|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
usregimechange (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-04-11 03:00 PM Original message |
So why is it ok for Scalia to publically comment on a topic that is currently before the court? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SpiralHawk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-04-11 03:02 PM Response to Original message |
1. Republicons are 'special' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jackpine Radical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-04-11 03:03 PM Response to Original message |
2. Whaddya gonna do? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pacalo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-04-11 03:15 PM Response to Reply #2 |
7. "They have nowhere else to go" is the new best friend of "Whaddya gonna do?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jackpine Radical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-04-11 03:18 PM Response to Reply #7 |
9. I guess you have to work at the points in the system |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kablooie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-05-11 12:27 PM Response to Reply #2 |
36. If he wasn't one of the Mafia himself we could hire a hit man. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Uncle Joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-04-11 03:05 PM Response to Original message |
3. Because he has no ethical sense of justice. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
usregimechange (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-04-11 03:06 PM Response to Original message |
4. "...nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
emulatorloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-04-11 03:06 PM Response to Original message |
5. He's above the law. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
enough (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-04-11 03:17 PM Response to Reply #5 |
8. Yes, and he gets off on flaunting that fact. He likes us to know there's nothing we can (or will) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BrklynLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-04-11 03:08 PM Response to Original message |
6. as usual..IOKIYAR |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truebrit71 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-04-11 03:22 PM Response to Original message |
10. It isn't and is yet another reason why this ignoramus needs to be impeached.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Laelth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-04-11 03:23 PM Response to Original message |
11. It's not OK. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blondeatlast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-04-11 03:24 PM Response to Original message |
12. Good catch. To my knowledge, he can't; but when has that ever stopped |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hardluck (11 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-04-11 03:58 PM Response to Original message |
13. Because it is not at issue |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-04-11 04:14 PM Response to Reply #13 |
15. Bzzzzt! Wrong! The answer is: because Fat Tony is nothing more than a CORRUPT THUG with a law degree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hardluck (11 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-04-11 05:06 PM Response to Reply #15 |
19. That may be but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
usregimechange (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-04-11 05:03 PM Response to Reply #13 |
18. Thanks but you confirmed my point, a case with major implications on the issue is before the court |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
former9thward (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-04-11 06:00 PM Response to Reply #18 |
21. No that is not before the court. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
usregimechange (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-05-11 02:56 AM Response to Reply #21 |
27. The fact that they have no current case relating to this issue directly indicates to me that... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
former9thward (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-05-11 11:56 AM Response to Reply #27 |
31. Almost all legal issues have a potential to come before the court. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Angry Dragon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-04-11 05:27 PM Response to Reply #13 |
20. Such as the citizens united case |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
unblock (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-04-11 03:58 PM Response to Original message |
14. the only enforcement to prevent this is impeachment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-04-11 04:30 PM Response to Original message |
16. The Wal-Mart class action is not a 14th Amendment suit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Art_from_Ark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-05-11 03:10 AM Response to Reply #16 |
28. Scalia's only understanding of the 14th Amendment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughBeaumont (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-04-11 04:44 PM Response to Original message |
17. "Vaffanculo", says the corpulent robed Cosa Nostra Don. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dkofos (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-04-11 06:08 PM Response to Original message |
22. He doesnt understand the Constitution, do you think he would understand ethics?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dkofos (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-04-11 06:11 PM Response to Original message |
23. He doesnt understand the Constitution, do you think he would understand ethics?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Recovered Repug (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-04-11 06:20 PM Response to Original message |
24. The Wal-Mart case is whether the female employees |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fascisthunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-04-11 06:28 PM Response to Original message |
25. It's Not Ok... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GeorgeGist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-04-11 08:53 PM Response to Original message |
26. Because he's a corporate whore. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-05-11 03:11 AM Response to Original message |
29. Because he's a dick. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tavalon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-05-11 07:32 AM Response to Original message |
30. Because he's above the law |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Unvanguard (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-05-11 12:04 PM Response to Original message |
32. The two issues are separate. The case you mention concerns statutes, not the Fourteenth Amendment. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wednesdays (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-05-11 12:06 PM Response to Original message |
33. IOKIYAR! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spanone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-05-11 12:07 PM Response to Original message |
34. because he's not challenged on it....is no one in politics concerned about this? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kablooie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-05-11 12:26 PM Response to Original message |
35. He's SCOTUS so immune from the legal limitations other judges submit to. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Oct 17th 2024, 10:07 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC