving speeches could |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
w4rma (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-20-09 02:27 PM Response to Original message |
3. Liar. Total BSing. (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GodlessBiker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-20-09 02:27 PM Response to Original message |
4. The pressure clearly is getting to him. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polpilot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-20-09 03:18 PM Response to Reply #4 |
45. REEEEEEDICCCULOUS!!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
golddigger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-20-09 02:29 PM Response to Original message |
5. WTF? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-20-09 02:31 PM Response to Original message |
6. Who does he think he's kidding?! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
levander (257 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-20-09 02:33 PM Response to Original message |
7. I am so tired of the political spin on this issue |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AndyA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-20-09 02:34 PM Response to Original message |
8. Everyone keeps talking about compromise. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
phleshdef (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-20-09 02:54 PM Response to Reply #8 |
18. They didn't give up ANY of those things for a Republican vote. They gave them up for democrat votes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AndyA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-20-09 03:52 PM Response to Reply #18 |
55. I said "opponents" which is not limited to the left or the right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-20-09 02:34 PM Response to Original message |
9. Beware, Big Bro is watching you! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
timeforpeace (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-20-09 02:34 PM Response to Original message |
10. He's gonna become known as P.T. Obama. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
treestar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-20-09 02:35 PM Response to Original message |
11. O'Neill is wrong |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-20-09 02:37 PM Response to Reply #11 |
13. so abortion rights are expendable in your book, right? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
treestar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-20-09 02:47 PM Response to Reply #13 |
15. That is so ridiculously unfair I will not respond |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-20-09 03:03 PM Response to Reply #15 |
30. It's part of "choice" ... how about you men give UP your insurance on your ED pills? eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
phleshdef (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-20-09 02:55 PM Response to Reply #13 |
20. And exactly how are abortion rights and less available then they were beforehand? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Better Believe It (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-20-09 02:49 PM Response to Reply #11 |
16. Do you support the Leiberman/Nelson amendments and agree they have made the bill stronger? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-20-09 03:02 PM Response to Reply #11 |
27. Fe-males? Damn, what do you Males want? How very disrespectful. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madfloridian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-20-09 02:36 PM Response to Original message |
12. Yes, he speaks of anti-choice amendments |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ildem09 (472 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-20-09 02:37 PM Response to Original message |
14. I didn't know Orwell wrote for Obama |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Progressive_Angel (20 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-20-09 02:50 PM Response to Reply #14 |
17. obama clearly is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-20-09 02:55 PM Response to Reply #14 |
19. Obama got the Nobel War Is Peace Prize, don't ya know? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
timeforpeace (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-20-09 02:55 PM Response to Reply #14 |
22. Obama doesn't realize 1984 was supposed to be a cautionary tale, not a treatise. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-20-09 02:57 PM Response to Reply #14 |
23. It's a continuation of American Crusade 2001+ ... here's the WH Instruction Manual = |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
asjr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-20-09 02:55 PM Response to Original message |
21. When Obama spoke did he actually say Nelson |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-20-09 03:01 PM Response to Reply #21 |
25. This takes the notion of "benefit of the doubt" to inane levels. Obama's bought an paid for |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
asjr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-20-09 03:09 PM Response to Reply #25 |
37. Well, have it your way. Don't vote for |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Better Believe It (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-20-09 03:26 PM Response to Reply #37 |
49. Will there be a next time? Obama has indicated he might not be the Democratic Party candidate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-20-09 03:02 PM Response to Reply #21 |
28. Not only that, but Pres. Obama has already publicly and strongly decried the Stupak amendment. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-20-09 03:04 PM Response to Reply #28 |
32. Yes, like Obama supporting a STRONG Public Option while he was running for President? eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-20-09 04:59 PM Response to Reply #32 |
63. He still supports it as does Rep. Weiner and Sen. Barbara Boxer, but they all support HCR |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-20-09 03:14 PM Response to Reply #28 |
42. Yea, and we can trust on Obama to say one thing and do another |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-20-09 05:03 PM Response to Reply #42 |
65. Repeating a falsehood doesn't make it true. He is keeping his promise to end the Iraq war by 2011. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-20-09 05:08 PM Response to Reply #65 |
68. Obama did not end torture. He is still continuing with rendition |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-20-09 05:13 PM Response to Reply #68 |
72. "On Day 2 of his administration, President Obama reverses key Bush "war on terror " policies" (link) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-20-09 05:15 PM Response to Reply #72 |
73. That was for show! Everything he has done since is a continuation of Bush's policies |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-20-09 05:16 PM Response to Reply #73 |
74. "Everything" eh? Your vitrolic mendacity is very amusing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-20-09 03:13 PM Response to Reply #21 |
41. Obama: But I'm pleased that recently added amendments have made this landmark bill even stronger. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Better Believe It (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-20-09 03:24 PM Response to Reply #21 |
48. You're right! He was clearly speaking about the tax on indoor tanning service amendment! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-20-09 03:01 PM Response to Original message |
26. Your OP is misleading. Pres. Obama never specified the Leiberman/Nelson amendments. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurt_and_Hunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-20-09 03:02 PM Response to Reply #26 |
29. Okay, what was he referring to? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-20-09 03:08 PM Response to Reply #29 |
36. He was being supportive of the process. He's on record as being against the Stupak amendment. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurt_and_Hunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-20-09 03:16 PM Response to Reply #36 |
44. Let's try again. What was he referring to? (I can help you out here...) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-20-09 03:20 PM Response to Reply #44 |
46. You can try to spin his words like a top, but I've made myself clear. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cherokeeprogressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-20-09 03:08 PM Response to Reply #26 |
34. Since he didn't single them out, they must be included. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-20-09 03:11 PM Response to Reply #34 |
39. That's ridiculous. He made a very public statement condemning the Stupak amendment. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cherokeeprogressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-20-09 03:23 PM Response to Reply #39 |
47. Tighten me up a little here... Are we not talking about Nelson/Lieberman and the US Senate? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-20-09 03:29 PM Response to Reply #47 |
51. Pres. Obama was approving of the process and never mentioned the Nelson/Lieberman amendment. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-20-09 03:08 PM Response to Reply #26 |
35. Obama: But I'm pleased that recently added amendments have made this landmark bill even stronger. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dave29 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-20-09 03:03 PM Response to Original message |
31. He said no such thing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-20-09 03:06 PM Response to Reply #31 |
33. Yeah, who ya gonna believe: your own stinking eyes and ears or "corporate democrats" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-20-09 03:16 PM Response to Reply #33 |
43. Obama could sell a Yugo to his apologists on this board |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cherokeeprogressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-20-09 03:31 PM Response to Reply #43 |
53. They would never call it a Cadillac. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Better Believe It (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-20-09 03:30 PM Response to Reply #31 |
52. Right. The White House lied when they quoted Obama's statement in their press release. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-20-09 03:51 PM Response to Reply #52 |
54. You didn't quote from the WH press release in the OP title. Instead, you made up a false OP title. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-20-09 03:55 PM Response to Reply #54 |
56. OP tittle encapsulates what Obama said on WH press release |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-20-09 04:48 PM Response to Reply #56 |
58. Pres. Obama never mentioned the Nelson/Lieberman amendment. The OP title is deliberately misleading. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-20-09 04:58 PM Response to Reply #58 |
62. Those that doubt Big Bro, are guilty of thoughtcrime! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-20-09 05:06 PM Response to Reply #62 |
67. Those that blatantly mislead with false OP titles get called on their bullshit is more like it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-20-09 05:10 PM Response to Reply #67 |
70. It is you who always ask for when did Obama specifically say blah, blah, blah |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-20-09 05:17 PM Response to Reply #70 |
76. Moving the goalposts? The OP title is clearly wrong. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-20-09 03:11 PM Response to Original message |
38. Obama: But I'm pleased that recently added amendments have made this landmark bill even stronger. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Metta (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-20-09 04:29 PM Response to Original message |
57. Anything Obama says anymore is 1984-speak. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-20-09 04:51 PM Response to Original message |
59. False OP title. FYI, 'Dean said the Senate bill had actually “improved” over the past few weeks...' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-20-09 05:03 PM Response to Reply #59 |
66. Dean did not approve of the Ben Nelson appeasement |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-20-09 05:08 PM Response to Reply #66 |
69. Neither has Pres. Obama approved of it. Dean & Obama agree that good things have happened, tho' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-20-09 05:12 PM Response to Reply #69 |
71. Oh, is Obama going to veto the bill if the Nelson and Stupak language remain in final bill? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-20-09 05:20 PM Response to Reply #71 |
77. Sen. Barbara Boxer & Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz are confident the language will be changed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
freddie mertz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-20-09 04:53 PM Response to Original message |
61. Our forthright and principled president. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-20-09 05:00 PM Response to Reply #61 |
64. Elmer Gantry from Chicago |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bvar22 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-20-09 05:16 PM Response to Original message |
75. K&R...back UP to an even zero. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mcablue (625 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-20-09 05:22 PM Response to Original message |
78. No medicare buy-in makes the bill stronger? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-20-09 07:59 PM Response to Reply #78 |
79. Obama is the new slick salesman for corporate America |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
freddie mertz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-20-09 08:05 PM Response to Reply #78 |
80. It's ridiculous happy-talk, aimed at people they "hope" are stupid. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Better Believe It (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-22-09 12:01 AM Response to Original message |
81. For DU'ers back in town from weekend trips |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-22-09 12:10 AM Response to Reply #81 |
84. Here is an illustration where we are in the scheme of things: we are the proles |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WT Fuheck (392 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-22-09 12:28 AM Response to Original message |
85. How any Democrat can support a bill that sells every female in the country down the river |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-22-09 12:29 AM Response to Original message |
86. That's just fucking pathetic. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon Jan 13th 2025, 08:56 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC