Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Senators reach compromise on detainee language in defense bill (Feinstein amendment 99-1)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
Tx4obama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-11 08:22 PM
Original message
Senators reach compromise on detainee language in defense bill (Feinstein amendment 99-1)
Edited on Thu Dec-01-11 08:34 PM by Tx4obama

SNIP

Senators ultimately reached an agreement to amend the bill to make clear it's not the bill's intent to allow for the indefinite detention of U.S. citizens and others legally residing in the country.

"It would provide the assurance that we are not adversely affecting the rights of American citizens in this language," Levin said while expressing support for the compromise.

"It supports present law," Feinstein added.

SNIP

http://www.cnn.com/2011/12/01/politics/senate-detainee-policy/index.html


More info, related article here: http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x5077236

... The compromise amendment from Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), cleared 99-1 ...

http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=112&session=1&vote=00215

p.s. Kyl (R-AZ) was the one 'no' vote.


Refresh | +10 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
Tx4obama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-11 08:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. OP is edited to reflect that Kyl (R-AZ) was the one 'no' vote. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Ter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-02-11 01:58 AM
Response to Original message
2. 99 to 1?
What was Kyl's reason for voting no?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-02-11 08:24 AM
Response to Original message
3. So we're against and not practicing indefinite detention? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
JoePhilly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-02-11 09:17 AM
Response to Original message
4. But I thought the Senate was going to approve language such that the Feds could
pick me up and plop me in a FEMA detention camp forever ... if I farted in church ... because that could be considered as gaseous weapon of mass destruction.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
SidDithers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-02-11 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
5. K&R...
Wonder if Greenwald will report this. His updates so far only cover the defeat of the first Feinstein amendment.

Sid
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Dec 22nd 2024, 04:36 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC