|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
MiniMe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 01:23 PM Original message |
The repigs are now arguing that the HCR bill is unconstitutional |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mkultra (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 01:24 PM Response to Original message |
1. And that its a step backwards |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tridim (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 01:24 PM Response to Original message |
2. But torture wasn't. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MiniMe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 01:27 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. Exactly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughMoran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 05:59 PM Response to Reply #2 |
17. If, then, else | IF HCR is unconstitutional, THEN torture is unconstitutional, ELSE - STFU! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 01:31 PM Response to Original message |
4. Aren't they talking about the Nebraska deal - which really does seem unfair... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MiniMe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 04:07 PM Response to Reply #4 |
11. That was one of the things brought up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stopbush (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 01:31 PM Response to Original message |
5. Then they'll need to bring a lawsuit after it's enacted, won't they? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
niceypoo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 01:49 PM Response to Original message |
6. Yeah, I turned the volume down about a half hour ago |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cali_Democrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 01:50 PM Response to Original message |
7. How long before some "progressives" on the left start marching on the Supreme Court? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VMI Dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 01:52 PM Response to Reply #7 |
9. Around the time pro-war "progressives" join up. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cali_Democrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 02:08 PM Response to Reply #9 |
10. Well I think it's a little different |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
no_hypocrisy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 01:51 PM Response to Original message |
8. Let the Supreme Court worry about that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalFighter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 05:48 PM Response to Original message |
12. I guess they haven't read the Constitution or don't understand the words. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 05:51 PM Response to Original message |
13. Wow, a rw talking point that has nothing to do with reality. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadHound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 05:51 PM Response to Original message |
14. Actually it's a good question |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
derby378 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 05:56 PM Response to Reply #14 |
15. Exactly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 05:57 PM Response to Original message |
16. I'd say that MANDATE is unconstitutional. eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AllentownJake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 05:59 PM Response to Original message |
18. I've questioned the constitutionality of mandating a private product myself |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 06:01 PM Response to Reply #18 |
19. particularly by the federal government, and using the IRS as an enforcer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AllentownJake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 06:12 PM Response to Reply #19 |
20. It certainly does, which is why Candidate Obama was against it. nt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Dec 26th 2024, 08:17 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC