Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Tax burden is disproportionately in the area of military spending

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
Sheepshank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-23-11 10:35 AM
Original message
Tax burden is disproportionately in the area of military spending
Edited on Wed Nov-23-11 10:44 AM by Sheepshank


I'm sick of hearing all about "entitlement programs breaking the backs of average Americans" shit. But as soon as someone raises the idea that some of the spending could be reduced via reduction in military spending, the R's go ballistic.

Globally the USA fear machines has enabled the military to outspend any other nation several times over.


http://www.globalissues.org/article/75/world-military-spending


Why are the numbers quoted above for US spending so much higher than what has been announced as the budget for the Department of Defense?

Unfortunately, the budget numbers can be a bit confusing. For example, the Fiscal Year budget requests for US military spending do not include combat figures (which are supplemental requests that Congress approves separately). The budget for nuclear weapons falls under the Department of Energy, and for the 2010 request, was about $25 billion.
Refresh | +3 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-23-11 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
1. K&R - So war spending is STILL OFF BUDGET???
Edited on Wed Nov-23-11 10:43 AM by patrice
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-23-11 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. i.e. How do they account for/CONTROL Supplemental Spending if it isn't in the Budget? nt
Edited on Wed Nov-23-11 10:46 AM by patrice
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Sheepshank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-23-11 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. It's not in the "military" budget
Edited on Wed Nov-23-11 11:09 AM by Sheepshank
I assume most gov't budgets are outlined similarly. In the Gov't office I work in, each department has it's own budget and within that budget there are specific line items. As an example, in Zoning, there are budgets for equipment, training, office supplies, equipment, postage, vehicle maint, phones etc.

That Zoning Department also uses IT equipment (pc's printers, software etc)...BUT the IT items are not in the Zoning budget, rather in the IT Department Budget. Those items can easily be found for a total cost of running the Zoning Department, but part of the cost of running Zoning, is buried in the budget of other departments.

What the article is saying is that just using the Military Department budget codes doesn't give a full picture of military spending...expecially those items related to nuclear weapons, because they are added as a line item to another departmental budget.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-23-11 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Thanks, but I got that part about the DOE & nukes, but I still don't understand how Supplemental
expenditures for war are tracked.

Maybe they're just not in the current fiscal year Military Spending, but once they are known in total they show up in the coming fiscal year's Military Spending?

I will try to look this up in a bit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Sheepshank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-23-11 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Not off budget necessarily
Edited on Wed Nov-23-11 11:08 AM by Sheepshank
just buried in the line item of other departmental budgets...see my explanation in #3.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-23-11 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. It looks to me like we are talking about 2 different things. Stuff that shows up as line items in
Edited on Wed Nov-23-11 11:30 AM by patrice
other departments, e.g. nuclear weapons (for the Military) in DOE budget, compared to paying for wars with ONGOING Supplemental Spending as "needed".
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Dec 22nd 2024, 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC