|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
Playinghardball (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-11-11 07:50 PM Original message |
WikiLeaks gags staff, threatens leakers with $20 million penalty |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ecstatic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-11-11 07:51 PM Response to Original message |
1. Ironic nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-11-11 07:53 PM Response to Original message |
2. Deleted message |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-11-11 07:54 PM Response to Original message |
3. So they OWN the documents that are illegally leaked to them? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vanje (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-11-11 07:54 PM Response to Original message |
4. That is Ironic nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MineralMan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-11-11 07:55 PM Response to Original message |
5. Uh-huh....the real motive emerges, I think. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-11-11 10:07 PM Response to Reply #5 |
25. This is long known about. This is not particularly new. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-11-11 11:19 PM Response to Reply #25 |
40. No it is not, the exact opposite is true. I see you have fallen |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ecstatic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-12-11 06:54 PM Response to Reply #40 |
50. What I don't get is your constant attempts to defend those people |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NavyDem (284 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-11-11 07:57 PM Response to Original message |
6. This thread makes me LOL. N/T |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MineralMan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-11-11 07:58 PM Response to Original message |
7. I guess that explains his lack of support for Private Manning, then. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-11-11 08:24 PM Response to Reply #7 |
11. Working the bait hard in his thread. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-11-11 08:29 PM Response to Reply #11 |
13. Fun to watch though, isn't it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-12-11 01:16 AM Response to Reply #13 |
45. Yes. It's like a Hugo Chavez thread about Wikileaks. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-11-11 08:27 PM Response to Reply #7 |
12. No, it doesn't but it explains how much danger he is in from |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-11-11 10:12 PM Response to Reply #12 |
28. This is *not* controversial: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-12-11 12:40 AM Response to Reply #28 |
41. From 'Wired'?? January? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cbdo2007 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-11-11 08:04 PM Response to Original message |
8. "valuable proprietary commercial information" - yep, that about sums it up ($$$) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-11-11 08:43 PM Response to Reply #8 |
14. What money is Wikileaks going get, or have |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-11-11 10:09 PM Response to Reply #14 |
26. Wikileaks is fine at silencing itself. Less than 5% or so of the Manning Files have been released. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-11-11 11:15 PM Response to Reply #26 |
39. Wow, you are so off base and so uninformed about this story |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Arctic Dave (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-11-11 08:16 PM Response to Original message |
9. Oh dog, NTSA. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
comtec (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-11-11 08:19 PM Response to Original message |
10. Makes sense... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stevenleser (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-11-11 10:05 PM Response to Reply #10 |
24. Assange himself has admitted that Wikileaks has cost lives. MANY lives |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Leopolds Ghost (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-11-11 10:11 PM Response to Reply #24 |
27. Wait, so you're angry about the Middle Eastern uprising? By that logic, ending VN War cost lives |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stevenleser (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-12-11 11:28 AM Response to Reply #27 |
47. Nope, not angry, quite the opposite. But the fact is that wikileaks has resulted in deaths. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
girl gone mad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-11-11 10:12 PM Response to Reply #24 |
29. So you think the uprisings were a bad thing? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stevenleser (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-13-11 08:59 AM Response to Reply #29 |
52. No I don't. See my #47 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-11-11 10:24 PM Response to Reply #24 |
32. Wikileaks has stated openly that Wikileaks contributed to the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stevenleser (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-13-11 09:05 AM Response to Reply #32 |
53. None of what you wrote changes the basic fact. Without wikileaks, those revolutions would not have |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
comtec (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-12-11 12:49 AM Response to Reply #24 |
43. death by revolution is not the same as outing a undercover agent |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stevenleser (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-12-11 11:29 AM Response to Reply #43 |
48. You can attempt to try to spin it away any way you like. Wikileaks still caused deaths |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fla_Democrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-11-11 08:46 PM Response to Original message |
15. Bwahahaha |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
renegade000 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-11-11 08:52 PM Response to Original message |
16. lol n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kaleko (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-11-11 09:03 PM Response to Original message |
17. If I was a whistleblower with a major cache of documents to disclose, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ohbill (30 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-11-11 09:09 PM Response to Reply #17 |
18. Name one whistleblower who has made a similar demand. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kaleko (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-11-11 09:22 PM Response to Reply #18 |
19. Whistleblower's names are kept completely secret from WikiLeaks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-11-11 09:39 PM Response to Reply #18 |
21. Wikileaks has not taken money from media outlets and that has |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Robb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-11-11 09:55 PM Response to Reply #21 |
22. Le Monde, no. But BBC 4 paid £50,000. Al Jazeera £100,000. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-11-11 10:42 PM Response to Reply #22 |
34. That appears to be an allegation that was not true. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-11-11 09:35 PM Response to Reply #17 |
20. Me too. But we are in the process of smearing Wikileaks, so shhh |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-11-11 10:18 PM Response to Reply #20 |
31. It is not a smear to point out facts. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-11-11 10:51 PM Response to Reply #31 |
36. And the facts are? What money did Wikileaks receive as a result |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kaleko (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-11-11 10:41 PM Response to Reply #20 |
33. I'm amazed to see Raw Story run with such a sloppy attempt at a "scoop". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-11-11 10:55 PM Response to Reply #33 |
37. I agree, very transparent attempt at a smear. I guess HBGary's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
La Lioness Priyanka (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-11-11 09:57 PM Response to Original message |
23. he had a right to want to protect people who are leaking this stuff |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Leopolds Ghost (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-11-11 10:13 PM Response to Original message |
30. Let me get this straight: WikiLeaks staff leaked an order prohibiting them to leak WikiLeaks? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SidDithers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-11-11 10:44 PM Response to Original message |
35. Well, that's awkward...nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-11-11 10:59 PM Response to Reply #35 |
38. Yes, a very awkward attempt at a smear. HBGary's exposure |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-12-11 12:43 AM Response to Reply #35 |
42. Funny how people use/abuse rawstory when it suits their needs. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-12-11 01:04 AM Response to Reply #42 |
44. Rawstory simply copied and pasted the ridiculous piece of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-12-11 10:24 AM Response to Reply #35 |
46. It was awkward watching the OP try to discredit Wikileaks, I agree. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stevenleser (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-13-11 08:56 AM Response to Reply #35 |
51. But what is more awkward are the wikileaks' defenders trying to explain this away. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Incitatus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-12-11 11:35 AM Response to Original message |
49. Maybe they have some documents that shouldn't be released. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Oct 17th 2024, 11:46 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC