|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
![]() |
Dr. Strange
![]() |
Tue May-31-11 11:04 AM Original message |
Naomi Campbell: Cadbury Ad 'Insulting & Hurtful' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EOTE
![]() |
Tue May-31-11 11:09 AM Response to Original message |
1. Racist? Seriously? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HipChick
![]() |
Tue May-31-11 11:12 AM Response to Reply #1 |
3. Would you liken a Mexican to a Burrito and think that's not offensive? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rocktivity
![]() |
Tue May-31-11 11:18 AM Response to Reply #3 |
9. The ad doesn't say there's a new burrito in town. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue-Jay
![]() |
Tue May-31-11 11:20 AM Response to Reply #3 |
11. Move over J-Lo, there's a new taco in town! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AngryAmish
![]() |
Tue May-31-11 11:46 AM Response to Reply #11 |
30. J-Lo would be hibarito. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EOTE
![]() |
Tue May-31-11 12:07 PM Response to Reply #3 |
40. No. Do you really think those two cases are anywhere near similar? NT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
malaise
![]() |
Tue May-31-11 11:51 AM Response to Reply #1 |
33. The ad is sickening |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EOTE
![]() |
Tue May-31-11 12:08 PM Response to Reply #33 |
42. Why? Because it calls a model who is obviously a diva... a diva? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HipChick
![]() |
Tue May-31-11 11:11 AM Response to Original message |
2. I think they should have sought her approval before using her name...however she's reaching here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Marr
![]() |
Tue May-31-11 11:12 AM Response to Original message |
4. I guess when you make millions for walking 20 feet and spinning around, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rocktivity
![]() |
Tue May-31-11 11:16 AM Response to Original message |
5. This ad equates Campbell to being a diva, not a piece of chocolate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FLAprogressive
![]() |
Tue May-31-11 11:18 AM Response to Reply #5 |
8. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hifiguy
![]() |
Tue May-31-11 11:21 AM Response to Reply #5 |
12. +2 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shanti
![]() |
Tue May-31-11 11:27 AM Response to Reply #5 |
16. no |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rocktivity
![]() |
Tue May-31-11 11:30 AM Response to Reply #16 |
19. She's offended because the ad works, and the ad works |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HipChick
![]() |
Tue May-31-11 11:33 AM Response to Reply #19 |
20. that Brits have a racism problem? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rocktivity
![]() |
Tue May-31-11 11:54 AM Response to Reply #20 |
36. You're right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dreamer Tatum
![]() |
Tue May-31-11 11:34 AM Response to Reply #16 |
21. wrong nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Tue May-31-11 11:38 AM Response to Reply #5 |
23. The equation to diva is explicit, the one to chocolate, implicit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HipChick
![]() |
Tue May-31-11 11:40 AM Response to Reply #23 |
25. but highly obvious for black people growing up in the UK..see post #15 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Tue May-31-11 11:41 AM Response to Reply #25 |
26. I'm agreeing with you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HipChick
![]() |
Tue May-31-11 11:47 AM Response to Reply #26 |
31. "Part of the problem is, that they don't see it as offensive.".. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Tue May-31-11 11:52 AM Response to Reply #31 |
34. If they substituted "Michelle" for "Naomi" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ecstatic
![]() |
Tue May-31-11 12:05 PM Response to Reply #5 |
39. That's subject to interpretation. I certainly didn't view it that way nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lucky Luciano
![]() |
Wed Jun-01-11 07:46 AM Response to Reply #5 |
47. Agreed, she is indeed a diva. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tularetom
![]() |
Tue May-31-11 11:16 AM Response to Original message |
6. Where the hell does it say "Campbell" in that ad? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Canuckistanian
![]() |
Tue May-31-11 11:18 AM Response to Original message |
7. She complains about being called a diva... by acting like a diva |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Goblinmonger
![]() |
Tue May-31-11 11:19 AM Response to Original message |
10. Someone needs to get over themselves. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blogslut
![]() |
Tue May-31-11 11:21 AM Response to Original message |
13. I'm thinking Ms. Campbell is deflecting from the (possible) intent of the ad |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blasphemer
![]() |
Tue May-31-11 11:24 AM Response to Original message |
14. Insulting perhaps but not racist |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HipChick
![]() |
Tue May-31-11 11:28 AM Response to Reply #14 |
18. racist in the UK...see post #15.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HipChick
![]() |
Tue May-31-11 11:26 AM Response to Original message |
15. for black people in the UK.., being likened to chocolate was as bad as being called a Golliwog.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
woodsprite
![]() |
Tue May-31-11 11:28 AM Response to Original message |
17. If I were Naomi, I think I would have felt more ticked about the Diamonds. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pitohui
![]() |
Tue May-31-11 11:42 AM Response to Reply #17 |
28. the one from charles taylor was a blood diamond |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KansDem
![]() |
Tue May-31-11 11:36 AM Response to Original message |
22. Who's Naomi Campbell? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dr. Strange
![]() |
Tue May-31-11 11:44 AM Response to Reply #22 |
29. Don't make Naomi angry. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KansDem
![]() |
Tue May-31-11 11:53 AM Response to Reply #29 |
35. Ah, yes...thanks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
meow mix
![]() |
Tue May-31-11 11:39 AM Response to Original message |
24. blood diamonds are hurtful |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
emilyg
![]() |
Tue May-31-11 02:13 PM Response to Reply #24 |
45. Yes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WolverineDG
![]() |
Tue May-31-11 11:41 AM Response to Original message |
27. Pretty much proving Cadbury's point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OmmmSweetOmmm
![]() |
Tue May-31-11 11:48 AM Response to Original message |
32. I think that the people who created the ad were definitely tasteless but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ecstatic
![]() |
Tue May-31-11 12:03 PM Response to Original message |
37. That IS outrageous. I can't believe some people |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warpy
![]() |
Tue May-31-11 12:04 PM Response to Original message |
38. Cadbury was unbelievably tacky for doing this one. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AuntPatsy
![]() |
Tue May-31-11 12:07 PM Response to Original message |
41. The ad is sickening enough, some of the replies on this thread in a supposed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EOTE
![]() |
Wed Jun-01-11 07:28 AM Response to Reply #41 |
46. Why? Because some here don't see racism in every little thing? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CBGLuthier
![]() |
Tue May-31-11 12:15 PM Response to Original message |
43. I think those three ladies working for Dove should eat more chocolate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
closeupready
![]() |
Tue May-31-11 12:18 PM Response to Original message |
44. I actually agree with Ms. Campbell and her mother, personally. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NYC Liberal
![]() |
Wed Jun-01-11 07:53 AM Response to Original message |
48. No. Not in the least. It says she's a diva. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueIris
![]() |
Wed Jun-01-11 07:57 AM Response to Original message |
49. That was my first thought, too, Ms. Morris: "It's not 1951, Cadbury." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hughee99
![]() |
Wed Jun-01-11 08:01 AM Response to Original message |
50. Sorry, don't see the racism here, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jorno67
![]() |
Wed Jun-01-11 08:02 AM Response to Original message |
51. It's only racist if you want it to be! I'm sure Naomi Judd or Naomi Watts don't have issues with it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 07:08 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC