|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
Syrinx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-05-11 06:29 AM Original message |
Scalia should be impeached immediately |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tulsakatz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-05-11 06:32 AM Response to Original message |
1. it's incredible....... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Enthusiast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-05-11 08:59 AM Response to Reply #1 |
17. That is why we get |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dflprincess (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-05-11 09:35 PM Response to Reply #17 |
49. Per Scalia, the Constitution does not protect women's rights, but it does give corporations rights |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mojeoux (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-05-11 11:20 PM Response to Reply #49 |
58. The Corps have access, but today the S.C. closed it's doors to Wash. tourists. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-05-11 08:55 PM Response to Reply #1 |
43. It takes people like Scalia and Thomas to deliver fascism to America for the elites .... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tomp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-05-11 10:36 PM Response to Reply #1 |
53. al gore voted for the moron, as did many other democrats. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
notesdev (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-05-11 06:34 AM Response to Original message |
2. His reading is correct |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
upi402 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-05-11 06:48 AM Response to Reply #2 |
5. "All persons" and it precludes states from superceding the 14th Amendment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
notesdev (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-05-11 07:12 AM Response to Reply #5 |
7. No, I mean you're reading extra meaning into the amendment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
upi402 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-05-11 07:35 AM Response to Reply #7 |
10. The Joint Committee on Reconstruction |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-05-11 09:23 AM Response to Reply #10 |
18. So you don't think the 19th Amendment was necessary? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
molly77 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-05-11 10:56 PM Response to Reply #18 |
56. Fascists don't like women. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
glinda (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-06-11 01:12 AM Response to Reply #56 |
63. Neither do hard core Federalists. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-06-11 06:52 AM Response to Reply #56 |
72. Unless the woman is Margaret Thatcher... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dpibel (898 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-06-11 06:41 PM Response to Reply #18 |
75. Ever read the 14th Amendment? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlbertCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-06-11 02:07 AM Response to Reply #7 |
68. and the way that word is used today would be an alien usage |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cbdo2007 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-05-11 10:48 AM Response to Reply #2 |
22. Whoa - get your common sense outta here!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Wizard (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-05-11 11:22 AM Response to Reply #22 |
30. The Executive enforces the law |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WCGreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-05-11 02:17 PM Response to Reply #30 |
33. The court has no ability what so ever to enforce the law... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RandomThoughts (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-05-11 06:35 AM Response to Original message |
3. Sounds like a metaphor. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
malaise (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-05-11 06:41 AM Response to Original message |
4. He should not get away with this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sofa king (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-05-11 07:07 AM Response to Original message |
6. Gotta knock down that 14th to get at the 13th. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fasttense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-05-11 07:21 AM Response to Original message |
8. If you might have some political power or are rich, you are NEVER held accountable in America. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
asjr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-05-11 07:32 AM Response to Original message |
9. I think Scalia considers himself the Pope. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elocs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-05-11 08:01 AM Response to Original message |
11. From your lips to god's ears, or if wishes were horses, beggars would ride. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TBF (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-05-11 08:04 AM Response to Original message |
12. And he can take Thomas and Roberts with him when he goes. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PSzymeczek (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-05-11 08:56 PM Response to Reply #12 |
44. Chain them together, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cascadiance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-05-11 08:27 AM Response to Original message |
13. Maybe cut a deal with Issa and the Republicans... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughBeaumont (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-05-11 08:37 AM Response to Original message |
14. "Vaffanculo", says the balding corrupt pile of Bewsh-selecting excretion. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
travelingtypist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-05-11 08:55 AM Response to Original message |
15. Whatever Scalia has done, Thomas has done it, too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Enthusiast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-05-11 08:58 AM Response to Original message |
16. K&R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pacalo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-05-11 10:36 AM Response to Original message |
19. A Supreme Court Justice should NOT -- much less, flagrantly -- be in CAHOOTS with a political party. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-05-11 10:51 AM Response to Reply #19 |
25. Not long ago, it was considered highly inappropriate for a sitting Justice to make public statements |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pacalo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-05-11 11:19 AM Response to Reply #25 |
29. They just keep lowering the bar. I have to believe that all this spiraling downward will eventually |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-05-11 02:15 PM Response to Reply #25 |
32. Justice Douglas, a great progressive, was hardly a wallflower |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robcon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-05-11 10:38 AM Response to Original message |
20. He never said women have no rights. He says the constiturion is silent on that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-05-11 10:41 AM Response to Original message |
21. Actually, he made the same argument proponents of the Equal Rights Amendment made |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rhett o rick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-05-11 08:16 PM Response to Reply #21 |
41. So you think he is cool Freddie? nm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-06-11 08:33 AM Response to Reply #41 |
73. No. Do you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spanone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-05-11 10:49 AM Response to Original message |
23. when a supreme court justice is politically active, we are in serious trouble |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-05-11 02:19 PM Response to Reply #23 |
34. I'm curious what you think of William O Douglas |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-05-11 10:50 AM Response to Original message |
24. Disagreement on a matter of personal opinion does not constitute grounds for impeachment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Orsino (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-05-11 10:52 AM Response to Original message |
26. By what Congress? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Javaman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-05-11 11:03 AM Response to Original message |
27. This is what you get when you live in a proto-fascist nation. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nye Bevan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-05-11 11:08 AM Response to Original message |
28. If the Constitution already prohibited sex discrimination |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
indepat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-05-11 02:11 PM Response to Original message |
31. Actually Scalia fits right in as the quintessential model of a justice the RW wants |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
StarburstClock (583 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-05-11 03:18 PM Response to Original message |
35. This country has torture camps and war criminals still freely promoting themselves |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mushroom (309 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-05-11 03:46 PM Response to Original message |
36. Remember this ruling? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
happyslug (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-06-11 01:08 AM Response to Reply #36 |
62. Actual Case, Town of Castle Rock vs Gonzales |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FiveGoodMen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-05-11 04:42 PM Response to Original message |
37. He should have been impeached when he said that innocence is no reason to stay a death penalty |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
immoderate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-05-11 05:27 PM Response to Original message |
38. Nonsense! He gets paid for his opinions. You can't impeach him for having one. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bemildred (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-05-11 05:29 PM Response to Original message |
39. The felonious five ought all to have been impeached after selection 2000. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GoddessOfGuinness (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-06-11 12:42 AM Response to Reply #39 |
60. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-05-11 05:32 PM Response to Original message |
40. Scarface has ruled the country for 10 years after his hand in the 2000 coup. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HowHasItComeToThis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-06-11 01:38 AM Response to Reply #40 |
67. THESE REPUBS ARE LIKE A CANCER |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rhett o rick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-05-11 08:18 PM Response to Original message |
42. What country do you live in? Only Republicans empeach. nm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Drale (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-05-11 08:59 PM Response to Original message |
45. The Women Hating republicans control the house now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DeSwiss (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-05-11 09:01 PM Response to Original message |
46. In the meantime until we get the impeachment trial started..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Plucketeer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-06-11 02:56 AM Response to Reply #46 |
71. Lemmee get my pincushion! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JoePhilly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-05-11 09:02 PM Response to Original message |
47. Use his logic against the 2nd ammendment. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
badtoworse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-05-11 10:42 PM Response to Reply #47 |
54. That is not a good example. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JoePhilly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-06-11 06:08 PM Response to Reply #54 |
74. Actually, its a GREAT example. And yours REINFORCES mine!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madamesilverspurs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-05-11 09:05 PM Response to Original message |
48. Shouldn't we first |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The_Commonist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-05-11 09:38 PM Response to Original message |
50. You know, he's right! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Optimistic (139 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-05-11 10:08 PM Response to Original message |
51. All Republicans want |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
erebusman (96 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-05-11 10:08 PM Response to Original message |
52. if his bush vs gore performance didnt do it nothing willl (NT) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jerseyjack (369 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-05-11 10:49 PM Response to Original message |
55. Yes, his sorry ass should be impeached but it ain't gonna happen |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JDPriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-05-11 10:59 PM Response to Original message |
57. Just because women did not have the right to vote did not mean |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bertman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-05-11 11:43 PM Response to Original message |
59. AGREED. Rec. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-06-11 12:45 AM Response to Original message |
61. He is the very definition of ackety. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alp227 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-06-11 01:24 AM Response to Original message |
64. not to mention that he sorta compromises his impartiality by giving talks to congress members |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lord Magus (443 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-06-11 01:34 AM Response to Original message |
65. If women want to be "persons" they have to incorporate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HowHasItComeToThis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-06-11 01:37 AM Response to Original message |
66. WHERE THE HELL ARE OUR INDEPENDENT PROSECUTERS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
watajob (253 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-06-11 02:15 AM Response to Original message |
69. "Apparently Scalia doesn't consider women to be "persons." " |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Citizen Worker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-06-11 02:46 AM Response to Original message |
70. Don Antonin, will you please show us where in the Fourteenth Amendment it states that corporations |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Oct 17th 2024, 11:51 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC