Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Gingrich wife worked for committee heavily lobbied by Tiffany

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-11 07:36 AM
Original message
Gingrich wife worked for committee heavily lobbied by Tiffany
Gingrich wife worked for committee heavily lobbied by Tiffany

At the same time Tiffany & Co. was extending Callista (Bisek) Gingrich a virtual interest-free loan of tens of thousands of dollars, the diamond and silverware firm was spending big bucks to influence mining policy in Congress and in agencies over which the House Agriculture Committee--where she worked--had jurisdiction, official records show.

Filings by Tiffany’s lobbyist, Cassidy & Co., and other government records show that the firm’s spending on “mining law and mine permitting-related issues” in Congress, as well as the Forest Service, the Interior Department, and Interior’s Bureau of Land Management shot up sharply between during the period when Callista Gingrich was chief clerk at the House Agriculture Committee.

Tiffany's annual lobbying expenditures rose from about $100,000 to $360,000 between 2005 and 2009, according to records assembled by the Center for Responsive Politics, a nonpartisan government watchdog organization.

The Forest Service, which comes under the committee’s jurisdiction, oversees mining, including silver mining, in federal forests.

.....................

MORE:
http://spytalkblog.blogspot.com/2011/05/gingrich-wife-worked-for-committee.html
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:J29P_Nnu_YAJ:soprweb.senate.gov/index.cfm%3Fevent%3DgetFilingDetails%26filingID%3D6E3E110C-0D15-47C8-AC440CC2ED1375FD+tiffany+%26+co+lobbyist&cd=2&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us&source=www.google.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
hobbit709 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-11 07:38 AM
Response to Original message
1. IOKIYAR
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-11 07:40 AM
Response to Original message
2. Just goes to show, never trust your 4th Republicon wife.
I think that's a Bublical proverb or something
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hobbit709 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-11 07:41 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Actually she's number 3
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-11 07:41 AM
Response to Original message
4. TPM covered this a couple days ago:
http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2011/05/gingriches_rang_up_big_tiffany_co_bill_while_jeweler_was_lobbying_her_house_committee.php

Not sure of your links & always attempt to find sources I know I can trust like TPM so I thought I's share it again :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-11 07:46 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. The link doesn't work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-11 09:57 AM
Response to Reply #5
10. I'll try again...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJCher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-11 07:52 AM
Response to Original message
6. On "Meet the Press," Gingrich was Evasive
While he stated that he had a revolving account with Tiffanys, he admitted it was interest-free and it was for half a million.

When Schieffer pressed him on it, he repeatedly said, "Go talk to Tiffanys." I thought that answer evasive and stupid. Why should Schieffer ask Tiffanys what his loan was for? Why would they answer that question?

How could an experienced politician NOT have an answer prepared for a situation this revealing?


Cher
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phentex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-11 07:55 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. because he's an ass? because he's slime? because he's an idiot?...
because avoiding the question and the issues IS WHAT HE DOES?

I need him to go away very soon!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-11 08:25 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Yes. And if he hadn't used the account as an example of his fiscal responsbility
It probably never would have been revealed!

:headbang:
rocktivity
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kingofalldems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-11 08:41 AM
Response to Original message
9. Special Prosecutor needed pronto
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-11 10:06 AM
Response to Original message
11. Classic Case Of Drip! Drip! Drip!
From what I've read there's nothing illegal involved here...the reason people found out was Gnewt put it on his financial dislosure form. It was right out there for the plucking...and that's where I'm amused at how inept the Gnewmeister has been in mismanaging this.

Had he admitted he ran up the tab, paraded the latest Mrs. Stepford Gingrich wearing the tiara and broach...we would have laughed for a day and then moved on to his next bafoonery. Instead, questions hang out there and the longer they do, the more questions get asked. And those questions start to go into the quid pro quo and his own fiscal accountability.

Political croninism and neopotism...you bet...but its outright common inside the beltway. Its more a peek at the workings of the corporate welfare system...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC