|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
![]() |
LoZoccolo
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 02:15 PM Original message |
If the year was 1992, I would sign Ross Perot's ballot petition. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dr Fate
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 02:24 PM Response to Original message |
1. And if it was 2006, you would be supporting Joe Lieberman (I-3rd party)? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 02:30 PM Response to Reply #1 |
5. Judging by my DU posts, which anybody can look up, I would not support Joe Lieberman. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dr Fate
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 02:32 PM Response to Reply #5 |
10. Judging by your OP, I thought you were expressing support for conservative 3rd parties. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 02:35 PM Response to Reply #10 |
13. I support ballot access for conservative third parties. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dr Fate
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 02:36 PM Response to Reply #13 |
14. I was just thinking back to your openly pro-DLC days. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 02:25 PM Response to Original message |
2. perot = spoiler for the dems. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dr Fate
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 02:26 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. Just like Lieberman's DLC sponsored run was a spoiler for the nominated DEM. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sharp_stick
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 02:32 PM Response to Reply #3 |
8. Well not really |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dr Fate
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 02:34 PM Response to Reply #8 |
12. As far as the end results go, yes, really. The DEMS lost, the DLC sponsored 3rd party won. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 02:30 PM Response to Reply #2 |
6. That is demonstrably false. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 02:32 PM Response to Reply #6 |
9. is it? demonstrate it then. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 02:34 PM Response to Reply #9 |
11. Are you sure you want me to do this? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 02:37 PM Response to Reply #9 |
15. You did? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 02:42 PM Response to Reply #15 |
17. yes, i did. i don't much care what *you* believe, however |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ozymanithrax
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 02:30 PM Response to Original message |
4. Perot was a spoiler for Republicans in 1992 and 1996... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 02:31 PM Response to Reply #4 |
7. That is speculation. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ozymanithrax
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 02:51 PM Response to Reply #7 |
19. Since that time, it has been the best speculation... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DefenseLawyer
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 02:52 PM Response to Reply #7 |
20. It's only speculation for Clinton apologists |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 03:00 PM Response to Reply #20 |
22. I agree with you here, and with the subject of the post to which I responded. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 02:48 PM Response to Reply #4 |
18. my meaning was "a spoiler 'for' (for the interest of) dems" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ozymanithrax
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 02:56 PM Response to Reply #18 |
21. If you look at him on the issues... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 03:05 PM Response to Reply #21 |
23. ok, gotcha & agreed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftstreet
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 03:11 PM Response to Reply #21 |
24. Very true |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ozymanithrax
![]() |
Fri May-13-11 02:39 PM Response to Original message |
16. Ross Perot, on the issues... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 07:37 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC