|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
![]() |
Better Believe It
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 08:56 AM Original message |
PFC Bradley Manning, An American Patriot: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Robb
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 09:00 AM Response to Original message |
1. "I know what's best for foreign policy and national security and I'm going to act on that." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 09:08 AM Response to Reply #1 |
6. Working/spying for the enemy is not what Manning has done/is doing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SidDithers
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 09:27 AM Response to Reply #1 |
12. +1...nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SidDithers
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 09:30 AM Response to Reply #12 |
13. wrong spot |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TBF
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 09:02 AM Response to Original message |
2. I agree - tried to rec this fwiw. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
muffin1
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 09:03 AM Response to Original message |
3. K&R n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MineralMan
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 09:07 AM Response to Original message |
4. Since when does a PFC decide what classified documents |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 09:09 AM Response to Reply #4 |
7. When they are evidence of high crimes and misdemeanors? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 09:26 AM Response to Reply #7 |
11. So if your mailman thinks you are engaged in crime |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Luminous Animal
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 09:52 AM Response to Reply #11 |
20. You confuse the individuals' Constitutional right to privacy with exposing government secrecy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 10:17 AM Response to Reply #20 |
26. True, but what I was driving at is... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MineralMan
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 09:36 AM Response to Reply #7 |
16. And do you suppose that PFC Manning read all those documents |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jmowreader
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 07:40 PM Response to Reply #7 |
72. Since when does a PFC decide that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kctim
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 09:08 AM Response to Original message |
5. Fact vs. opinion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 09:10 AM Response to Reply #5 |
8. Lt. Calley thanks you in retrospect. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ignis
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 07:59 PM Response to Reply #8 |
73. ! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bragi
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 09:13 AM Response to Reply #5 |
9. Why do you oppose exposing lies? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kctim
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 09:45 AM Response to Reply #9 |
18. He intentionally violated the US and US law |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bragi
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 10:17 AM Response to Reply #18 |
25. That's pretty sad |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kctim
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 11:16 AM Response to Reply #25 |
33. What is truly sad |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bragi
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 11:39 AM Response to Reply #33 |
39. Oh yes, the old "yelling fire in a theatre" canard |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kctim
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 01:30 PM Response to Reply #39 |
52. It is not a canard |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bragi
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 01:34 PM Response to Reply #52 |
53. I think you're wrong |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kctim
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 02:11 PM Response to Reply #53 |
60. Well that settles it then |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Donald Ian Rankin
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 10:11 AM Response to Reply #9 |
24. Because lying is legal, and releasing state secrets is not. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NHHome
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 09:23 AM Response to Original message |
10. I am a USAF Vet. , and My son is a currently serving |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Better Believe It
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 09:41 AM Response to Reply #10 |
17. Do you also think that Daniel Elsberg should have been shot for treason? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sheepshank
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 12:29 PM Response to Reply #17 |
43. As far s I'm aware, that is not a legal standard for anything. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bragi
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 01:01 PM Response to Reply #43 |
50. Manning's leaks may save lives |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sheepshank
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 08:39 PM Response to Reply #50 |
63. may, if, possibly, could... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sheepshank
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 12:31 PM Response to Reply #10 |
44. +100 (if there was only a way to do this) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SidDithers
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 09:31 AM Response to Original message |
14. I got to unrec this post the first time you posted it, back on Dec 26... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JTFrog
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 11:28 AM Response to Reply #14 |
35. Sid +1, OP -1. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bobbie Jo
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 12:15 PM Response to Reply #14 |
42. LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 09:34 AM Response to Original message |
15. if he saw a crime and gather specific info. but what he did was punk theft. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hayu_lol
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 09:49 AM Response to Reply #15 |
19. He violated both the UCMJ ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Better Believe It
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 10:00 AM Response to Reply #19 |
22. So what? PFC Manning is a wonderful role model for young people who really care about this country |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bragi
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 10:20 AM Response to Reply #22 |
27. ++ Well said /nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Donald Ian Rankin
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 10:21 AM Response to Reply #22 |
28. Quite rightly, none of them are being sent to prison, because they're not breaking the law! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Better Believe It
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 11:43 AM Response to Reply #28 |
40. "the constitution is phrased far, far too vaguely to function as law" Since when? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Donald Ian Rankin
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 12:45 PM Response to Reply #40 |
48. The consitution is a framework for other laws, not law enforceable in its own right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Better Believe It
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 09:13 PM Response to Reply #48 |
66. The Constitution is and has always been the supreme law of the land. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 10:06 AM Response to Reply #19 |
23. i agree with you. my point. if he knew of a specific crime and became a whistleblower |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kgnu_fan
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 09:53 AM Response to Original message |
21. Some questions have been raised about authenticity of Lamo's chat log |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
treestar
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 10:23 AM Response to Original message |
29. If I were his defense lawyer, I wouldn't use that argument. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catherina
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 10:50 AM Response to Original message |
30. Rec'd. Free Manning now and put the war criminals in solitary. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VeryConfused
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 10:57 AM Response to Original message |
31. This article doesn't make any sense |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Better Believe It
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 11:11 AM Response to Original message |
32. "I am a US Air Force Intelligence Veteran of the War in Afghanistan and I support Wikileaks." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PBS Poll-435
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 11:18 AM Response to Reply #32 |
34. You should put your title in quotes or ellipses. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Better Believe It
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 11:32 AM Response to Reply #34 |
37. An oversight. Just did it. Thanks. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JTFrog
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 11:31 AM Response to Reply #32 |
36. No, I doubt you are. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tierra_y_Libertad
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 11:36 AM Response to Original message |
38. No! He's a really skeery guy who threatens Amurka with...knowledge. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Donald Ian Rankin
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 12:50 PM Response to Reply #38 |
49. He sure as hell threatens Zimbabwe. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tierra_y_Libertad
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 01:18 PM Response to Reply #49 |
51. From Manning or the contents of the cables? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SidDithers
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 01:37 PM Response to Reply #51 |
54. Does it make a difference?... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Donald Ian Rankin
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 01:40 PM Response to Reply #51 |
55. Both. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tierra_y_Libertad
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 01:48 PM Response to Reply #55 |
56. The question devolves into whether Tsvangirai broke Zimbabwe's laws, doesn't it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Donald Ian Rankin
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 01:58 PM Response to Reply #56 |
58. You might want to read up on the recent state of the rule of law in Zimbabwe. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tierra_y_Libertad
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 02:29 PM Response to Reply #58 |
62. Was Tsvangirai and the diplomats aware that he was breaking the law? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Donald Ian Rankin
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 09:43 PM Response to Reply #62 |
67. I think you're being somewhat disingenuous. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Luminous Animal
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 10:26 PM Response to Reply #62 |
69. Tsvangirai didn't break the law but he was being a shithead to his supporters. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Robb
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 07:46 AM Response to Reply #69 |
71. Sure. Mugabe's just like Boehner. Ask Patson Chipiro. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Better Believe It
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 01:54 PM Response to Reply #49 |
57. And who is threatening Afghanistan? Manning didn't send U.S. troops to Afghanistan . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Donald Ian Rankin
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 02:05 PM Response to Reply #57 |
59. Irrelevant for many reasons. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Better Believe It
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 02:23 PM Response to Reply #59 |
61. Don't tell me what my "argument boils down to". I'll tell you, if you don't mind. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Donald Ian Rankin
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 09:51 PM Response to Reply #61 |
68. Treason is a legal, not a moral, category. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Luminous Animal
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 10:26 PM Response to Reply #68 |
70. Manning hasn't been charged with treason. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Luminous Animal
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 08:48 PM Response to Reply #49 |
64. Chances are slim that it will happen. Mere political posturing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PBS Poll-435
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 12:11 PM Response to Original message |
41. Why did this thread not get the usual WikiHumping? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GSLevel9
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 12:36 PM Response to Original message |
45. or an American traitor... one or the other. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Donald Ian Rankin
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 12:38 PM Response to Reply #45 |
46. There's nothing contradictory about being both. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GSLevel9
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 12:39 PM Response to Reply #46 |
47. good point. I'll buy that. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Luminous Animal
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 08:52 PM Response to Original message |
65. Kick for Bradley Manning, patriot. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saras
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 08:36 PM Response to Original message |
74. Nuremberg principles |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 07:56 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC