|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
![]() |
onehandle
![]() |
Mon May-30-11 07:43 AM Original message |
3-D Starts to Fizzle, and Hollywood Frets |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hobbit709
![]() |
Mon May-30-11 07:44 AM Response to Original message |
1. Maybe they should spend less on special effects and a little more on a plot. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ret5hd
![]() |
Mon May-30-11 07:51 AM Response to Reply #1 |
2. i bet you are one of --those-- people... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hobbit709
![]() |
Mon May-30-11 07:58 AM Response to Reply #2 |
6. I learned to read books at the age of four. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jackpine Radical
![]() |
Mon May-30-11 08:31 AM Response to Reply #6 |
12. There is something wonderful about Fraktur. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
marmar
![]() |
Mon May-30-11 07:56 AM Response to Reply #1 |
4. Exactly. A crappy movie in 3-D is still a crappy movie. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spooked911
![]() |
Mon May-30-11 07:58 AM Response to Reply #1 |
5. exactly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
originalpckelly
![]() |
Mon May-30-11 08:21 AM Response to Reply #1 |
10. That and make the resolution of the movie higher. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occulus
![]() |
Mon May-30-11 12:50 PM Response to Reply #10 |
24. They're starting to film at 60 frames per second. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rurallib
![]() |
Mon May-30-11 07:55 AM Response to Original message |
3. the upcharge to see 3D is pretty healthy out here in the hinterlands |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberal N proud
![]() |
Mon May-30-11 08:06 AM Response to Original message |
7. Lets see $12 dollars and must wear uncomfortable glasses vs. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ready4Change
![]() |
Mon May-30-11 08:12 AM Response to Original message |
8. I've astigmatisms in boh eyes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tesha
![]() |
Mon May-30-11 08:48 AM Response to Reply #8 |
15. The trouble is that your brain has been trained through millions of years... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
formercia
![]() |
Mon May-30-11 05:20 PM Response to Reply #15 |
46. CBS Labs had a true holographic color movie projection in 1969 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Shagbark Hickory
![]() |
Mon May-30-11 08:13 AM Response to Original message |
9. I wish they'd develop a 3d windshield for your car. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill
![]() |
Tue May-31-11 11:23 AM Response to Reply #9 |
71. There's something really disturbing about that reply |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Shagbark Hickory
![]() |
Tue May-31-11 11:58 AM Response to Reply #71 |
75. It would be a safety feature. So people can see things flying through the window before it actually |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WolverineDG
![]() |
Mon May-30-11 08:29 AM Response to Original message |
11. I can't watch 3D movies |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shanti
![]() |
Mon May-30-11 06:57 PM Response to Reply #11 |
60. you're not alone |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WolverineDG
![]() |
Mon May-30-11 07:01 PM Response to Reply #60 |
61. I read a newspaper article about it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nye Bevan
![]() |
Mon May-30-11 08:37 AM Response to Original message |
13. 3D is only good for theme parks. I like Mickeys Philharmagic and the 3D muppets at Disney. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onehandle
![]() |
Mon May-30-11 12:16 PM Response to Reply #13 |
22. My wife and I did Mickey's Philharmagic a couple of months ago. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CBGLuthier
![]() |
Tue May-31-11 07:58 AM Response to Reply #13 |
70. 100% agreement |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Motown_Johnny
![]() |
Mon May-30-11 08:45 AM Response to Original message |
14. Because they make 3D Movies. They should just make movies that are in 3D. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tesha
![]() |
Mon May-30-11 08:55 AM Response to Original message |
16. Prediction: 3D will become standard. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
delunapark
![]() |
Mon May-30-11 09:26 AM Response to Reply #16 |
19. IMAX is better. IMO |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tesha
![]() |
Mon May-30-11 01:09 PM Response to Reply #19 |
29. IMAX 3D is better still! ;-) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
delunapark
![]() |
Mon May-30-11 01:35 PM Response to Reply #29 |
37. Cool |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Initech
![]() |
Mon May-30-11 08:59 AM Response to Original message |
17. I saw a 3-D documentary, and I came to the conclusion I really hate 3-D. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rucky
![]() |
Tue May-31-11 07:01 AM Response to Reply #17 |
69. Admit it. You saw the Justin Beiber movie. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ikri
![]() |
Mon May-30-11 09:23 AM Response to Original message |
18. How many films |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MorningGlow
![]() |
Mon May-30-11 09:28 AM Response to Original message |
20. A gimmick is a gimmick is a gimmick |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tesha
![]() |
Mon May-30-11 01:12 PM Response to Reply #20 |
30. Yeah, that "Color TV" stuff is for the birds (NBC Peacocks). |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MorningGlow
![]() |
Mon May-30-11 05:06 PM Response to Reply #30 |
43. Har har |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tesha
![]() |
Mon May-30-11 05:44 PM Response to Reply #43 |
49. 3D with the old red/blue system has very little to do with modern 3D. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MorningGlow
![]() |
Mon May-30-11 05:57 PM Response to Reply #49 |
51. Yabbut |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tesha
![]() |
Mon May-30-11 06:22 PM Response to Reply #51 |
57. There's actually very little extra cost to filming a movie stereoscopically... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill
![]() |
Mon May-30-11 06:52 PM Response to Reply #30 |
59. You can have my Betamax when you pry it from my cold, dead fingers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tesha
![]() |
Tue May-31-11 06:54 AM Response to Reply #59 |
68. Not *EVERY* idea is a good idea, of course. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Danmel
![]() |
Mon May-30-11 09:37 AM Response to Original message |
21. I get very queasy from 3-d |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal_in_LA
![]() |
Mon May-30-11 12:55 PM Response to Reply #21 |
27. I get queasy in IMAX movies, particularly the scenes where they swoop over terrain |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Danmel
![]() |
Mon May-30-11 01:12 PM Response to Reply #27 |
31. Me too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal_in_LA
![]() |
Mon May-30-11 01:18 PM Response to Reply #31 |
35. I've kept my eyes closed the whole time too. The only IMAX that didn't produce that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tesha
![]() |
Mon May-30-11 01:13 PM Response to Reply #27 |
32. That's because your inner ear is sending signals that are totally at variance... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal_in_LA
![]() |
Mon May-30-11 01:16 PM Response to Reply #32 |
34. Yes. I get seasick also. Can't read in moving vehicles. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tesha
![]() |
Mon May-30-11 05:45 PM Response to Reply #34 |
50. It's all the same phenomenon: your eyes disagreeing with your inner ears (NT) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fishwax
![]() |
Mon May-30-11 12:47 PM Response to Original message |
23. some filmmakers actually take advantage of 3d, but for others it's just a gimmick |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal_in_LA
![]() |
Mon May-30-11 12:53 PM Response to Original message |
25. I've only seen one 3-D, The Alice and wonderland one with Johny Depp |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JCMach1
![]() |
Mon May-30-11 01:42 PM Response to Reply #25 |
39. Wasn't even originally filmed in 3D... was added in post-production as a gimmick |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alexander
![]() |
Mon May-30-11 12:54 PM Response to Original message |
26. Good. Avatar sucked as a movie. This 3-D nonsense needs to end. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Supply Side Jesus
![]() |
Mon May-30-11 01:07 PM Response to Reply #26 |
28. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taverner
![]() |
Mon May-30-11 01:15 PM Response to Original message |
33. I think it's time to double down! Bring back Waters' 'Odorama'!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lucian
![]() |
Mon May-30-11 01:23 PM Response to Original message |
36. For the price of a ticket to see the 3D movie... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JCMach1
![]() |
Mon May-30-11 01:41 PM Response to Original message |
38. Sometimes it just ruins the picture... I think Cameron actually thought through 3D as a director |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occulus
![]() |
Mon May-30-11 01:48 PM Response to Reply #38 |
40. Those would probably be the ones where the 3D effect is added in post. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lizzie Poppet
![]() |
Mon May-30-11 01:52 PM Response to Reply #38 |
41. In addition, he not only planned for it, he used it interestingly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MurrayDelph
![]() |
Mon May-30-11 03:02 PM Response to Original message |
42. After seeing Pirates 4 in 3d |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onehandle
![]() |
Mon May-30-11 06:15 PM Response to Reply #42 |
55. Seeing Pirates 4 tomorrow. In 2D. Glad to have the choice. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
backscatter712
![]() |
Mon May-30-11 05:13 PM Response to Original message |
44. 3D as it currently stands is still nothing more than a gimmick. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CaliforniaPeggy
![]() |
Mon May-30-11 05:17 PM Response to Original message |
45. Roger Ebert called it a gimmick. That's good enough for me. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Downtown Hound
![]() |
Mon May-30-11 05:25 PM Response to Original message |
47. Hollywood needs to can its unrealistic profit expectations |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
svpadgham
![]() |
Mon May-30-11 05:35 PM Response to Original message |
48. Did anyone mention... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onehandle
![]() |
Mon May-30-11 06:15 PM Response to Reply #48 |
56. It really sucks. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WatsonT
![]() |
Mon May-30-11 06:01 PM Response to Original message |
52. I certainly hope so |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy
![]() |
Mon May-30-11 06:01 PM Response to Original message |
53. The best movies over the last few years have come out of Korea and aren't 3D. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zappaman
![]() |
Tue May-31-11 02:55 AM Response to Reply #53 |
64. Didn't care for THIRST |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lifesbeautifulmagic
![]() |
Mon May-30-11 06:02 PM Response to Original message |
54. if i have a choice between 3-D and 2-D, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mopar151
![]() |
Mon May-30-11 06:42 PM Response to Original message |
58. What of us who have monocular vision? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
localroger
![]() |
Mon May-30-11 07:10 PM Response to Reply #58 |
62. 3D halves the brightness |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kablooie
![]() |
Tue May-31-11 02:39 AM Response to Original message |
63. Good! I'm tired of paying extra for the privilege of getting a headache from the film. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BulletproofLandshark
![]() |
Tue May-31-11 03:00 AM Response to Original message |
65. I hope it dies out too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
csziggy
![]() |
Tue May-31-11 03:05 AM Response to Original message |
66. They need to have actual ghosts fly out of the screen! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Scottybeamer70
![]() |
Tue May-31-11 03:39 AM Response to Original message |
67. They'll never match the 3D movie from the 50's....... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TrogL
![]() |
Tue May-31-11 11:41 AM Response to Original message |
72. I'll go to 3D movies when they start doing it in real life |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RedCappedBandit
![]() |
Tue May-31-11 11:43 AM Response to Original message |
73. Ever take your glasses off in the middle of a 3d movie? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
charlie and algernon
![]() |
Tue May-31-11 12:00 PM Response to Reply #73 |
76. YES! I saw James Cameron's OTHER 3D movie, Sanctum |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AngryAmish
![]() |
Tue May-31-11 11:48 AM Response to Original message |
74. 3D hurts my eyes and gives me a headache |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LynneSin
![]() |
Tue May-31-11 12:10 PM Response to Original message |
77. I suppose the fact that neither movie had decent reviews doesn't play into this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 06:39 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC