Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Telling moment for U.S.:After 10 years only 8 senators voted AGAINST the renewal of the Patriot Act

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-11 05:24 PM
Original message
Telling moment for U.S.:After 10 years only 8 senators voted AGAINST the renewal of the Patriot Act
LINK:Patriot Act Extension Passes Senate, Rand Paul Amendments Fail

Here are the names of those Senators who voted against extending it:
Baucus (D-MT)
Begich (D-AK)
Heller (R-NV)
Merkley (D-OR)
Murkowski (R-AK)
Paul (R-KY)
Sanders (I-VT)
Tester (D-MT)

You're gonna grow old and die and the Patriot Act will still be watching over you. And so will the "Secret Patriot Act". And maybe you can say I'm full of shit and maybe you can say I'm wrong.

But the numbers and the votes don't lie. Democrat, Republican: It doesn't matter who you vote for, they're both playing for the same side on this one.

PB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
KG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-11 05:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. american party politics is kabuki theater.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-11 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. kr
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-11 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. Makes me sad- even Ron Wyden (who I link to, speaking about the "Secret" Patriot Act) chickened out.
And voted for the damned thing. I am used to much, much better from him.

PB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-11 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #12
18. Oh, I think I see some method in his madness:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-11 05:54 AM
Response to Reply #18
28. And yet...
As Kentuck points out, if the $690 Billion defense budget exists without question while we're hearing calls to cut social services and just about everything else....how much hope can ther be?

PB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MilesColtrane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-11 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
22. Why is it always kabuki theater?
Why isn't it Commedia dell'arte, or Burlesque, or Theater of the Absurd?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-11 10:22 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. coz in kabuki theater, men played the roles of both sexes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-11 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
54. That's exactly what it is.
I have lost what respect I had for the lot of them. This is clearly what is ruining our nation. I guess these politicians, including the president, see this as an opportunity to make 'personal' gains.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
provis99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-11 05:28 PM
Response to Original message
2. I'm through with Dick Durbin.
First the Gang of Six, and now this. And all the complaining about how corporations own Congress, while at the same time he takes their corporate pac money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-11 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
3. As I've said many times: Behind the scenes, there is only ONE 'party'
Edited on Thu May-26-11 06:18 PM by ixion
they call the shots, dictate policy, and profit.

And they will destroy this country if We, the People let them, and thus far, we have done just that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigwillq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-11 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Yup.
That's really the way it is. I agree with you. Good post. :thumbsup:


might want to change "is" to "if" in your last sentence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-11 06:20 PM
Response to Reply #7
20. yeah, saw that... changed
thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigwillq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-11 06:20 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. No prob
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-11 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #3
13. Seems that way, more and more each day. Good post n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Upton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-11 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #3
14. That's for sure..
and it's never been more obvious...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-11 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #3
23. I just don't know what the answer is to change the way things are.
Maybe contracts with the People on certain issues, a real contract to perform a certain way on a certain issue in order to get votes.

:shrug:

PB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tonybgood Donating Member (33 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-11 02:57 PM
Original message
Both parties - VOTE THEM OUT!!!
If this doesn't tell you that the Democratic and Republican parties are just different sides of the same coin, I don't know what will. There is only one solution; vote out BOTH PARTIES!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tonybgood Donating Member (33 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-11 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #3
49. Both parties - VOTE THEM OUT!!!
If this doesn't tell you that the Democratic and Republican parties are just different sides of the same coin, I don't know what will. There is only one solution; vote out BOTH PARTIES!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-11 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
4. Nobody wants to be on record voting against it JUST IN CASE
There's another big strike.

Bernie Sanders, of course, is pure common sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
russspeakeasy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-11 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #4
48. They would have all abstained if they could..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-11 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
6. fuck bush & fuck all the toadies that empowered him after 911 and in the run-up
Edited on Thu May-26-11 05:45 PM by Hannah Bell
to the iraq war.

now in the 8th year of ww3, hope you're all happy with your freedom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-11 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. All of them: the long and the short and the tall, every last one of them
:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-11 05:47 PM
Response to Original message
8. Not to worry. Our freedom loving president will veto it.
If he can tear himself away from prosecuting whistleblowers and his "necessary" wars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-11 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #8
33. In fact, he could not wait to get home to sign it. Literally.
Edited on Fri May-27-11 10:49 AM by kenny blankenship
He couldn't wait, so he signed it while still in Europe. He should have signed it while in Austria, birthplace of the term "police state", instead of France. He was so close.

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2011/05/26/national/w165822D43.DTL&tsp=1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Green Manalishi Donating Member (426 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-11 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #8
55. Not to mention busting medical marijuana dispensaries
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-11 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
10. They're using the raw transcripts to run the rest.
Turning the NSA on the American people is exactly what Frank Church warned us about, back in '76.

Thank you for the heads-up on the USA PATRIOT Act, Poll Blind. Spot-on analysis.

One name who would and should be on that list is Paul Wellstone (Real D-MN).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Logical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-11 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
11. This country fell for the scare tactics. We too easily let them tell us what we need. n-t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Newest Reality Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-11 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
15. The Patriot Act is
just another way to say, "Eventually, you are going to get tired of what we are getting away with and so, we want to be able to legally keep an eye on everything you do while having the system setup to take care of any person or group who proves a threat to corporatism and, our Lord and Savior, Profit!"

You can't wage a war on a word alone. When they do that, you know it is either preemptive in regards to expected results, or it has an eventual payoff for many profiteers. While coincidence is not proof, I find it very alarming that the Patriot Act exists, in an Orwellian way, alongside the politically powerful rise of corporatism amidst an unparalleled transfer of wealth while the masses are increasingly disenfranchised and exploited more brutally and obviously every day.

Yup. You will need a lot of special powers and legal muscle to manage the results of a neo-Fascist movement and criminal activity at the top.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-11 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. +1
PB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Obamanaut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-11 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
17. Democrat, Republican, Independent - they are only different when they
are lying for your vote.

Then, they become/are the same.

And we reelect them for a long and prosperous career, and they know we will, so they don't care.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-11 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
19. 92 traitors and some of the eight are probably holding out for more.
See ya at the barricades or worst comes to work in the internment camps.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jefferson23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-11 10:31 PM
Response to Original message
25. I wish they would change the name of it, at least be honest about that.
The Just in Case Act.

Just in case we get attacked, just in case we need to bug you, just in case we fuck up and need to detain you forever to hide that we fucked up
when we detained you the first time.

Change the God damn name already to reflect what it really is about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-11 10:59 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. For all the billions, funny how when the world's biggest dirty bomb goes off (Fukushima)...
...we get like 3 weeks of radiation monitoring- where we don't even get to find out what the radiation monitored was, just that it was "acceptable".

PB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-11 11:05 PM
Response to Original message
27. The national security state is hugely profitable.
No one wants to get on the wrong side of that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-11 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #27
29. It's a term I throw around and hear thrown around but this is a concrete example of JUST HOW...
...powerful its influence is. I can't think of any other reasonable explanation other than the sheer weight of the military/industrial complex, pressing down on this issue.

PB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-11 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #29
41. Agreed. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-11 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #27
30. So Neofascism will eventually triumph... because it brings home the bacon?
MMMmmMMMmm bacon, for a bold new future of Unity & Strength!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-11 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #30
40. What do ya mean, "eventually"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-11 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #40
42. I didn't want to imply it had nowhere to go from here, no more mountains to climb
Edited on Fri May-27-11 12:21 PM by kenny blankenship
no more vistas to boldly venture toward, no rights left to hollow out, no protections to void. I foresee it still has a bold, crispy future ahead and its beast days are yet to come!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-11 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
31. great... more abuse of Power
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Towlie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-11 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
32. Democrats are trying to beat the Republicans by BECOMING the Republicans, which is no defeat at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueIris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-11 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
34. Ouch. And props to Jeff Merkley for being one of the smart ones.
Senator Wyden, what's your excuse?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-11 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #34
35. I know- I was wondering the exact same thing. However, it turns out that Wyden may...
...have negotiated to vote for the extension in return for a Patriot Act hearing which includes an investigation into the "Secret Patriot Act" Wyden had been going on about for a few days. Mostly Wyden is spot-on with me. Not as much as DeFazio, but nobody's perfect. ;) Anyway, I think he was figuring that he wasn't going to sink the thing with another Nay so tried to squeeze some "progress" out of it.

I mean, this is all speculation and who knows what the hearing will actually wind up being (i.e. how probing it'll be) but...

PB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bighart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-11 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #35
38. But what about the provision in the secret part that nulifies any agreement
to holding hearings on the secret part? :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-11 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #38
43. LOL- and I'm laughing because if I wasn't I'd be crying.
I presume that there may not be such a provision in the "Secret Patriot Act" but it may force a showdown between the Administration and the committee where Obama/Holder/whomever may be forced to claim states secrets or executive privilege or some such stuff, and that may be politically damaging.

Again, though, I'm flying just as blind as everyone else...

PB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meow mix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-11 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
36. both my senators on there...
gj guys!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-11 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #36
44. Whether it's MT or AK, you have good reason to be proud. I wish it was both OR's as well.
:thumbsup:

PB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meow mix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-11 11:52 PM
Response to Reply #44
59. envious of OR's blueness from here..
so i wouldnt worry about it too much lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Rinaldo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-11 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
37. Very interesting assortment of No votes
If I had been told in advance that 8 Senators would oppose it, there is absolutely no way I would have come close to guessing this list. Of these only Sanders and Paul seem obvious to me, and maybe I could have guessed a couple more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-11 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
39. Once again, I pause to consider:
Bernie Sanders in 2012 for the Top Job in the nation.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-11 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #39
45. If he did, what do you think would be a realistically-attractive VP?
?

PB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Saxon Donating Member (31 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-11 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
46. The politicians hate us for our Freedoms.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emsimon33 Donating Member (904 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-11 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
47. Why isn't Franken on the list?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bighart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-11 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #47
50. Because he voted for the extension.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aerows Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-11 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
51. I can't stand Baucus
But he voted with his heart on this one. I can't believe that people in this country ignore the damage the "Patriot" Act does to our liberties.

Three cheers for everyone, Republican and Democratic alike, that stood up and said "NO".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annm4peace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-11 03:37 PM
Response to Original message
52. someone told me Franken voted against it
Dang it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GeorgeGist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-11 04:02 PM
Response to Original message
53. Home of the brave?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pmorlan1 Donating Member (763 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-11 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
56. Only 8?
Edited on Fri May-27-11 05:08 PM by pmorlan1
I thought there were 23 who voted against the extension. Where are you seeing just 8? The link you provided shows 23?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pmorlan1 Donating Member (763 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-11 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #56
58. 23 voted Nay
I found this information (don't know if it's accurate). It's pretty bad when the MSM does not provide the vote information. They give you the totals but never bother to link to the names of who voted yea or nay. Can anyone else find the raw voting information?

23 voted no. Thats a good start (seriously thats definitely up from before)
Here is who voted no:
Akaka (D-HI) Baucus (D-MT) Begich (D-AK) Bingaman (D-NM) Brown (D-OH) Cantwell (D-WA) Coons (D-DE) Durbin (D-IL) Franken (D-MN) Harkin (D-IA) Heller (R-NV) Lautenberg (D-NJ) Leahy (D-VT) Lee (R-UT) Merkley (D-OR) Murkowski (R-AK) Murray (D-WA) Paul (R-KY) Sanders (I-VT) Tester (D-MT) Udall (D-CO) Udall (D-NM) Wyden (D-OR)

http://www.reddit.com/r/politics/comments/hkzy7/no_link_to_results_just_happened_patriot_act_has/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
d_b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-11 05:10 PM
Response to Original message
57. props to begich
still an oil whore, but such is ak.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 10:00 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC