|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
![]() |
jefferson_dem
![]() |
Mon Dec-28-09 11:51 AM Original message |
Tea Partiers To Republicans: You Better Call For Full Repeal of Reform, Or Else |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt
![]() |
Mon Dec-28-09 11:53 AM Response to Original message |
1. Hollow threat. To repeal would require 290 seats in the House |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito
![]() |
Mon Dec-28-09 11:57 AM Response to Reply #1 |
4. Since when are teabaggers rational? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
POAS
![]() |
Mon Dec-28-09 11:58 AM Response to Reply #1 |
5. Waiting for it...waiting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dkf
![]() |
Mon Dec-28-09 11:59 AM Response to Reply #1 |
8. Why 67? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito
![]() |
Mon Dec-28-09 12:00 PM Response to Reply #8 |
9. self-delete Correct response below mine. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dkf
![]() |
Mon Dec-28-09 12:02 PM Response to Reply #9 |
11. What happens if they just gut it instead? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt
![]() |
Mon Dec-28-09 12:04 PM Response to Reply #11 |
12. Still would take 67 votes in the Senate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dkf
![]() |
Mon Dec-28-09 10:53 PM Response to Reply #12 |
88. Can a puke pres gut it through reconciliation of the budget? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito
![]() |
Mon Dec-28-09 12:08 PM Response to Reply #11 |
16. Sorry I deleted my post. WeDidIt is right. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt
![]() |
Mon Dec-28-09 12:01 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. It takes 2/3 of the Senate to override a veto. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dkf
![]() |
Mon Dec-28-09 12:04 PM Response to Reply #10 |
13. God if I were a pubbie I would make Obama veto it every year to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt
![]() |
Mon Dec-28-09 12:06 PM Response to Reply #13 |
15. Nope, this push by the Teabaggers almost guarantees the Dems will pick up seats next year. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dkf
![]() |
Mon Dec-28-09 12:12 PM Response to Reply #15 |
20. I read your post and I'm mystified why you think so. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt
![]() |
Mon Dec-28-09 12:15 PM Response to Reply #20 |
22. Oh bull shit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
totodeinhere
![]() |
Mon Dec-28-09 03:01 PM Response to Reply #15 |
58. By next fall there might be other issues at the forefront that might influence voters. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito
![]() |
Mon Dec-28-09 12:10 PM Response to Reply #13 |
18. Are you kidding? If Obama were to veto the Repub. attempts to repeal this, it would |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jefferson_dem
![]() |
Mon Dec-28-09 12:10 PM Response to Reply #13 |
19. Don't you mean "screwn"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
roguevalley
![]() |
Mon Dec-28-09 09:57 PM Response to Reply #13 |
86. the teabaggery against the pugs is the only joy I feel that is left for me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stevenleser
![]() |
Mon Dec-28-09 10:10 PM Response to Reply #13 |
87. You have to control the congressional agenda to do that. No chance of that in 2010 (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
totodeinhere
![]() |
Mon Dec-28-09 02:58 PM Response to Reply #1 |
57. What if the GOP takes control of both the White House and Congress in 2012? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DrToast
![]() |
Mon Dec-28-09 03:29 PM Response to Reply #57 |
65. Yep, just because they are running on it, doesn't mean they need all the seats in '10 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
denem
![]() |
Tue Dec-29-09 09:46 PM Response to Reply #57 |
91. But then they need 60 in the Senate. No. Way. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yavin4
![]() |
Mon Dec-28-09 03:10 PM Response to Reply #1 |
61. Which Makes Pledging Full Repeal Politically Expedient |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raine1967
![]() |
Mon Dec-28-09 11:54 AM Response to Original message |
2. repealing the bill -- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito
![]() |
Mon Dec-28-09 11:59 AM Response to Reply #2 |
7. It's too bad that we have them to cancel out the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
abelenkpe
![]() |
Mon Dec-28-09 12:06 PM Response to Reply #2 |
14. If reconcilliation results in |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito
![]() |
Mon Dec-28-09 11:56 AM Response to Original message |
3. Thank you, teabaggers... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz
![]() |
Mon Dec-28-09 12:08 PM Response to Reply #3 |
17. That's a depressing statement |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito
![]() |
Mon Dec-28-09 01:05 PM Response to Reply #17 |
33. Who was talking about us gaining seats in '10? I never saw talk about that anywhere. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz
![]() |
Mon Dec-28-09 01:13 PM Response to Reply #33 |
34. One of many articles |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito
![]() |
Mon Dec-28-09 01:28 PM Response to Reply #34 |
35. "Improbably, Democrats may buck historical precedent by building an even stronger majority in two |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz
![]() |
Mon Dec-28-09 01:30 PM Response to Reply #35 |
36. I'd say at this point, it's impossible. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito
![]() |
Mon Dec-28-09 01:31 PM Response to Reply #36 |
37. It's not Obama's fault. As I said in my edit, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz
![]() |
Mon Dec-28-09 01:38 PM Response to Reply #37 |
38. Yeah, those people shouting "kill him" at Palin rallies were doing it in a nice way. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito
![]() |
Mon Dec-28-09 01:41 PM Response to Reply #38 |
39. AFTER those rallies, Beck, Limbaugh, and others stoked up the hatred |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz
![]() |
Mon Dec-28-09 01:46 PM Response to Reply #39 |
40. Cuz people shouting "kill him" really need to be "stoked up". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito
![]() |
Mon Dec-28-09 01:51 PM Response to Reply #40 |
42. They were a much smaller group before Beck and others stoked the flames |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz
![]() |
Mon Dec-28-09 01:54 PM Response to Reply #42 |
43. You're determined to blame others for Obama's failures. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito
![]() |
Mon Dec-28-09 02:15 PM Response to Reply #43 |
44. WHAT failures? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz
![]() |
Mon Dec-28-09 02:21 PM Response to Reply #44 |
45. If you have to ask... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito
![]() |
Mon Dec-28-09 02:31 PM Response to Reply #45 |
46. Yes, I have to ask. WHAT failures? Because here's a list of his successes: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz
![]() |
Mon Dec-28-09 02:36 PM Response to Reply #46 |
47. bvar22's list is a good starting point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito
![]() |
Mon Dec-28-09 02:47 PM Response to Reply #47 |
50. I don't care about Stinky's response to the list posted of real accomplishments |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz
![]() |
Mon Dec-28-09 02:49 PM Response to Reply #50 |
51. You don't care about an actual opposing opinion supported by facts? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito
![]() |
Mon Dec-28-09 02:50 PM Response to Reply #51 |
53. Obama "killing the public option" is supported by facts? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz
![]() |
Mon Dec-28-09 02:57 PM Response to Reply #53 |
56. Why yes, it is. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito
![]() |
Mon Dec-28-09 03:33 PM Response to Reply #56 |
67. Op eds and unnamed sources don't do much to prove that he killed the public option. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz
![]() |
Mon Dec-28-09 03:39 PM Response to Reply #67 |
70. Your own lack of research is all that allows you to maintain this state of denial. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito
![]() |
Mon Dec-28-09 03:48 PM Response to Reply #70 |
73. I'M not the one in denial. I see his accomplishments, unlike you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz
![]() |
Mon Dec-28-09 04:12 PM Response to Reply #73 |
77. Is there anything on that list that wouldn't have been done by ANY Democrat who ran in 2008? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito
![]() |
Mon Dec-28-09 04:26 PM Response to Reply #77 |
78. It COULD'VE been done by any Dem. but he DID it all. Not to mention something |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz
![]() |
Mon Dec-28-09 05:05 PM Response to Reply #78 |
84. The Cairo speech was definitely the highpoint, I'll give you that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz
![]() |
Mon Dec-28-09 02:43 PM Response to Reply #46 |
49. BTW, you left off all his successful bowel movements |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito
![]() |
Mon Dec-28-09 02:49 PM Response to Reply #49 |
52. Right-because the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act and allowing embryonic stem cell research |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz
![]() |
Mon Dec-28-09 02:54 PM Response to Reply #52 |
54. He signed his name to a bill. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dave29
![]() |
Mon Dec-28-09 03:07 PM Response to Reply #54 |
60. for a champion of the left, you might want to tone down the "retarded" rhetoric |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz
![]() |
Mon Dec-28-09 03:25 PM Response to Reply #60 |
64. I meant it seriously. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dave29
![]() |
Mon Dec-28-09 03:55 PM Response to Reply #64 |
74. you are just gross. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz
![]() |
Mon Dec-28-09 04:57 PM Response to Reply #74 |
82. I'm not the one trying to cloud the debate by throwing his sister into the mix. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito
![]() |
Mon Dec-28-09 03:31 PM Response to Reply #54 |
66. He did a lot more than that and your choice to ignore the very real accomplishments on the list |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz
![]() |
Mon Dec-28-09 03:37 PM Response to Reply #66 |
68. A barely minimal list for a caretaker president |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito
![]() |
Mon Dec-28-09 03:39 PM Response to Reply #68 |
69. BWAHAHAHAHA!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz
![]() |
Mon Dec-28-09 03:44 PM Response to Reply #69 |
71. That list has been posted and reposted. It's an embarrassment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito
![]() |
Mon Dec-28-09 03:57 PM Response to Reply #71 |
75. You are clearly a hater now. Nothing is good enough for you and your ilk. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz
![]() |
Mon Dec-28-09 04:09 PM Response to Reply #75 |
76. On the contrary. *Nothing* appears to be more than good enough for you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito
![]() |
Mon Dec-28-09 04:28 PM Response to Reply #76 |
80. He did a LOT-not "nothing." But keep sticking to that ridiculous line. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ellie
![]() |
Mon Dec-28-09 05:03 PM Response to Reply #75 |
83. Yes, you shouldn't bother with this one. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz
![]() |
Mon Dec-28-09 11:26 PM Response to Reply #83 |
89. Yeah, you might learn something. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ellie
![]() |
Tue Dec-29-09 09:34 PM Response to Reply #89 |
90. I doubt it. I have been reading your posts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jefferson_dem
![]() |
Mon Dec-28-09 03:48 PM Response to Reply #49 |
72. You've really sunk to bottom-feeder level now. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz
![]() |
Mon Dec-28-09 04:26 PM Response to Reply #72 |
79. Really? I'm not the one trotting out an Easter Egg Roll like it's the friggin Treaty of Versailles. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dave29
![]() |
Mon Dec-28-09 04:40 PM Response to Reply #79 |
81. is that really how it was trotted out? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dave29
![]() |
Mon Dec-28-09 02:55 PM Response to Reply #43 |
55. I thought we were supposed to be courting teabaggers? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
safeinOhio
![]() |
Mon Dec-28-09 12:19 PM Response to Reply #3 |
23. They won't stop until |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CaliforniaPeggy
![]() |
Mon Dec-28-09 11:58 AM Response to Original message |
6. Any stand by the teabaggers that increases the discomfort |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt
![]() |
Mon Dec-28-09 12:12 PM Response to Reply #6 |
21. The Firebaggers would like to do the same to the Democrats |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jefferson_dem
![]() |
Mon Dec-28-09 12:30 PM Response to Reply #21 |
24. All half dozen of them. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt
![]() |
Mon Dec-28-09 12:31 PM Response to Reply #24 |
25. Yep, that's why they are so reminiscent of the PUMAs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
phleshdef
![]() |
Mon Dec-28-09 12:39 PM Response to Reply #24 |
27. "Tiny circle-jerk of serial whiners", I wonder who gets to eat the cracker? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
silverweb
![]() |
Mon Dec-28-09 12:57 PM Response to Reply #21 |
30. "Firebaggers"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt
![]() |
Mon Dec-28-09 01:01 PM Response to Reply #30 |
32. FireDogLake |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
silverweb
![]() |
Mon Dec-28-09 01:51 PM Response to Reply #32 |
41. Riiiiiiiight. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS
![]() |
Mon Dec-28-09 12:35 PM Response to Original message |
26. I don't see why republicans would become supportive of the reform after they gave no support so far. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bitwit1234
![]() |
Mon Dec-28-09 12:43 PM Response to Original message |
28. Somebody PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE EXPLAIN TO ME |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt
![]() |
Mon Dec-28-09 12:45 PM Response to Reply #28 |
29. They did claim a crowd of no more than 35,000 was two million |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
southernyankeebelle
![]() |
Mon Dec-28-09 12:59 PM Response to Original message |
31. It is important we all go and vote. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Arkana
![]() |
Mon Dec-28-09 02:37 PM Response to Original message |
48. Sounds like Republicans are hostages and the teabaggers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
burning rain
![]() |
Mon Dec-28-09 03:07 PM Response to Original message |
59. If we're lucky, teabaggers may put Republicans in an impossible position in 2010. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ieoeja
![]() |
Mon Dec-28-09 03:14 PM Response to Original message |
62. "Republicans want to take away your healthcare" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Monk06
![]() |
Mon Dec-28-09 03:25 PM Response to Original message |
63. The Tea baggers love losing so much they want the whole GOP to go down with them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha
![]() |
Mon Dec-28-09 07:50 PM Response to Original message |
85. Dick armey and jane hamsher..ya better get to it! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thu Mar 13th 2025, 03:55 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC