I honestly don't care if it comes down to Obama vs Paul
LLStarks
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-13-11 06:22 PM
Original message |
I honestly don't care if it comes down to Obama vs Paul |
|
Edited on Fri May-13-11 06:23 PM by LLStarks
1. The GOP loses either way 2. No risk of Palin becoming president 3. It's porn for politics buffs 4. Congress will keep either winner in check
|
Taverner
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-13-11 06:25 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Or do we have the choice of Les Paul?
:)
|
LLStarks
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-13-11 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. Ron, of course. His son needs to bake for another 20 years or more. nt |
Drale
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-13-11 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
3. I hope Les Paul doesn't run |
|
because that would mean we would have a Zombie president and I don't think any of use are ready to only eat brains.:rofl:
|
tridim
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-13-11 06:35 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
7. I'm voting for Leo Fender. nt |
Wait Wut
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-13-11 06:31 PM
Response to Original message |
|
...and it wasn't in reference to OBL. I think you have to be banned for that.
On another disturbing note...you used the word porn in an indirect reference to Obama and Paul. I know who will come out on top, but now I need brain bleach.
|
ThatPoetGuy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-13-11 06:32 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Ron Paul's a libertarian, and he's convincing. The louder his bullhorn, the more harm he does.
Remember when Dan Quayle spoke about "family values"? That crap polluted the national discourse for years. I could do without Ron Paul's Ayn Rand crap at the center of the national debate.
|
stevenleser
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-13-11 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
6. Exactly. Objectivism and Laissez-Faireism spoken from the bully pulpit would be a disaster |
|
A fair amount of Americans listen to what the President says.
|
LLStarks
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-13-11 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
8. A President Paul would be in no position to implement his vision short of a supermajority. nt |
stevenleser
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-13-11 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
9. You are probably right. It still subjects us to non-stop ranting about his philosophy and as I said |
|
a fair percentage will be persuaded by him.
|
blondeatlast
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-13-11 06:53 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
10. Oh, dear God. Intolerable. |
|
I'm already subjected to plenty of it in my own social circle--on a national level, I would have to escape. :banghead:
|
elfin
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-13-11 08:26 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Gonna be Huntsman and that will be a problem for Obama.
Huntsman has been "distancing" himself from Mormonism - or at least that is what he is convincing MSM he has done. Truckloads of personal and Mormon and traditional Koch Kash.
Smart, decent hair, beautiful family and WHITE.
He will sneak in after the others go down in flames. Romney being taken out of the picture more and more each day. Mittens was his only serious competition.
This is my prediction (which I have made before) and I'm sticking to it.
Hope I am wrong.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 07:42 PM
Response to Original message |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.