on anything. In addition, they completely distorted Senator Kerry's message. In addition, the media condoned a character assassination of both Kerry and his wife. ( Teresa is an incredibly accomplished woman, who led the Pittsburgh philanthropists in the mid 1990s to coordinate restoring Pittsburgh. Her first husband's chief of staff, who worked for her foundation spoke of their work recently and it is very impressive -
http://www.healthcarefinancenews.com/news/newsmaker-interview-jeffrey-lewis ) Both Kerrys are unusually good people, who if the country actually had been given as complete a picture of who they are as usually happens, the election might have been different.
Kerry won the three debates hands down - looking Presidential, knowledgeable, diplomatic and articulate. Bush looked weird in different ways in each debate.
As to this debate, the format encouraged them to go for each other's throats. I think that Romney spoke too fast at points and was visibly angry. Newt really may have offended many women with the tone of voice and his manner when he told Bachmann off - there was clearly a difference with the way he treated the others.
The Republicans problem is that both Newt and Mitt have major flaws - they are inconsistent and unlikable. But, the next tier are no better.
As to the crowd - it is more proof that we have two cultures that really do not share the same values. I was appalled that the audience cheered incredibly loud for Newt's claiming his idiotic statement on Palestinians.