|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
Xicano (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-13-11 09:04 PM Original message |
"Court: No right to Resist Illegal Cop Entry Into Home" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FiveGoodMen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-13-11 09:06 PM Response to Original message |
1. "Overturning a common law dating back to the English Magna Carta" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RagAss (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-13-11 09:06 PM Response to Original message |
2. Sorry Hoosiers. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
randr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-13-11 09:07 PM Response to Original message |
3. Is there any question about the republican stand on privacy? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uppityperson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-13-11 09:10 PM Response to Original message |
4. What. The. Bloody. Hell? Has he READ the 4th amendment recently? Here... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JDPriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-13-11 10:00 PM Response to Reply #4 |
16. Indiana is now officially the Fascist capitol of the United States. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Trekologer (445 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-13-11 09:11 PM Response to Original message |
5. This is both easy and hard to disagree with |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uppityperson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-13-11 09:12 PM Response to Reply #5 |
7. DV has special rules and this ruling is too broad. eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elleng (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-13-11 09:15 PM Response to Reply #5 |
8. 'public policy' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
notesdev (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-13-11 09:17 PM Response to Reply #5 |
9. Were that true there would be probable cause |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Xicano (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-13-11 09:23 PM Response to Reply #9 |
12. Exactly.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WingDinger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-13-11 09:22 PM Response to Reply #5 |
11. That is the excuse they use to barge in. Did it to me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalFighter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-13-11 10:08 PM Response to Reply #11 |
17. You might want to elaborate just a tad more. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
notesdev (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-13-11 09:12 PM Response to Original message |
6. "allowing resistance" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Curmudgeoness (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-13-11 09:21 PM Response to Original message |
10. Where do they get the judges who are sitting on some of these courts? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
niyad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-13-11 09:29 PM Response to Reply #10 |
13. this particular genius was appointed by mitch daniels |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dawson Leery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-13-11 09:33 PM Response to Original message |
14. A Republican appointee most likely. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
niyad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-13-11 09:44 PM Response to Reply #14 |
15. as I said, a mitch daniels appt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
naaman fletcher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-14-11 10:49 AM Response to Reply #15 |
19. Check this out, you won't believe it: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
happyslug (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-14-11 12:06 AM Response to Original message |
18. Duplicate Subject different post same subject |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GeorgeGist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-14-11 11:10 AM Response to Original message |
20. "Modern" Fourth Amendment jurisprudence? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Oct 17th 2024, 10:20 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC