Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Unemployment rate ticks down to 9% in November

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-11 08:40 AM
Original message
Unemployment rate ticks down to 9% in November
The nation's unemployment rate fell to 9 percent for October, from 9.1 percent last month, but hiring slowed as employers faced more uncertainty over future economic growth.


The Labor Department said the economy added 80,000 jobs last month, the fewest in four months and below September's revised total of 158,000.


Businesses added 104,000 jobs, below September's total. Government shed 24,000 jobs.

The report included some positive signs: The government revised August and September's figures upward by 102,000. Average hourly earnings rose. And the unemployment rate fell for the first time since July, because a separate survey of households showed more people found work.


Healthier consumer spending was the key reason the economy expanded at an annual pace of 2.5 percent in the July-September quarter, the best quarterly growth in a year. Growth in consumer spending tripled from the spring, despite renewed recession fears and wide fluctuations in the stock market.

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-201_162-57318401/u.s-unemployment-rate-falls-to-9/
Refresh | +15 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
RockaFowler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-11 08:57 AM
Response to Original message
1. Count my husband in this
He just found a job!! For the first time in 18 months.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-11 09:05 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Congratulations!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Number23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-11 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. That's gotta be a huge relief to the two of you
Congratulations!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
steve2470 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-11 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. yay congrats to him !!! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-11 07:37 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
great white snark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-11 06:49 PM
Response to Original message
5. Outstanding!
:bounce: :applause: :bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
bhikkhu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-11 08:44 PM
Response to Original message
7. Excellent news!
Along with the upward revisions of the past two month's figures, and the good growth report on GDP, this should put to rest double-dip recession fears, at least through the holiday season.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
coalition_unwilling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-05-11 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. Don't mean to be Debbie Downer here, but the economy only
Edited on Sat Nov-05-11 10:27 AM by coalition_unwilling
created 80,000 new jobs last month. That's not even enough new jobs to keep pace with the average monthly increase in the work force. So why did the UE rate drop .1%? Two reasons: people stopped looking for work and were no longer counted as 'unemmployed' by the BLS and the labor force did not grow at the average monthly rate.

IIRC, the economy must generate 150,000 new jobs per month merely to keep pace with the growth in the labor force.

As for a double-dip recession, once those government job cuts gather steam early next year, UE rate will start rising again. This past month, increases in private sector hiring were almost entirely set off by cuts in government jobs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
NorthCarolina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-11 09:05 PM
Response to Original message
8. I know that's the "official" number, but does anyone happen to know the actual number?
I recall Bernie Sanders mentioning that it was actually something like 15 or 16%.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-05-11 01:10 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. Which "actual number"?
There are near infinite ways of determining such things.... for example: what do you think the percentage of people is that a)are employed, b) happy with their jobs, c) are making a "living wage"?

This is why Bernie's numbers are just as trustworthy as the "official" numbers. They aren't useful numbers for determining anything as nebulously defined as an "actual" number, and they can only provide useful measurements when compared to themselves, or when understood in the full terms of their measurement systems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
bhikkhu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-05-11 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #8
13. The number of jobs is about 140 million
you can divide that into population any number of ways, and imagine that it should be different in many ways.

I think the jobs number is pretty healthy, and the percentage of people working is quite healthy historically, but wages could certainly be better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-05-11 11:11 PM
Response to Reply #13
19. Nice that you think that 16.2% unemployment is a "healthy" number
Edited on Sat Nov-05-11 11:18 PM by brentspeak
What respective gated community do you live in, again?

http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.t15.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-05-11 11:20 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. Comments like the one you're responding to
make me shake my head in disbelief.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
bhikkhu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-06-11 11:59 PM
Response to Reply #19
25. The labor participation rate is what I was talking about


That's the percentage of the total population which is working for wages, and it is at a very high level historically.

There are more roles in society than simply working for a wage, and many of those roles are very important. I think civil society suffers very much if too many people have to sacrifice education, child-raising, retirement, taking care of a household, participating in their community, etc, because every waking moment must be spent in the pursuit of money.

Low wages is more the problem than volume of jobs, though if industry can convince or coerce everyone into thinking they have to work for a living, then the sheer volume of job-seekers themselves will keep wages low.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-05-11 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #8
14. Bernie Is Referring ToU-6
Total unemployed, plus all persons marginally attached to the labor force, plus total employed part time for economic reasons, as a percent of the civilian work force.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
MjolnirTime Donating Member (218 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-05-11 12:12 AM
Response to Original message
9. The Economy tries to grow in spite of every effort by the Repukes to snuff it
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-05-11 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
12. Sad that this is considered
good news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-05-11 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. Sad that you don't consider a second consecutive month of 0.1% decline in unemployment to be
good news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-05-11 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Do you know how many people can't put
food on the table, how many people can't find even menial jobs?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-05-11 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Do you know how many people can now do so because of the continuing drop in unemployment?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-05-11 11:17 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. Real unemployment is around 16%.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-06-11 01:16 AM
Response to Reply #20
22. "Gallup: Real (Unadjusted) Unemployment Best in Two Years"
Edited on Sun Nov-06-11 01:17 AM by ClarkUSA
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-06-11 01:38 AM
Response to Reply #20
23. According to whom? And if so, how does that change the fact the economy is improving?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
pinqy Donating Member (536 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-06-11 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #20
24. Please explain how
"Total unemployed, plus all persons marginally attached to the labor force, plus total employed part time for economic reasons" is "real" unemployment when it includes people not trying to work and people who have jobs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
frazzled Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-05-11 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. A tenth of a percent each month adds up to 1.2% in a year
That would put the unemployment rate below 8%. And in another year below 7%. And that means real jobs for real people. If Congress would have passed the president's Jobs Act, you could have doubled that (especially for government jobs like teachers and firefighters, police).

I think you need to re-listen to the lyrics from that old song from the musical Pajama Game, about a union fight for a 7 1/2 cent raise. Get a pencil and a pad and figure it out!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1w4mVycaC_o



Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Major Hogwash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-11 12:57 AM
Response to Original message
26. What is this, the 18th month in a row of job growth while President Obama is in the White House?
I lost count of how many months in a row it is now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Major Hogwash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-11 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. Repub. Govs. have been laying off state workers each month this year to keep unemployment rate high.
Thom Hartmann said this last night on his program.

He said that EVERY Republican Governor -- All of them -- have been laying off state workers in their state EVERY month this year to artifically bolster the unemployment figures.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Dec 23rd 2024, 12:00 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC