Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

revisionism on Morning Joe is breathtaking

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Syrinx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-02-11 06:44 AM
Original message
revisionism on Morning Joe is breathtaking
The creator of Osama bin Laden is reveling in his death.

Mika's dad, Zbignew.

That guy is more responsible than any single person in the world, other than bin Laden himself, for what Osama became and did.

And he's now on TV talking about what a great thing it is that he's dead, without acknowledging an iota of guilt.

I agree that it's a good thing that Osama bin Laden is dead. But why should I care to listen to the guy that first came up with the idea of funding him with American dollars?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-02-11 06:48 AM
Response to Original message
1. Mr. PNAC
Edited on Mon May-02-11 06:58 AM by Hubert Flottz
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-02-11 06:56 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Really? Never listed on PNAC website....
Persons associated with the PNAC
Project directors



William Kristol, Co-founder and Chairman<1>
Robert Kagan, Co-founder<1>
Bruce P. Jackson<1>
Mark Gerson<1>
Randy Scheunemann<1>

Project staff

Ellen Bork, Deputy Director<1>
Gary Schmitt, Senior Fellow<1><49>
Thomas Donnelly, Senior Fellow<1>
Reuel Marc Gerecht, Senior Fellow<1>
Mitch Jackson, Senior Fellow
Timothy Lehmann, Assistant Director<1>
Michael Goldfarb, Research Associate<1>

Former directors and staff

Daniel McKivergan, Deputy Director<50>

Signatories to Statement of Principles

Elliott Abrams<5>
Gary Bauer<5>
William J. Bennett<5>
John Ellis "Jeb" Bush<5>
Richard B. Cheney<5>
Eliot A. Cohen<5>
Midge Decter<5>
Paula Dobriansky<5>
Steve Forbes<5>
Aaron Friedberg<5>
Francis Fukuyama<5>
Frank Gaffney<5>
Fred C. Ikle<5>
Donald Kagan<5>
Zalmay Khalilzad<5>
I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby<5>
Norman Podhoretz<5>
J. Danforth Quayle<5>
Peter W. Rodman<5>
Stephen P. Rosen<5>
Henry S. Rowen<5>
Donald Rumsfeld<5>
Vin Weber<5>
George Weigel<5>
Paul Wolfowitz<5>

Signatories or contributors to other significant letters or reports<14>

Elliott Abrams<8><10>
Kenneth Adelman<51>
Richard V. Allen<18>
Richard L. Armitage<10>
Gary Bauer<18><51>
Jeffrey Bell<18><51>
William J. Bennett<8><10><18><51>
Jeffrey Bergner<8><10><18>
John Bolton<8><10>
Ellen Bork<51>
Rudy Boschwitz<18>
Linda Chavez<51>
Eliot Cohen<13><18><51>
Seth Cropsey<18>
Midge Decter<18><51>
Paula Dobriansky<8><10>
Thomas Donnelly<13><18><51>
Nicholas Eberstadt,<18><51><52>
Hillel Fradkin<18><51><53>
Aaron Friedberg<18>
Francis Fukuyama<8><10><18>
Frank Gaffney<18><51>
Jeffrey Gedmin<18><51>
Reuel Marc Gerecht<18><51>
Charles Hill<18><51>
Bruce P. Jackson<18><51>
Eli S. Jacobs<18>
Michael Joyce<18>
Donald Kagan<13><18><51>
Robert Kagan<8><10><13><18><51>
Stephen Kantany</>
Zalmay Khalilzad<8><10>
Jeane Kirkpatrick<18>
Charles Krauthammer<18>
William Kristol<8><10><13><18>
John Lehman<18><51>
I. Lewis Libby<13>
Tod Lindberg<51><54>
Rich Lowry<51>
Clifford May<18><51>
John McCain<55>
Joshua Muravchik<51>
Michael O'Hanlon <56><57>
Martin Peretz<18><51>
Richard Perle<8><10><18><51>
Daniel Pipes<51>
Norman Podhoretz<18><51>
Peter W. Rodman<8><10><18>
Stephen P. Rosen<13><18><51>
Donald Rumsfeld<8><10>
Randy Scheunemann<18><51>
Gary Schmitt<13><18><49><51>
William Schneider, Jr.<8><10><18><51>
Richard H. Shultz<18><58>
Henry Sokolski<18>
Stephen J. Solarz<18>
Vin Weber<8><10><18>
Leon Wieseltier<18>
Marshall Wittmann<18><51>
Paul Wolfowitz<8><10><13>
R. James Woolsey<8><10><51>
Dov Zakheim<13><59>
Robert B. Zoellick<8><10>


****************
It is my understanding that he was an adversary to the NeoCons and PNAC. Not defending him in other areas, but I don't think you are correct.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-02-11 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #3
8.  Ideology mates?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-02-11 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Actually no...
If you google, you will see some rather disparaging comments form several PNACers about both Brzinsky and Madeline Albright. I think you are way off base on this one, though I'm no Brzinsky fan for his role in funding the Taliban.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-02-11 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. The PNAC plans closely adhere to "The Grand Chessboard".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Syrinx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-02-11 07:02 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. the enemy of my enemy is my friend
That hasn't really worked out for us as a governing philosophy. I hope we start to stray from it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
starroute Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-02-11 09:33 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. No, he was there well before PNAC
As I recall, back in 1979 he was the author of the "let's lure the Russians into an Afghan quagmire" strategy for Jimmy Carter.

And we all know how brilliantly that worked out.

I'm reminded of whichever Delphic oracle prophecy it was that told some Middle Eastern ruler, "If you invade Iran, a great empire will fall." Didn't mention that it was his own empire.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lostnfound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-02-11 06:52 AM
Response to Original message
2. "What is most important to the history of the world? Some stirred-up Moslems or end of cold war?"
I was about to post a thread titled "Definition of Irony" but I see you beat me to it.

Al Qaeda, 'the database'.

http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Zbigniew_Brzezinski

In a 1997 interview for CNN's Cold War Series, Brzezinski hinted about the Carter Administration's proactive Afghanistan policy before the Soviet invasion in 1979, that he had conceived.

Interviewer: How did you interpret Soviet behavior in Afghanistan, such as the April revolution, the rise of... I mean, what did you think their long-term plans were, and what did you think should be done about it?
Brzezinski: I told the President, about six months before the Soviets entered Afghanistan, that in my judgment I thought they would be going into Afghanistan. And I decided then, and I recommended to the President, that we shouldn't be passive.
Interviewer: What happened?
Brzezinski: We weren't passive.
The National Security Archive, Interview with Dr. Zbigniew Brzezinski, for CNN's Coldwar Series, June 13, 1997
7 months after the interview for the CNN series, Brzezinski, in a interview for the French publication, Le Nouvel Observateur, was more forthright, and unapologetically claimed to be the mastermind of a feint which caused the Soviet Union to embark upon a military intervention to support their client government in Kabul, as well as training and arming extremists, which later became the Taliban government.

Q: When the Soviets justified their intervention by asserting that they intended to fight against a secret involvement of the United States in Afghanistan, people didn't believe them. However, there was a basis of truth. You don't regret anything today?
Brzezinski: Regret what? That secret operation was an excellent idea. It had the effect of drawing the Russians into the Afghan trap and you want me to regret it? The day that the Soviets officially crossed the border, I wrote to President Carter: We now have the opportunity of giving to the USSR its Vietnam war. Indeed, for almost 10 years, Moscow had to carry on a war unsupportable by the government, a conflict that brought about the demoralization and finally the breakup of the Soviet empire.
Q: And neither do you regret having supported the Islamic , having given arms and advice to future terrorists?
Brzezinski: What is most important to the history of the world? The Taliban or the collapse of the Soviet empire? Some stirred-up Moslems or the liberation of Central Europe and the end of the cold war?
Le Nouvel Observateur, Interview with Dr. Zbigniew Brzezinski, Paris, January 15-21, 1998, translated by Bill Blum - <5>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walk away Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-02-11 07:42 AM
Response to Original message
5. I thought that show was off the air.
Didn't they leave television and start one of those wingnut radio shows?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fujiyama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-02-11 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
7. I'm kicking this
I'm tired of the cold war relic. He has his support even here. He hasn't been relevant in a long time and his thinking put US-Russia post Cold War relations back years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-02-11 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
10. Mr proto-PNAC himself!
Edited on Mon May-02-11 11:59 AM by Poboy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-02-11 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
12. I had to turn it off when all I saw was a parade of former-Bush people "explaining"
the whole thing..

Obama's people should have been out in force today with details given them by the WH...

This is the BIGGEST gripe I have with Obama's team.. They lay back and let Bushies fill the vacuum..

and we all know how Bushies LOVE camera-time..

By the time Obama's people start showing up, it';s always to be on defense about some idiotic thing a Bushie has pushed out into the spotlight..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-02-11 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Mika said that the Obama people were not available this morning for the show.
Mika said she could understand that and so can I. It was only the dumb repubs who obviously didn't know sh*t from shinola about this thing who were yapping. And desperately trying to come up with something that showed them as "knowledgeable." They came off a befuddled fools.

doncha know they are all so damn mad they could just explode!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 09:48 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC