Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

ABC: About That 3 a.m. Call… Clinton Defends Obama’s National Security Chops

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
ellisonz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-23-11 06:54 PM
Original message
ABC: About That 3 a.m. Call… Clinton Defends Obama’s National Security Chops
By Kirit Radia
Oct 23, 2011 6:53pm
About That 3 a.m. Call… Clinton Defends Obama’s National Security Chops

Now that Osama bin Laden, Moammar Gadhafi and Anwar al-Awlaki have meet their end under President Obama’s term in office, how does Hillary Clinton feel about Obama’s ability to handle national security issues, namely those “3 a.m. calls” she implied he wouldn’t be able to handle during the 2008 presidential primary campaign?

“President Obama has passed with flying colors every leadership challenge,” Clinton said today on NBC’s “Meet the Press.”

Asked about her accusation during their heated battle for the Democratic nomination that Obama wouldn’t be able to handle emerencies, the secretary of state, who by many accounts works well with the president, defended her boss.

“I think this president has demonstrated that, in a still very dangerous world, it’s important to have someone at the helm of our country who understands how to manage what is an incredibly complex world now,” she said. “Yes, we have a lot of threats, but we also have opportunities, and I think President Obama has grasped that and has performed extraordinarily well.”

http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2011/10/about-that-3-a-m-call-clinton-defends-obamas-national-security-chops/

O8)
Refresh | +22 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
customerserviceguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-23-11 07:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. In 2016, she's going to claim credit
for everything that went right during the Obama administration, whether it is a four year one or an eight year one.

She still wants one more grab at the brass ring.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-23-11 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. She also speaks the truth: President Obama has stepped up to the
plate and performed stunningly for a man with no 'chops'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
customerserviceguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-23-11 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. She's being a good little soldier
and making sure he gets the credit. And Barack Obama has taken the national security issue off the table for the Rethugs, all they can argue is that he hasn't moved fast enough.

But I don't think it's going to be the burning issue of next year's election, unless the Islamic world starts turning on itself before November, 2012. I think that's entirely possible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-23-11 07:49 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. And he's been and continues to be a damn fine President, as
Clinton validates, whether you chose to concur or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
customerserviceguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-23-11 08:41 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. In this area, he certainly has
But that doesn't mean she won't try to take all the credit for it in four years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-23-11 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. That wont work and she wont even try. She's doing her job and being a good SOS - and Democrat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
customerserviceguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-23-11 09:47 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. And keeping her options open, just the same. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
ellisonz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-11 01:04 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. I think many here could learn something here from Hillary about...
...fidelity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
SkyDaddy7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-11 08:53 PM
Response to Reply #2
21. +1000! Nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
polmaven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-11 07:07 AM
Response to Reply #1
13. She has said...more than once
that she will NOT run for president again. As a matter of fact, she has indicated that she does not want a second term as SoS. Apparently you know more than she what her plans are for the future,eh?

Hillary Clinton's name will not be on the ballot in 2016 - for either the primary or the general election. How often does she need to say it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
customerserviceguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-11 05:39 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. I stand by my prediction
There was no reason to go into the administration unless she wanted something else for her resume. She could have easily stayed in as US Senator from NY, but that was only used as a steppingstone. The SoS postion is nothing but a further steppingstone on the way to the top.

I don't believe her, but you are perfectly entitled to do so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Honeycombe8 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 10:10 AM
Response to Reply #14
22. SOS is not a stepping stone to the Presidency. Maybe it's happened
a time or two, when a President was ALSO a four star General or something. But it typically has been of no benefit to running for the Presidency. It is not a position where a person makes policy. The SOS follows orders and implements policy decisions. They also offer advice, which may or may not be taken. They also run the State Dept. In other words, it's a bureaucratic position. Not a springboard to a leadership position. That would be the VP slot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-23-11 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
3. I dunno...but it seems she felt somethings good about the policy. Here:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-23-11 10:04 PM
Response to Original message
9. His national security chops are largely indisputable now
Only the real anti-Obama fanatics and assorted right wing crazies even bother to make the argument anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
ellisonz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-11 01:05 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. So much for Democrats being weak on foreign policy...
That old canard is swimming with the fishes and Osama Bin Laden.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-11 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #9
17. It's true what you say... The Dem Party will never be the "Anti-Vietnam, Peace-Nik Hippies
Edited on Mon Oct-24-11 07:06 PM by KoKo
EVER AGAIN!

The Re-BRANDING of the DEMOCRATIC PARTY IS COMPLETE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-11 04:45 AM
Response to Original message
12. How did he do against the true enemy -Wall Street?
And how did Obama do against corporate rule in general?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-11 07:50 PM
Response to Reply #12
18. "Don't Ask...and the "Won't Tell." ....Who Coulda' Known?
OP Word from RW Think Tanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Vattel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-11 06:14 PM
Response to Original message
15. His failure in Afghanistan, his unconsitutional war in Libya,
his killing of many innocent people as "collateral damage"--all great stuff for the hopelessly militaristic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
ellisonz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-11 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Because when the Taliban...
...throw acid in the face of a little girl going to school. It's Obama's fault. Yay, Taliban. :spank:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-11 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. Acid in the face of little girl going to school? "Incubator Babies Plug Pulled by Saddam!"
Proven Lie in Saddam's case...and we have RW THINK TANKS, Drudge, Limbaugh and the MSM being fed and feeding this propaganda to us 24/7...and you've learned nothing in these years as a Democrat?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
ellisonz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-11 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. You're very wrong. The pictures accompanying these reports must be photoshopped then?
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27713077/
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/nov/22/afghanistan-gender-women-taliban
http://english.aljazeera.net/news/asia/2008/11/20081112111240476386.html
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lmpewHomWdk

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acid_attack

Seriously? You need to do some homework about the world. And how dare you question by Democratic credentials because I do my thinking for myself and don't just follow the crowd. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
BlueIris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-11 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #15
23. Now, now, Americans like killers. So it's valid for him to use that as a job credential.
WINNING.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Dec 22nd 2024, 11:12 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC