Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

GOP Proposal Would Repeal Drunk Driving Laws

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
ThisThreadIsSatire Donating Member (697 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-11 08:31 PM
Original message
GOP Proposal Would Repeal Drunk Driving Laws
Satire from http://thedesperateblogger.com/2011/05/gop-proposal-would-repeal-drunk-driving-laws/

Claiming the mantle of 'The Party of Personal Responsibility' and in an effort to correct what they characterize as 'senseless government intrusion into every day life', House Republicans today voted to open debate on a measure that would repeal all current drunk driving statutes.

The measure, introduced by freshman Rep. Jackson Daniels (R-TN) and titled "Repeal of the Intrusive Job and Buzz Killing Laws Act of 2011" immediately drew fire from House Democrats, several of whom offered to buy the first round for any Senator who votes to block the measure in that chamber – as passage in the Republican-controlled House of Representatives is virtually assured.

House Speaker John Boehner praised Rep. Daniels while expressing his support for the bill:

"Not only do these laws represent the sort of senseless overregulation long espoused by my colleagues on the other side of the aisle insofar as they impose government mandates on personal behavior, but as with all other forms of regulation, they result in needless expenditure of public funds and more importantly, they cost jobs. What my good friend Jack has done in drafting this historic piece of legislation is bring us a step closer to returning our country to a better time and place – a time where citizens have ownership over their own conduct without some bureaucracy dictating their personal behavior."


When asked how the legislation, when enacted, would lead to job creation, The Bronze Clod explained, "Repeal of these laws will lead to job creation not only in the beverage industry, but also in the hospitality industry. Greater alcohol consumption has been historically proven to create jobs in factories, bars, restaurants, and hotels. This doesn't even take into account other areas ancillary to the production and consumption of alcohol."

Majority Leader Eric Cantor elaborated even further on the job creation aspects of the measure:

"Between 1982 – when many of the tough drunk driving standards were first implemented – and 2008, fatalities related to drinking and driving in the US dropped by nearly one half. That figure represents approximately 25,000 cars per year that do not need to be repaired or replaced as well as approximately 14,000 jobs of those killed that would otherwise become available. That's not even counting the police, EMT, and hospital employees that would otherwise be needed, not to mention those who manufacture medical supplies, undertakers, cemeteries, and their employees, tow truck operators – the list goes on and on."


GOP financial guru, Wisconsin Rep. Paul Ryan, while briefing reporters on the budget implications inherent in the proposed legislation, also announced plans to introduce an amendment to the bill which would provide tax incentives for servers of alcohol to locate their businesses in between schools, houses of worship, and senior communities and the nearest stop sign or traffic light.

"According to statistics compiled by my staff and submitted to the Congressional Budget Office, if only 10% of our country's bars offering daily two-for-one specials had a school, church, or senior residence located where departing patrons are just picking up speed, the first year alone would result in savings that would keep the current Medicare system solvent for an additional eight years as well as savings of between 10 and $15 billion per year in education costs. This doesn't include the billions of dollars in savings gleaned from funds currently dedicated to investigating, prosecuting, and incarcerating people of legal age for not only exercising their Constitutional right to consume alcohol, but also for aiding in our economic recovery at the same time."


Ryan and Cantor also joined with Speaker Boehner in praising Rep. Daniels for drafting what they described as "a visionary, no-nonsense, common sense piece of legislation," with Cantor adding, "The people spoke last November. They put the Republican Party in charge of the House of Representatives because they know that it is we who are the party of personal responsibility, except of course when it comes to marital fidelity or government spending under a Republican President. Among those they voted into office was a man from Tennessee with a very bright future, Rep. Jackson Daniels. I stand here today firm in my confidence that by November 2012, the American people are going to decide that they want a whole lot more Jack Daniels."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-11 08:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. This is SUPPOSED to be satire, but they've actually done this...
Montana Republican Says Drunkenness is “Way of Life”; Opposes DUI Laws

Alan Hale thinks being drunk is a way of life. TEA party legislator yesterday made an impassioned speech on the floor of the Montana statehouse for the elimination of all DUI laws. Intelligent Discontent has the story and the must watch video.

Alan Hale, a frosh legislator from Basin, MT, says that “taverns and bars connect people together” and are “the centers of our communities”. To get to them, says Hale, “you must drive,” and thus DUI laws “are destroying a way of life” and should be eliminated.

Of course, Hale should know: he’s a bar owner, so I guess he’s doing a little self-dealing in his new job as legislator.

Generally, Republicans have had a long and difficult romance with alcohol in Montana– what with the heavy-drinking Congressman and his many drinking escapades, the Secretary of State who ran for office from rehab in 2010, the last governor’s chief-of-staff who drove drunk and killed the speaker of the House, and numerous GOP legislators who have recently been busted for drinking and driving and drinking and boating.

More:
http://mtcowgirl.com/2011/03/29/montana-republican-says-getting-drunk-is-a-way-of-life-opposes-dui-laws/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-11 08:38 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. My congressman tried to cover up his own DUI
Yes, he's a republican.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sonoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-11 09:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. Hilarious (or not)
These people are fuckin' nutz.

Sonoman
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sasha031 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-11 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
3. I'm trying to figure out if this is satire
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-11 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. I find Poe's law applies to a great many things these days..
Poe's law, named after its author Nathan Poe, is an Internet adage reflecting the fact that without a clear indication of the author's intent, it is difficult or impossible to tell the difference between sincere extremism and the satirical parody of extremism
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bubba Kush Donating Member (98 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-11 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. Me too.
GOP, at least in Wisconsin, would probably go that far. They're trying to pass laws that benefits no-one except themselves and their corporate masters. And for what?

Greed? Money? Money is finite. Someday it will just be eliminated from life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sonoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-11 08:41 PM
Response to Original message
4. Spot-on satire! My rec brought this thread to '0'.
Wouldn't it be ironic/hilarious if whoever un-recced this got nailed by a drunk driver tonight?

When you take the AssHole Party's arguments and plug in other topics, it can get pretty funny.

We have a little game going on, here in Sonoma. When we are all together and simply rockin', we all leave at the same time. There are usually only two Sheriff's cars out at night and they cannot possibly fuck with all of us at once. We have set up an account to help defray anyone's court costs.

Over the last two years, we have had to back exactly one case and not a single one of us has been involved in an accident (although I did manage to run my sidecar into the garage-door rail).

Sonoman
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThisThreadIsSatire Donating Member (697 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-11 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. I'm used to that on DU --
I've had pieces w/multiple 'unrecs' within 15 seconds of posting them...

I'm quite comfortable being 'unrec'd' by anyone who actually takes the time to read a piece -- but those who do it automatically because they take offense at the topic, or idea -- or just get their 'jollies' trashing others are the reason too many view us at DU as a 'fringe' site...

Thanks to all here who actually take the time to read my work -- whether you like it or hate it (and express your opinion)...

And special thanks to Ian David -- I knew it was getting really hard to satirize some of these clowns -- but I didn't realize it's become that nearly impossible!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krispos42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-11 08:49 PM
Response to Original message
6. It took until the 5th paragraph before I realized it was satire.
It would not surprise me in the slightest if this was true. And I see by Ian David's post that it kinda is!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-11 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Well... ''Repeal of the Intrusive Job and Buzz Killing Laws Act of 2011''?
There's your complicit wink.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krispos42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-11 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. No no no no no, that's exactly the kind of title I would expect!
"The Bronze Clod" is what gave it away. :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThisThreadIsSatire Donating Member (697 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-11 09:01 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Thanks, but as opposed to the first line reading:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krispos42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-11 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. Posted by member "ThisThreadIsSatire"?
:D


Nope, too obvious! :rofl:


I didn't notice who the OP was, and I jumped right to the excerpt box when the page loaded and just read from there, so I didn't even notice the first line in your post.

:dunce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThisThreadIsSatire Donating Member (697 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-11 09:31 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Thanks for the response -- and Help...
I was wondering why so many people here get really pissed at me thinking what I post is "real" when I do this...

Mybe this has something to do with it...

... with the exception, of course, of certain people who really are just assholes... :tinfoilhat:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-11 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
13. Rep.Jackson Daniels (R-TN)..come on people...
i mean look---ThisThreadIsSatire----


as usual...a well done bit of satire...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
juajen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-11 10:08 PM
Response to Original message
16. You got me. I did not read the first line. I only sometimes check
to see who posted, as I am more interested in content than author. I was admittedly appalled and finally laughing. It was really good and very funny. Horrible that I wasn't really surprised that they would do something like this if they thought they could get away with it. Some of their deregulation has hurt just as many people as drunk driving. They are not so dumb that they don't know what they are doing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThisThreadIsSatire Donating Member (697 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-11 10:15 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. True...
They criticize the President for "ignoring the recommendations of his own bi-partisan commission", when it comes to cutting spending (something they didn't care about with a Republican in the White House) but at the same time, they say that tax hikes -- also part of the commission's recommendations -- are 'off the table'.

Any party of absolutes is bound to be absolutely wrong... Until the 'GOP' (Grumpy Old Protestants) realize that that there actullay is such a thing as a good tax and a good regulation, the country is screwed...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-11 10:16 PM
Response to Original message
18. That should make mothers MADD
and everybody else too!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC