Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Foreign policy naivete shows in GOP debate

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
Cali_Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-11 07:33 PM
Original message
Foreign policy naivete shows in GOP debate

Times Editorial
Foreign policy naivete shows in GOP debate
Tuesday, November 15, 2011

The simplistic hawkish approach to foreign affairs by the Republican candidates for president reflects a lack of sophistication and thoughtfulness about the nation's role in the world. Too many of them indicated during Saturday night's debate that they would be willing to engage the American military against Iran and embrace the use of waterboarding against terror suspects. After two wars that have strained the armed forces and a healthy debate over the use of torture during the Bush era, the Republicans too often sounded off-key and out of touch with reality.

The lively debate, moderated by Scott Pelley of CBS News and Major Garrett of the National Journal, suggested the frontrunners are irresponsible or ill-informed
. Mitt Romney and Newt Gingrich would commit U.S. troops to military action in Iran if other strategies such as sanctions and covert disruptions did not deter the country from obtaining nuclear weapons. Romney agreed that it is worth going to war with Iran to prevent a nuclear Iran.

Beyond the clear stances of Jon Huntsman and Ron Paul, the candidates seemed to have little appreciation for just how war-weary Americans are after more than 10 years in Afghanistan and nearly as long in Iraq. The puffed-up saber rattling of Romney and Gingrich dismissed the trillions of dollars that modern warfare costs and the thousands of American lives put at risk.

<...>

Foreign policy often takes a back seat in campaigns for president, particularly when the economy is anemic and unemployment remains the top issue. Yet foreign policy consumes much of any president's time, and the world is more complicated than ever. Saturday night's debate reinforced how much the Republican front-runners have to learn, and how voters will have to hold them accountable for their eagerness to go to war and torture enemies.

Read more: http://www.tampabay.com/opinion/editorials/foreign-policy-naivete-shows-in-gop-debate/1201712
Refresh | +8 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC