One way to re-take the House of Representatives in 2012 is to donate to the DCCC.

[LoZoccolo]

[Name removed]

1. Deleted message

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

[AndyTiedye]

2. Got Tardis?

Gonna need one to affect the 2010 election now.

[Warren DeMontague]

7. Is that what Rahm was talking about?

The "Senate Liberals' fucking Tardis"?

[AndyTiedye]

9. The OP Originally Said 2010. It has been edited.

[Warren DeMontague]

11. I know.

I was trying to make a joke. :shrug:

[leftstreet]

3. Are they having an iPad drawing?

:shrug:

[Hippo_Tron]

4. In the aggregate yes, but you have a better chance of being struck by lightning twice

Than your individual contribution to the DCCC making or breaking the Democrats taking back the House in 2012 even if you donate the maximum.

Now if you can bundle a million dollars or so, the odds improve a tad bit that you could make the difference.

[msongs]

5. yes but your are better off donating to a local progessive/liberal than conservadems nt

[Zorra]

6. I think I'll just donate to Exxon directly and cut out the middle man. nt

[Jakes Progress]

8. I paid already at the pump.

[mod mom]

10. NEVER! I prefer to pick & choose the PROGRESSIVES worthy of my $.

Their association with DLC types are against what I stand for. example: Carville et al endorsed a weak, uncharismatic party man in the PRIMARY over progressive (former judge/SOS) Jennifer Brunner. They did damage by directing the $ they received to a weak candidate who couldn't even draw 40% in the general election against a Bush appointee with little name recognition.

[XemaSab]

12. They've never given a dime to any candidates in our area

Not one dime.

[yurbud]

13. I don't want one penny of my money going to a blue dog piece of shit who will vote with republicans

Most of the time.

[yurbud]

14. if you don't have time to pick progressive candidates, give to progessive groups that do