Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Who do you think will end up getting nominated for the Republican ticket?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
LiberalLoner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-17-11 09:04 AM
Original message
Who do you think will end up getting nominated for the Republican ticket?
Edited on Tue May-17-11 09:38 AM by LiberalLoner
I'm thinking Mitt Romney is going to the last man standing. I think he is raising funds very quickly and most Republicans have heard of him, and there's a lot of power in familiarity.

I don't think Palin will run, and Huckabee and Trump have already said "no" to a presidential bid.

Who do you think will end up running against President Obama?

Edited to add: I'm sorry if this was a dumb post/question, I just really am wondering at this point. And it matters to me because the more time we have to know who it will be, the more time we D's will have to do research on the candidate and develop a strategy to win against that candidate. I'm actually kind of worried about someone coming out of the blue like Palin did and being popular for a month and getting elected and then...I think our nation would never recover.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
HopeHoops Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-17-11 09:05 AM
Response to Original message
1. I'm not sure, but I do know that a road-killed skunk has a better chance than any of those assholes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalLoner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-17-11 09:08 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. LOL! Well, the "field is looking weak" as the pundits say. I'm just finding this
an interesting political season. I think it's unusual that there isn't already a very clear, and strongly supported, front runner in this race for the R nomination.

I wonder if it is because of what the pundits have described as Republicans eating their own.

The purity test is so strict at this point, Reagan would never have been elected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HopeHoops Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-17-11 09:13 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. I don't think any Republican with a REAL political future wants to lose it by getting trounced.
The bullshit they are pulling with the budget and their sheep-like obedience to the teabaggers are going to kill them in 2012.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Broderick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-17-11 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #8
22. And that I believe is the real story
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-17-11 09:32 AM
Response to Reply #1
14. Lunch
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ret5hd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-17-11 09:06 AM
Response to Original message
2. tricky rick perry
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalLoner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-17-11 09:10 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Wasn't he the guy who was talking about secession? I really think
talk of secession is unpatriotic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w8liftinglady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-17-11 09:13 AM
Response to Reply #2
9. OH,I hope!!! Will he have to resign as Texas Governor?!?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-17-11 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #9
23. Only if elected. I made that same joke 11 years ago. I quit laughing the next November.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheCowsCameHome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-17-11 09:07 AM
Response to Original message
3. It's like musical chairs over there.
Edited on Tue May-17-11 09:08 AM by TheCowsCameHome
I'd bet Mitt, because when the music stops he'll be the only one without a seat.

All the other fruitcakes will have fallen by the wayside.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yupster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-17-11 09:11 AM
Response to Original message
6. Dole, McCain, Romney
all bad candidates who won because people heard of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-17-11 09:12 AM
Response to Original message
7. I do not know enough about the personalities of the Republican Party to even guess
I am just not familiar with all of them, so I couldn't make a good guess as to who their Candidate will be. I am pretty sure of one thing though, its not anyone who is in the race right now.

There is something else I think about the next Republican Candidate. He, and it will certainly be a He, He only needs to get a few more votes than John McCain did last time to beat President Obama next time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Myrina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-17-11 09:14 AM
Response to Original message
10. Agree - he seems to be the least noxious ...
publicity-wise, anyway ... not a bottom feeder like Palin or Trump, and not shouting from the rooftops like Newt ...


:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aerows Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-17-11 09:14 AM
Response to Original message
11. They certainly don't have anyone decent
I would have guessed Trump had a chance before he went off the deep-end with the birther nonsense. Gingrich is poisonous. Romney is problematic because he supported the Massachusetts version of HCR.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-17-11 09:16 AM
Response to Original message
12. Romney, possibly Pawlenty,
Which means the 'Pugs will lose the Tea Party vote.

Neither candidate can win, and thus the election will be Obama's to lose. The only reason Obama loses will be because he pisses off the left so much that they stay home in droves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalLoner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-17-11 09:34 AM
Response to Reply #12
16. That's what worries me - I don't think the tea party vote will be lost because I think
they will all hold their noses and vote in lock-step for the right-wing candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nevergiveup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-17-11 09:18 AM
Response to Original message
13. It is Romney's turn.
This is the way the Republicans operate. Romney will be the candidate and he will cause Obama problems in states like Ohio, Pennsylvania and Indiana. Obama squeaks by but it will be closer than 2008.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-17-11 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #13
27. Romney has some unique weaknesses that may break the usual pattern.
Normally Republicans do nominate their senior candidate. The only times they didn't in the last 50 years were in 1964 and 2000. But Romney is seen as two faced by professionals and a closet liberal by activists. (But don't believe any of the anti-Mormon crap you read on DU--only idiots think that will matter). If he gets nominated by the sheer sexiness of his smile slapped on top of a tv campaign, he won't be able to staff up a decent campaign team in the summer and fall of 2012. It'll be a bigger train wreck than McCain's campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oldlib Donating Member (549 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-17-11 09:34 AM
Response to Original message
15. Michal Steele
The former head of the RNC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spartan61 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-17-11 09:35 AM
Response to Original message
17. Wendell Willkie n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
latinaliberal Donating Member (50 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-17-11 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
18. Republican ticket
What about this Huntsman guy? he appears to be a moderate repug.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FSogol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-17-11 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
19. Bob McDonnell. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenArrow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-17-11 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
20. Mitch Daniels.
Huckabee as veep candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-17-11 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. I agree except I think the VP will be Pawlenty
:shrug: Republicans will vote for them in a heartbeat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalLoner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-17-11 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #21
28. Exactly. We have to remember that the way they see it,
our President is the worst thing to ever happen to America. They genuinely believe that. A lot of it is that they are getting their information only from FOX news and some other sources like that. Another part of it is just that they are fiercely loyal to their team. I mean even if Gingrich cheated on his sick wife and served her divorce papers when she was dying of cancer in the hospital, they will still vote for him. Because at least he isn't President Obama. And they will find a way to explain away Gingrich's behavior.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-17-11 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #21
29. Then 2016 will be a Pawlenty vs Huckabee race
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChoppinBroccoli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-17-11 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
24. It'll Be Mitt Romney In A Remake Of The Movie "Election '96" Playing The Role Of Bob Dole
He'll get beaten every bit as badly as Dole (the "we have nobody, so here's a sacrificial lamb" candidate of THAT time) did in '96.

If the Republican Party were smart, they'd spend this time grooming the "new face" of their Party to get ready for 2016. The guy or gal who will move the Party AWAY from the wackos and nut-jobs that scare the pants off of the 60% of America that resides in the middle of the political spectrum, and more toward a candidate they can identify with. However, since they've spent the last 10 years doing nothing but kow-towing to the maniac fringe 10% on the far right, they don't have anyone like that right now. So, as I said, if they were smart, they would offer up some sacrificial lamb in 2012, and use the extra time getting SOMEBODY ready to make a SERIOUS run in 2016. Then again, if grandma had balls, she'd be grandpa, so I don't expect to see anything other than the same tired, old, retreads spouting the same tired, old rhetoric. And if they don't find someone to take them in a new direction, I expect that they'll get a whoopin' in 2016 as well (and I'm hoping it's at the hands of MY Senator and my current favorite politician on the Hill, Sherrod Brown).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-17-11 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
25. The Scramble Is On For The "Great White Hope"...


Right now of a field of very weak "contenders", Mittens has the best organization and money and those are the elements that win primaries and elections. But his support is an inch thick. Thus the scramble is on. Rachel and Larry did excelent reports last night on the scisms within the GOTB and the major flaws in each of the percieved candidates. In specific the split between the teabaggers and the party elite. There are few candidates that breach that scism and I think its inevitable that you'll either see some type of third party candidate (Ron or Rand Paul fit that bill) vs whomever the elite can sucker convince to run. Right now you're hearing about Daniels (a former booooosh insider) but he'd make Michael Dukakis look animated.

The scary thing is I see the chance for a Grifterella to jump in...but I use the term scary as in watching a good horror movie. With Trump and Hucklenutz dropping out, there's a lot of opportunities to scoop up enough of the great unhinged support to turn next year's convention into a real circus. She could be their "Hillary '08" with just enough primary votes to prevent any front runner from a clear path to the nomination. Now who is that other candidate? As said earlier, it looks like Mittens but I'm sure in those beltway boardrooms at American Crossroads there's someone being "groomed" to hop in at or near the last minute. They won't need to raise funds and will have the Rove machine ready to do its thing. But will the ccurrent rushpublican electorate buy it? Stay tuned...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-17-11 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
26. Along the lines of McCain and Dole
Someone near the end of his career who doesn't mind getting clobbered in the general. McCain came limping out of the field in 2008 (Remember how he got in, got out, and got back in? It was the Hokey Pokey Presidential Candidacy) to play the "happy" warrior. Dole was pushed forward in 1996 to grump and sneer his way through an interminable four months of the general campaign. GOP prospects for 2012 are near zero, but they feel like they have to run somebody without hurting every other race across the country. Mitch Daniels strikes me as a likely seat-warmer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 06:49 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC