|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
![]() |
The Backlash Cometh
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 10:15 AM Original message |
Can someone explain in plain language what all these meltdowns in Japan mean? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flamingdem
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 10:26 AM Response to Original message |
1. I googled for the basics and found this: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Backlash Cometh
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 10:31 AM Response to Reply #1 |
3. So they're trying to keep it from exploding because it will add radiation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flamingdem
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 10:35 AM Response to Reply #3 |
4. Regardless it will spew radiation locally for a very long time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Backlash Cometh
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 10:39 AM Response to Reply #4 |
5. I predict in five years, that the right-wingers will be adding the Japanese |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JuniperLea
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 10:42 AM Response to Reply #5 |
6. That's what the Regressives do... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Backlash Cometh
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 10:44 AM Response to Reply #6 |
7. I wouldn't mind being proven wrong every now and then. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JuniperLea
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 10:51 AM Response to Reply #7 |
8. I know... it sucks to be right sometimes... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CoffeeCat
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 11:26 AM Response to Reply #1 |
13. I've also read that Fukushima has ten times more... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Uben
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 10:27 AM Response to Original message |
2. Oops! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HubertHeaver
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 11:00 AM Response to Original message |
9. In layman's terms, it means we are cooked. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
azul
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 11:16 AM Response to Original message |
10. It means that secrecy is as dead as a doornail |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krispos42
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 11:23 AM Response to Original message |
11. The fuel melted |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Backlash Cometh
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 11:39 AM Response to Reply #11 |
14. Thank you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jeff47
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 11:43 AM Response to Reply #11 |
16. Not remotely close to accurate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krispos42
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 11:58 AM Response to Reply #16 |
18. Care to explain? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jeff47
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 12:18 PM Response to Reply #18 |
20. Well, first, the radiation is not making oxygen and nitrogen radioactive. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uppityperson
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 12:41 PM Response to Reply #20 |
28. THANK you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Leopolds Ghost
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 12:48 PM Response to Reply #20 |
33. Good to know you think this is a local problem and doesn't affect us |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jeff47
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 04:10 PM Response to Reply #33 |
51. So it's wrong to explain that one group is affected more than another? (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JuniperLea
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 12:52 PM Response to Reply #20 |
36. I'm bookmarking this... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krispos42
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 12:52 PM Response to Reply #20 |
37. Ah, a good answer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jeff47
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 03:57 PM Response to Reply #37 |
49. Again, radioactivity does not work that way. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flamingdem
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 05:46 PM Response to Reply #49 |
55. Three of the nukes are spewing white smoke as of this morning nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jeff47
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 07:25 AM Response to Reply #55 |
64. Link? (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flamingdem
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 08:20 AM Response to Reply #64 |
65. Check out Arnie Gundersen's video posted by bananas here today at minute 4 nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jeff47
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 05:42 PM Response to Reply #65 |
69. Ah, Arnie. Got a real link? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flamingdem
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 12:54 PM Response to Reply #20 |
39. You are wrong. All you have to do is look at EPA and UC Berkeley testing nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jeff47
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 04:00 PM Response to Reply #39 |
50. Testing what? Presence of radioactivity? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flamingdem
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 05:57 PM Response to Reply #50 |
60. Why do you think that is so important? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jeff47
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 07:17 AM Response to Reply #60 |
61. Because the difference is extremely important |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flamingdem
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 05:51 PM Response to Reply #20 |
57. Please checkout Tetuso Matsui's analysis about nuclear chain reactions |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jeff47
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 07:19 AM Response to Reply #57 |
62. And as I keep saying, that doesn't really change what you do with the plant |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NNN0LHI
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 11:25 AM Response to Original message |
12. I highly recommend reading this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truebrit71
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 11:41 AM Response to Original message |
15. Thanks I asked the same question in another thread... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jeff47
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 12:08 PM Response to Reply #15 |
19. What we're talking about is this: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NNN0LHI
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 12:21 PM Response to Reply #19 |
21. Does the neutron beam observed 13 times, 1.5 kilometers from the plant indicate criticality? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jeff47
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 12:24 PM Response to Reply #21 |
22. It's the evidence for uranium fission occuring |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NNN0LHI
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 12:32 PM Response to Reply #22 |
23. Keep pumping for how long? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jeff47
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 12:36 PM Response to Reply #23 |
25. Admittedly I oversimplified the pumping operation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flamingdem
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 12:55 PM Response to Reply #23 |
40. Yes, and much worse because there is a leak, so they have to fill fill and dump nuked waste nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robdogbucky
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 12:32 PM Response to Reply #22 |
24. Nice try, but your explanations don't wash |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jeff47
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 12:37 PM Response to Reply #24 |
27. So....the laws of physics don't exist. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Leopolds Ghost
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 01:05 PM Response to Reply #22 |
41. Do you feel this is worse or much less serious than Chernobyl? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jeff47
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 03:37 PM Response to Reply #41 |
47. Much, much less |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flamingdem
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 05:52 PM Response to Reply #21 |
58. This thread is about a Japanese scientist who has evidence chain reaction has been occurring |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wiggs
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 12:45 PM Response to Reply #19 |
31. Is radioactive iodine an issue here? I realize it may not be the same order of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jeff47
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 03:44 PM Response to Reply #31 |
48. I really can't answer that for you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Edweird
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 04:15 PM Response to Reply #19 |
53. IIRC, there aren't any 'concrete pite under the reactors'. It's going to hit ground water. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flamingdem
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 05:54 PM Response to Reply #53 |
59. Where did you read that? I've been trying to find that info thanks nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flamingdem
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 05:49 PM Response to Reply #19 |
56. Are you sure there is a concrete pit under each reactor? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jeff47
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 07:20 AM Response to Reply #56 |
63. The only addition of concrete I'm aware of is to repair the concrete under reactor #3. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BOG PERSON
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 11:48 AM Response to Original message |
17. each of us will have a cool superpower very soon |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jtuck004
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 12:36 PM Response to Original message |
26. Drumbeat of Nuclear Fallout Fear Doesn't Resound Wtih Experts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uppityperson
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 12:43 PM Response to Reply #26 |
29. Thank you also. For those near Fukushima, it is terrible. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JuniperLea
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 12:50 PM Response to Reply #26 |
34. Nuclear industry PR... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Leopolds Ghost
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 12:51 PM Response to Reply #26 |
35. So this disaster is officially nowhere near as bad as Chernobyl? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
progressoid
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 12:44 PM Response to Original message |
30. ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Leopolds Ghost
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 12:53 PM Response to Reply #30 |
38. Even worse... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Keith Bee
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 12:45 PM Response to Original message |
32. Ug! God ANGRY! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 02:26 PM Response to Original message |
42. k |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 02:29 PM Response to Original message |
43. it means a lot of people are posting misleading articles from the western press |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NNN0LHI
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 02:40 PM Response to Reply #43 |
44. I read Japans state run media arm(NHK) every day first thing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 02:42 PM Response to Reply #44 |
45. then you must have noticed the differences between the nhk story of the 12th |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NNN0LHI
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 02:58 PM Response to Reply #45 |
46. I expected differences |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jpak
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 08:44 AM Response to Reply #43 |
67. It means the pollyannas were wrong and the accident is NOT over and large amounts of radioactivity |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Odin2005
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 04:14 PM Response to Original message |
52. I believe it is the classic meltdown scenario, like Chernobyl. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flamingdem
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 05:43 PM Response to Reply #52 |
54. This one at least has a containment structure |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jpak
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 08:42 AM Response to Original message |
66. It means that everything is OK and we can build more nukes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 08:49 AM Response to Original message |
68. It means the truth will come out with the births from the second generation hence. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 07:58 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC