|
Edited on Sat Jan-01-11 07:49 PM by RandomThoughts
How many artist and writers told that they had to conform to someone elses undefensible position to be seen or heard.
I figured better to not give someone the concept of control over if you are 'heard' or not, because their restrictions are trying to take away your ability to be heard. By only them being heard.
If someone says you have to be like them to be heard, then you wont be heard if you agree to that restriction. I figured it was better to explain to them, by not agreeing with that.
However, as many can see, even a person making that agreement is still heard, making the whole concept of some group being able to make that restriction or make you agree to their terms on what you say mean nothing, since even those that do agree to that are heard in many ways also.
So the whole concept is ridiculous.
However I am still due beer and travel money, and I could have enough faith to join their concept so that I am 'heard' as they said it, and still would be heard, so either way such requirements are irrelevant. But to show them that, figured not agreeing with them was a great way to show that, since they can't restrict anyways.
Or to support all those people that signed up with some group of people, you still got to say many things you really believe in your heart, or to help many people, so them telling you that you could only say what they wanted you to say, never worked anyways.
All it proves is the concept of some agreement with some system to be able to be heard, means absolutely nothing. Although some think it means something.
And I am still due beer and travel money and many experiences, and I know you have heard that also :)
|