Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama the strategist

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-04-11 09:04 AM
Original message
Obama the strategist

Obama the strategist

by sujigu

<...>

The Affordable Care Act comes first to mind, especially with this clause that health care providers need to take 80%-85% of their incoming dollars and make sure it actually goes to care as opposed to overhead, which could be sales/marketing/solid gold toilet paper. Insuring people with pre-existing conditions and expanding insurance to cover minors until age 26 under their parents plan was one thing, but this bomb really struck me. The health care bill was difficult to push through a Congress with blue dogs worried about the deficit. The analysis has been that the law instigated the far right, paving the way for the Koch Bros. to lay down their astroturf for the Tea Party buses to come rolling through. The misinformation machine of Faux News went into full spin mode with Glenn Beck the false prophet. If only Obama had messaged it correctly, to make it clear to the American people what they were getting out of the deal and how he would've solved the problem, everyone would've left the confines of their town halls and everything would have been better is the common wisdom. "How could the Hope and Change guy fail so hardcore at messaging?" We then hear about liberal dissatisfaction with a public option (rightfully so), and we have the picture of a president who punches hippies while drowning in the red tide of the Tea Party.

I don't buy that. Obama's strategy is a bit deeper. He does things long term. It's not perfect, don't misread me here, but I like it in that so far despite the resounding offensive against his idea, it's standing up. He needed blue dogs to get on board and he knew that the deficit was going to be the next hot topic of debate. The Tea Party had already been brewing. I have little evidence it took him completely by surprise, and despite the fact that we laughed at Sharon Engle and Christine O'Donnell, the right wing wave of 2010 wasn't too difficult to predict. Maybe not in its entirety, but Democrats were already heading for the hills. Better to get the law through at that time then to have it drowned out once the Tea Party Express started rolling through the streets. It's a highly corporatist bill, with many good criticisms, including the lack of sufficient existing health care infrastructure, constitutionality of the mandate, and questions on long term care and price controls. A single payer system would most likely be the best way, but from a pragmatists perspective, it has to first get made law, then be impervious to repeal (both in that it cannot be repealed, or that repealing it is worse than leaving it in), then tested for its constitutionality, then survive the "real life" test where it has to be implemented by real, living, breathing people.

The health care law mandates digitizing records and has started a new, burgeoning industry of Health Information Technology. Stimulus funds went to training people by giving them 6 month certificates and retooling existing professionals to make jobs that easily make at least $20/hr for people with minimal certification. So when it's implemented, no one will be able to say, "You didn't think this through effectively enough," or "Look at this mess! People's records are being lost or destroyed! You've forced a tidal wave on us and it's all your fault!" So, we cleared this hurdle.

Then there were the waivers. That was brilliant; one of my favorite Obama moments ever. The look on the Republican governor's faces when he essentially said: "If you can do better, then go ahead," were beyond priceless. Checkmate bitches. Obama loves to net his opponent in a web of hypocrisy, and the GOP is almost always too eager to oblige. If they do not develop public options, and many of those federal dollar-loving red states cannot or will not implement better-than-mandate options, due to the fact they loathe raising taxes, they'll easily take the exchange dollars and the grants while simultaneously declaring him a Kenyan Marxist with anti-colonial views. More fodder for local newspapers outlining what I love to call "stimulus hypocrisy." Plus, and this gets even better, people who CAN come up with public options will be free to do so and be given ample time to develop them to serve as models that "Hey, I know the public option smacked of spending blue dogs, but these states made it work, and will have visible results, so why don't you go ahead and copy them?" Governor Schweitzer, master of the Democrat-sounding-like-a-Republican strategy, was able to sell it to his constituents, instead of having Obama try to connect to voters who seemed to prefer their local leaders to him.

more

Great read!

Refresh | +15 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-04-11 09:35 AM
Response to Original message
1. No comment? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
dennis4868 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-04-11 07:37 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. ummmm....
you are in DU...this is not a place to post positive Obama articles....heree he is treated like Bush. :-(
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
quaker bill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-05-11 06:30 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. It is all like that
The debt ceiling deal bears a similar hallmark. "if you can do better, bring it on" is a consistent feature. Outyear provisions that paint the opposition into tight corners are the norm. They are put into the future so the opposition pays little attention to them during passage, or assumes they will take the Whitehouse and huge majorities later so they can be reversed. He simply uses their hubris against them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
lindalou65 Donating Member (56 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-04-11 10:02 AM
Response to Original message
2. thanks for posting
I, too, think Obama is an excellent strategist and the media, Rethugs, et. al. have managed to paint him as weak, etc, etc. I will definitely vote for him in 2012. One important point to stress here is that the universal health care plan was not a new idea but it was an idea that its "time had come" to push as a top agenda item when Obama became President. He took it on and past "lessons learned" (from Clinton Admin) were used to getting this passed and propelled the idea into the Health Care Reform Act. Although it may have its imperfections, it is a overall great plan and can only be improved upon. Parts of it may not survive but other parts will and the more its options that go into effect and Americans see the benefits, the better chance we can have a better plan for all Americans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
great white snark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-04-11 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Agreed and we must not allow Republicans the numbers to pick this bill apart.
Take the House back in 2012!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Cognitive_Resonance Donating Member (733 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-04-11 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
5. K&R nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Dec 21st 2024, 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC