|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
![]() |
malaise
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 12:15 PM Original message |
Rachel on ANdrea Mitchell now - Ensign and Coburn |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Shagbark Hickory
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 12:16 PM Response to Original message |
1. RW propaganda in diguise, nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aquart
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 12:38 PM Response to Reply #1 |
5. From rachel? REALLY? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
malaise
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 12:47 PM Response to Reply #5 |
7. Of course |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Shagbark Hickory
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 05:57 PM Response to Reply #5 |
22. Sure, they're all reading from the scripts handed to them. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jillan
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 12:18 PM Response to Original message |
2. I would love to see that weasel Coburn get taken down over this. I can't stand him. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
malaise
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 12:20 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. Wouldn't we all |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 12:50 PM Response to Reply #3 |
9. Rachel's lovin' it! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SpiralHawk
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 12:59 PM Response to Reply #9 |
13. "The Family" (R) is clearly Faux Christian (R) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SidDithers
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 06:00 PM Response to Reply #13 |
23. No. "The Family" is not Faux Christian. They're Christian...nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
malaise
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 01:04 PM Response to Reply #9 |
14. Not sure she's loving it more than me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MatthewStLouis
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 02:09 PM Response to Reply #2 |
20. Coburn reminds me of an ugly rooster. Cocky with lizard skin underneath the feathers. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DainBramaged
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 12:20 PM Response to Original message |
4. XM117 folks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
malaise
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 12:48 PM Response to Reply #4 |
8. Please explain |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Diamonique
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 12:52 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. I'm guessing MSNBC airs on XM radio station 117? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
malaise
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 12:55 PM Response to Reply #10 |
11. Thanks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DainBramaged
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 02:00 PM Response to Reply #8 |
19. I'm sorry for taking so long |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Diamonique
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 12:40 PM Response to Original message |
6. I hope Coburn goes down with Ensign. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
livetohike
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 12:57 PM Response to Reply #6 |
12. Santorum too n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
monmouth
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 01:22 PM Response to Reply #12 |
15. YES!!! Little ricky ran to Ensign to give him a headsup on this and I |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
livetohike
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 06:20 PM Response to Reply #15 |
24. It would be great to see him do some time in jail |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarlib
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 01:32 PM Response to Original message |
16. Maybe instead of taking such delight in a stupid sexual scandal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 01:34 PM Response to Reply #16 |
17. I hope they will now! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
malaise
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 01:34 PM Response to Reply #16 |
18. More details became available |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Melinda
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 02:38 PM Response to Reply #16 |
21. Senate Ethics committee wanted first shot at Ensign, Justice Dept took backseat till' ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 07:25 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC