Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Carney v. Cantor

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-11 03:03 PM
Original message
Carney v. Cantor

Carney v. Cantor

By Steve Benen

House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-Va.) this morning condemned Occupy Wall Street activists, saying they represent a “mob.” In apparent reference to Democrats, the Republican leader added that “some” in Washington are interested in “the pitting of Americans against Americans.”

I was glad to see White House Press Secretary Jay Carney take note of Cantor’s remarks. In fact, after noting the Majority Leader’s “unbound” hypocrisy, the president’s spokesperson brought up a good point I hadn’t thought of.

Back in April, Cantor appeared on CNBC to decry the number of Americans who don’t pay income taxes due to their low incomes. And while talking about tax policy, he suggested it was time those poorer people paid up.

“(W)hen you see these special interest loopholes and deductions and the rest, we’ve got to get rid of those, sure, because we want to bring down the rates for everybody,” Cantor said. “But we also have a situation in this country where you’re nearing 50 percent of people who don’t even pay income taxes.”

The line is a common one among Republicans these days, and critics have seen it as an attack on the poor by leaders of the GOP. Or, to put it another way, those critics see it as pitting one group of Americans (the poor) against another (the rich).

This is more than just a throwaway line at a press briefing. Leading Republican officials — including Cantor, Mitt Romney, and Rick Perry — believe Americans who don’t make enough money to be eligible for income taxes should see their tax burdens go up. It’s the kind of far-right class warfare conservatives prefer not to acknowledge — the kind that says the wealthy should pay less, and working families should pay more. (Romney is an especially egregious example, since he’s a multi-millionaire who not only wants to raise working-class taxes, but also wants to ensure that folks at his income level pay a lower tax rate than the middle class.)

But this turns Cantor’s argument on its head. For the Majority Leader, activists who want millionaires and billionaires to sacrifice are guilty of “pitting Americans against Americans.” But Republicans, including Cantor, who want the middle class to face a tax hike are just being sensible.

more


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Enrique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-11 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. i don't think it was Carney that brought up the earlier Cantor quote
I think that was the TPM writer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-11 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yes
"I think that was the TPM writer."

...Benen's lead in is awkward, but TPM used the point to illustrate what Carney said:

"I sense a little hypocrisy unbound here--what we're seeing on the streets of New York is a an expression of democracy," Cantor(?) said. "I think I remember how Mr. cantor described protests of the tea party--I can't understand how one man's mob is another man's democracy."


Ooops, isn't that supposed to be Carney and not Cantor?

:rofl:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Oct 18th 2024, 01:13 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC