|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
![]() |
The Northerner
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 12:51 PM Original message |
Bin Laden death 'not an assassination' - Eric Holder |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ixion
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 12:53 PM Response to Original message |
1. Well, yeah, it was, actually, Mr. Holder |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 12:55 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. No, it wasn't. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ixion
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 02:23 PM Response to Reply #2 |
37. whatever |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Xicano
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 06:28 PM Response to Reply #2 |
56. So the President sent Navy Seals there to serve an arrest warrant? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stevenleser
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 12:59 AM Response to Reply #56 |
93. So, the military taking prisoners is a foreign concept to you? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HereSince1628
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 01:41 PM Response to Reply #1 |
18. It was a homicide by shooting, it eliminated a state enemy, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stevenleser
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 10:07 AM Response to Reply #18 |
120. Motive is always a big issue in a killing and makes all the difference in prosecution/punishment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HereSince1628
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 11:38 AM Response to Reply #120 |
121. As I see it part of the problem is that Obama referred to 'justice' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JDPriestly
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 01:58 PM Response to Reply #1 |
28. They probably made videos of it, so whether it was or not will becomeA |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ecstatic
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 07:20 PM Response to Reply #1 |
59. Too bad you weren't a member of that Seal team. You could have personally |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 08:21 PM Response to Reply #59 |
67. So now you have to be a Navy SEAL to have an opinion? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ecstatic
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 08:51 PM Response to Reply #67 |
70. No, but I take Holder at his word when he says they were open to capture |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ixion
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 08:53 PM Response to Reply #70 |
71. LOL... not a chance |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 08:57 PM Response to Reply #71 |
73. "Nothing, and I mean NOTHING a government official says is ever true" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stevenleser
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 01:01 AM Response to Reply #73 |
94. Ron Paul agrees with the assassination meme and he is a government official, so I guess that person |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ixion
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 06:08 AM Response to Reply #73 |
116. It may be funny, but it is also true. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 08:09 AM Response to Reply #116 |
118. "which means you believed everything Bushco said, correct? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ecstatic
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 10:18 PM Response to Reply #71 |
79. I understand the need to be skeptical, but people who automatically believe Bin Laden's son |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ixion
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 06:07 AM Response to Reply #79 |
115. Your statement implies that I said I believe bin Laden. This is incorrect. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 09:03 PM Response to Reply #70 |
75. It is a little silly to think McChystal's assassination program |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aquart
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 12:56 PM Response to Original message |
3. I think of it as good, clean fun. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Solomon
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 12:57 PM Response to Original message |
4. As I said: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 01:12 PM Response to Reply #4 |
8. No one objected to our worldwide torture program either. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Solomon
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 01:26 PM Response to Reply #8 |
12. Now that is just not true. Even England's foreign secretary, among others, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 01:28 PM Response to Reply #12 |
14. The UK helped with rendition so their position isn't transparent, is it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Spider Jerusalem
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 02:23 PM Response to Reply #12 |
38. England has no foreign secretary. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Enrique
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 01:02 PM Response to Original message |
5. because assassinations are legally problematic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Leopolds Ghost
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 01:15 PM Response to Reply #5 |
10. Isn't it odd that top Democratic leaders are the only people taking our concern seriously? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Uncle Joe
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 01:03 PM Response to Original message |
6. I want to believe them but for PR purposes I would suggest they reverse the term |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gregorian
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 01:09 PM Response to Original message |
7. I don't know what it was. I do know a "LIVE" Bin Laden would be a big problem. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 01:13 PM Response to Original message |
9. That settles it, then. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Canuckistanian
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 01:17 PM Response to Original message |
11. What's he been smoking? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mnemosyne
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 01:28 PM Response to Original message |
13. No, Eric, it was an execution. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 01:29 PM Response to Reply #13 |
15. No, it wasn't an execution. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mnemosyne
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 03:50 PM Response to Reply #15 |
48. Believe whatever spin you wish. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
coalition_unwilling
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 01:36 PM Response to Original message |
16. The only reason Holder is even saying this is that the administration |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 01:38 PM Response to Reply #16 |
17. "big time war crime" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
coalition_unwilling
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 01:43 PM Response to Reply #17 |
19. Buh-bye, dude. - n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 01:44 PM Response to Reply #19 |
20. In other words... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 01:51 PM Response to Reply #20 |
24. Prove it wasn't! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
coalition_unwilling
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 01:53 PM Response to Reply #24 |
26. The burdent of proof is on he or she who makes the accusation (in this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 02:05 PM Response to Reply #26 |
30. Which is longhand for... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 02:09 PM Response to Reply #26 |
32. Yes, that was my thought also. You were clearly offering |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
coalition_unwilling
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 02:14 PM Response to Reply #32 |
34. If SDuderstadt really believes Obama has nothing to hide and is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 02:23 PM Response to Reply #34 |
39. Yes I agree, pointless to discuss issues with anyone who |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 04:29 PM Response to Reply #39 |
51. Maybe spirited and vigorous debate just isn't... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 04:39 PM Response to Reply #51 |
52. Lol! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 06:05 PM Response to Reply #52 |
53. "things aren't going his way" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 07:10 PM Response to Reply #53 |
57. Support for drone attacks = Support for the deaths of innocent people! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 07:16 PM Response to Reply #57 |
58. Deleted message |
sabrina 1
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 07:30 PM Response to Reply #58 |
60. Then go ahead and do it. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 08:03 PM Response to Reply #60 |
63. Deleted message |
sabrina 1
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 08:19 PM Response to Reply #63 |
66. You have provided no proof that your support of the use of drones |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 08:55 PM Response to Reply #66 |
72. Deleted message |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 09:20 PM Response to Reply #66 |
76. Last time, Sabrina... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 10:59 PM Response to Reply #76 |
86. Two people whose ids we do not know, but some 'official' claims |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 11:02 PM Response to Reply #86 |
88. Do you have evidence that they were.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalLovinLug
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 01:03 AM Response to Reply #88 |
95. Wosh |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 01:24 AM Response to Reply #95 |
97. Maybe you should read the... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 01:37 AM Response to Reply #97 |
100. You have no evidence. No one is fooled by your games of avoidance. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 01:40 AM Response to Reply #100 |
101. No, I'm playing by your rules... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 01:50 AM Response to Reply #101 |
102. No, you don't have to. But you would if you could and that is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 01:53 AM Response to Reply #102 |
103. Deleted message |
sabrina 1
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 02:17 AM Response to Reply #103 |
108. I play by the rule of law. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 02:19 AM Response to Reply #108 |
109. I do, too... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 02:21 AM Response to Reply #109 |
110. Yes, Bush's law, sadly! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 02:23 AM Response to Reply #110 |
111. Nope... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 02:38 AM Response to Reply #108 |
113. Obama plays by the rule of law.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 02:07 AM Response to Reply #101 |
106. Deleted message |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 02:10 AM Response to Reply #106 |
107. I see you don't like.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 01:32 AM Response to Reply #88 |
98. What are their names? Who are they? How old were they? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 01:35 AM Response to Reply #98 |
99. Deleted sub-thread |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 03:29 AM Response to Reply #98 |
114. Their names are... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 11:21 PM Response to Reply #86 |
90. Deleted message |
Name removed
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 06:25 AM Response to Reply #90 |
117. Deleted message |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 10:25 PM Response to Reply #39 |
81. "pov that there is no room for discussion" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 02:07 PM Response to Reply #24 |
31. Deleted message |
sabrina 1
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 02:15 PM Response to Reply #31 |
35. I did not expect any proof since we have had no trials |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 03:00 PM Response to Reply #35 |
42. That's really brilliant, Sabrina! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 03:22 PM Response to Reply #42 |
43. Isn't that what you have been saying all along? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 03:38 PM Response to Reply #43 |
44. Umm, no... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 04:14 PM Response to Reply #44 |
49. I guess I missed all that evidence then? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 04:27 PM Response to Reply #49 |
50. "Not playing" = "not responding to stupid strawman arguments" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Swede
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 03:44 PM Response to Reply #20 |
46. Uh-oh,now you've done it. You are now in coalition_unwilling's ignore list. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 09:31 PM Response to Reply #46 |
77. I wear it as... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 06:20 PM Response to Reply #20 |
55. Maybe he just doesn't want to engage with you. I don't blame him. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 08:10 PM Response to Reply #55 |
64. Deleted message |
Bluebear
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 06:19 PM Response to Reply #19 |
54. + |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ecstatic
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 10:20 PM Response to Reply #17 |
80. Don't waste your time: “Liberal” Sock Puppets – Right Wing/Corporate Operatives Attacking Democrats |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tritsofme
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 07:51 PM Response to Reply #16 |
62. Give me a break. OBL was a legitimate military target. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
coalition_unwilling
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 11:50 PM Response to Reply #62 |
91. Even the White House now admits OBL was unarmed. He may have |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 02:03 AM Response to Reply #91 |
105. Common Article 3 applies unambiguously. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fly by night
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 01:48 PM Response to Original message |
21. One in the chest, one in the head. Good thing he wasn't armed: might have shot himself a 3rd time. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fla_Democrat
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 01:48 PM Response to Original message |
22. Water boarding; 'not torture' - Alberto Gonzales |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 01:50 PM Response to Original message |
23. United Nations Special Rapporteurs statement on bin Laden |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leveymg
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 01:52 PM Response to Original message |
25. Okay. Let's call it an "enhanced immobilization technique", not two in the eye at close range. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EOTE
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 02:21 PM Response to Reply #25 |
36. Yep, pretty much. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalLovinLug
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 01:53 PM Response to Original message |
27. LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JustABozoOnThisBus
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 02:45 PM Response to Reply #27 |
40. You got it! He shot himself! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nichomachus
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 02:04 PM Response to Original message |
29. It was just a multi-level marketing call gone horribly wrong |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
coalition_unwilling
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 02:10 PM Response to Reply #29 |
33. Now your post is seriously deserving of a DUzy. Wickedly brilliant, or |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
azul
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 02:55 PM Response to Original message |
41. Like UN statment said, it sets a precedent if left to stand as acceptable. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadHound
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 03:43 PM Response to Original message |
45. I see Holder has been excelling at those courses in Advanced Bushspeak. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Swede
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 03:47 PM Response to Original message |
47. Of course it wasn't. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PurityOfEssence
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 07:38 PM Response to Original message |
61. Enhanced Suppression |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tekisui
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 08:16 PM Response to Original message |
65. "No one in the main building got off a shot or was even armed" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
coalition_unwilling
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 01:18 AM Response to Reply #65 |
96. It's not the summary execution that gets you, it's the cover-up. (My |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Exilednight
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 08:25 PM Response to Original message |
68. "Waterboarding is not torture:" - John Woo Anyone else notice |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tekisui
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 08:34 PM Response to Reply #68 |
69. Yep. It's not illegal when the President's man say it isn't'. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProgressIn2008
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 09:00 PM Response to Reply #69 |
74. Pretty much. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
deaniac21
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 09:52 PM Response to Original message |
78. Holder in March 2010.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hulka38
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 11:18 PM Response to Reply #78 |
89. That's a great find. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Leopolds Ghost
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 02:25 AM Response to Reply #78 |
112. Interesting. What does Holder have to say about "read rights to a corpse" in light of remarks above? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hulka38
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 10:33 PM Response to Original message |
82. Pure bullshit. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ramulux
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 10:46 PM Response to Original message |
83. I was unaware... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
themadstork
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 11:00 PM Response to Reply #83 |
87. It's weird that the executive branch has become its own oversight. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Amonester
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 10:51 PM Response to Original message |
84. I agree. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
themadstork
![]() |
Thu May-12-11 10:56 PM Response to Original message |
85. Well, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bonobo
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 12:38 AM Response to Original message |
92. And enhanced interrogation is not torture according to John Yoo nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 01:56 AM Response to Original message |
104. How can that be? We shot a sweet, "gently smiling", "little old man in his jammies" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 08:38 AM Response to Original message |
119. He wasn't armed. He resisted. He was shot. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gratuitous
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 11:41 AM Response to Original message |
122. This is the same AG who ended the Ensign investigation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 07:51 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC