|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
![]() |
howard112211
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 09:31 AM Original message |
Gosh, the "wuy isun't wikileaks transparunt" meme will not die will it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
YellowRubberDuckie
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 09:31 AM Response to Original message |
1. If stuff is still leaking, doesn't that mean that the kid they are torturing... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yodermon
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 10:47 AM Response to Reply #1 |
11. as I understand it, WL plus the other news orgs that have the cables |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stevenleser
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 09:35 AM Response to Original message |
2. Can't explain away the idea that the organization that tries to force transparency isn't transparent |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polly7
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 09:40 AM Response to Reply #2 |
3. I can. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
howard112211
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 09:41 AM Response to Reply #2 |
4. That doesn't even make any sense. Why should they be? They are not "forcing transparency" per se. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xchrom
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 09:44 AM Response to Reply #4 |
5. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stevenleser
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 10:01 AM Response to Reply #4 |
7. You can spin as much as you want, this hypocrisy is impossible to resolve. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
howard112211
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 10:15 AM Response to Reply #7 |
9. No, they are not saying that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stevenleser
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 10:34 AM Response to Reply #9 |
10. I have tens of thousands of leaks made without apology that say that. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yodermon
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 10:50 AM Response to Reply #7 |
12. Is wikileaks arguing that other news orgs must reveal their sources??? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stevenleser
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 11:12 AM Response to Reply #12 |
13. Have other news orgs made it their mission to force full transparency on everyone else? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fascisthunter
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 09:45 AM Response to Reply #2 |
6. um, at some point one must come to a comclusion that some are just opposed to certain things |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 10:05 AM Response to Original message |
8. Yep. In fact it is transparency in a sense. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 07:40 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC