|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
![]() |
RamboLiberal
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 05:54 PM Original message |
Elizabeth Edwards cut estranged husband John Edwards out of will week before she died |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
delightfulstar
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 05:57 PM Response to Original message |
1. Good, indeed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
backtomn
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 12:50 PM Response to Reply #1 |
156. I agree....smart plan. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
unc70
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 08:15 PM Response to Reply #1 |
174. Haters, remember family trip together to Japan last summer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fire1
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 05:58 PM Response to Original message |
2. As it should be! I don't think he expected anything else. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CountAllVotes
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 06:00 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. however what he deserved he did not get |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fire1
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 06:08 PM Response to Reply #4 |
5. That's another issue, entirely. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 06:56 PM Response to Reply #4 |
14. Deleted message |
LibDemAlways
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 07:26 PM Response to Reply #4 |
19. My late father would have enjoyed your comment. I agree. +1000 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CountAllVotes
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 08:05 PM Response to Reply #19 |
28. actually .... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gateley
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 05:59 PM Response to Original message |
3. I wonder if it's a community property state? The article says it was John's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raschel
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 06:13 PM Response to Reply #3 |
6. But mom is gone and it would not be a good thing for them to have a father in dire straits. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lindsey
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 06:29 PM Response to Reply #6 |
8. IMO he's the biggest BASTARD EVER. He's got 25 million so |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 06:42 PM Response to Reply #8 |
11. I don't think that was necessarily a statement. It probably made |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
former9thward
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 09:17 PM Response to Reply #11 |
46. No estate tax in 2010. They don't have to pay anything. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 09:50 PM Response to Reply #46 |
53. Whatever is the case for 2010 won't apply for when John Edwards |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
former9thward
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 10:10 PM Response to Reply #53 |
60. I guarantee you the estate of John Edwards will pay no tax. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 10:14 PM Response to Reply #60 |
63. Setting up trusts doesn't ensure that all your money will pass on to your heirs. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
former9thward
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 10:20 PM Response to Reply #63 |
65. Yes charitable trusts that are run by your children |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 10:28 PM Response to Reply #65 |
73. They still are required to donate money to charity. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boppers
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 03:28 AM Response to Reply #11 |
126. Wait, we're worried about millionaire rich kids on DU? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrMickeysMom
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 09:38 PM Response to Reply #8 |
50. "I want my money back!"... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jonthebru
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 09:51 PM Response to Reply #6 |
54. He'll do fine. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 06:36 PM Response to Reply #3 |
10. Most community property states are in the west, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pitohui
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 09:08 PM Response to Reply #10 |
41. louisiana is also a community property state |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 09:54 PM Response to Reply #41 |
55. Wealthy couples often don't include each other in their wills. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadLinguist
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 10:26 PM Response to Reply #55 |
69. Its almost certainly the case that they discussed it and agreed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 10:27 PM Response to Reply #69 |
72. I agree. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
marybourg
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 10:26 PM Response to Reply #41 |
71. In most states spouses who are cut out of a will get a certain |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lex
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 12:04 AM Response to Reply #71 |
95. I'm sure they at least had a Separation Agreement which |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 11:24 PM Response to Reply #41 |
81. They were divorced, weren't they? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Justitia
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 11:37 PM Response to Reply #81 |
84. no |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 02:20 AM Response to Reply #81 |
117. You are wrong on the facts. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 05:36 AM Response to Reply #117 |
132. I haven't followed the Edwards marital affair story, just |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
trud
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 11:34 PM Response to Reply #41 |
83. "it is outrageous that someone can write their own spouse out of the will" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 01:40 AM Response to Reply #83 |
111. In some states, you still cannot dishinherit a spouse entirely. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 01:40 AM Response to Reply #83 |
112. In some states, you still cannot dishinherit a spouse entirely. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 01:56 AM Response to Reply #41 |
113. Divorces can take a long time--and working on the divorce may not be your first priority if you are |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DeschutesRiver
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 11:30 AM Response to Reply #41 |
145. What I read was that NC law requires that a couple filing for divorce live separately for 1 year |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
1monster
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 02:22 PM Response to Reply #145 |
162. In Florida, if one's home is "homesteaded" (and most are due to the tax break), the homesteaded |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalEsto
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 12:46 PM Response to Reply #41 |
155. I thought she was a lawyer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elleng
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 09:47 PM Response to Reply #3 |
52. Right, and as she said 'owned by me at the time,' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jaysunb
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 11:14 PM Response to Reply #52 |
79. correct |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lex
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 12:03 AM Response to Reply #3 |
94. NC is not a community property state. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MindandSoul
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 06:23 PM Response to Original message |
7. Well done! A great lady! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 06:36 PM Response to Original message |
9. Even if they weren't estranged, it wouldn't have made financial sense |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fire1
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 06:50 PM Response to Reply #9 |
12. Ditto. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sheepshank
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 12:27 PM Response to Reply #9 |
149. agreed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sheepshank
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 12:29 PM Response to Reply #149 |
150. self delete |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JI7
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 06:53 PM Response to Original message |
13. even if they were still together and all that crap didn't happen, why would she leave that stuff to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madokie
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 07:03 PM Response to Original message |
15. Good deal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 02:01 AM Response to Reply #15 |
114. Adultery is like murder--first time is the hardest. I do not believe Hunter |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Backlash Cometh
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 07:15 PM Response to Original message |
16. If that is how she wrote the will there's going to be some serious fighting. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
davidinalameda
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 07:18 PM Response to Reply #16 |
17. you really think he's going to contest the will? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tritsofme
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 07:26 PM Response to Reply #17 |
18. Nothing that from that sleezebag would surprise me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Backlash Cometh
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 07:46 PM Response to Reply #18 |
25. I'm thinking about the kids sorting through it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HillbillyBob
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 10:21 PM Response to Reply #25 |
66. Oh yes, no matter how well a family gets along |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 10:26 PM Response to Reply #66 |
70. You think the 10 and 12 year olds will hire lawyers to go after their 28 yr. old sister? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 02:08 AM Response to Reply #70 |
115. Court has power to appoint a lawyer for minors, to make sure someone is looking out |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 03:02 AM Response to Reply #115 |
122. Why would the court do that? The court might have the power, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pengillian101
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 12:32 AM Response to Reply #66 |
102. Indeed! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CreekDog
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 07:28 PM Response to Reply #17 |
21. that wouldn't be very classy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Backlash Cometh
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 07:42 PM Response to Reply #17 |
22. No, I think the kids are. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TBF
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 09:06 PM Response to Reply #22 |
38. With the older daughter being in her twenties, and the others |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KoKo
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 09:16 PM Response to Reply #22 |
45. Do you know how old her kids all are? Only the oldest daughter in her late 20's is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
roguevalley
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 01:21 AM Response to Reply #45 |
107. I am sure they discussed it in fine detail and I am sure she gave |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Donnachaidh
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 07:26 PM Response to Reply #16 |
20. why? Do you really think she didn't talk to him about her will? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Backlash Cometh
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 07:46 PM Response to Reply #20 |
26. No, I don't think he will. But the kids might fight over things. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JI7
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 07:48 PM Response to Reply #26 |
27. why would the kids fight over those things ? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Backlash Cometh
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 08:08 PM Response to Reply #27 |
29. Oh, for crying out loud. Here's the cut and paste: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tpsbmam
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 11:00 PM Response to Reply #29 |
77. Depends on the family. With 4 kids in our family, we had zero problem divvying |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
roguevalley
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 01:23 AM Response to Reply #29 |
108. my parents died ten months apart. No one argued and grabbed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
47of74
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 10:58 AM Response to Reply #108 |
141. My grandparents are still alive |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
roguevalley
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 12:31 PM Response to Reply #141 |
152. I'm really sorry to hear that. Hugs, honey. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
47of74
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 03:08 PM Response to Reply #152 |
165. Thank you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
roguevalley
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 09:17 PM Response to Reply #165 |
175. her loss. I am glad your family protected your grandparents |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 10:16 PM Response to Reply #26 |
64. Only one of the kids is an adult. I doubt that the young boy and girl |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onehandle
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 08:48 PM Response to Reply #16 |
32. No. It's all personal stuff. He holds the real estate and cash. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 09:57 PM Response to Reply #16 |
56. Why? He's got plenty and he loves his children. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Backlash Cometh
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 10:10 PM Response to Reply #56 |
61. pnwmom, just a word of advice. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 10:22 PM Response to Reply #61 |
67. I read it and I didn't see an answer, other than that you think those little kids |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Backlash Cometh
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 10:44 PM Response to Reply #67 |
76. I've been through one of these things. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 11:44 PM Response to Reply #76 |
88. I've been through several of these things and I know the kind of problems |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 03:48 AM Response to Reply #56 |
129. How do you know he loves his children--or what that means to him? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
unc70
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-11 03:15 AM Response to Reply #129 |
179. Supported by what I have seen and been told by those close to the family |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LynneSin
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 11:16 AM Response to Reply #16 |
144. Why? He's a millionaire in his own right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoapBox
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 07:44 PM Response to Original message |
23. Fabulous...and good for her. RIP. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
janet118
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 07:45 PM Response to Original message |
24. The things listed are personal belongings . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hayu_lol
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 08:17 PM Response to Reply #24 |
30. Outstanding on her part. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TBF
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 09:08 PM Response to Reply #24 |
42. I'm sure he does - they were legally still married right? She just wanted her |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Still a Democrat
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 08:25 PM Response to Original message |
31. Great seeing that slime get stuck n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onehandle
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 08:51 PM Response to Original message |
33. To those celebrating a family tragedy. John holds the bulk of real estate and cash. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cbdo2007
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 08:55 PM Response to Reply #33 |
34. That's what I'm thinking - most of the $$$ was already his. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KoKo
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 09:07 PM Response to Reply #34 |
39. Didn't she have two very successful Books? Royalties...and she opened a store in Chapel Hill over |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dappleganger
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 11:46 PM Response to Reply #33 |
90. Enjoy ourselves, why? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChairmanAgnostic
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 09:00 PM Response to Original message |
35. How . . . Cute. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
roguevalley
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 01:29 AM Response to Reply #35 |
109. I'm sure he had them but given that he was in the public eye |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 02:14 AM Response to Reply #35 |
116. Most married couples have those and still do not sire or birth babies while spouse is dying. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elleng
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 09:03 PM Response to Original message |
36. GREAT NEWS, and thanks to a brave womaan, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pitohui
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 09:06 PM Response to Original message |
37. this should be illegal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TBF
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 09:10 PM Response to Reply #37 |
43. Total BS - John gets the real estate and cash because he is still |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 02:25 AM Response to Reply #43 |
118. Do you know NC law or how John and Elizabeth held their property? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KoKo
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 09:11 PM Response to Reply #37 |
44. It was Her Money...she earned it and maybe family things she inherited that she wanted to go to the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
InvisibleTouch
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 09:19 PM Response to Reply #37 |
47. Disagree. People should be able to leave their estate to anyone they want. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Midwestern Democrat
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 10:23 PM Response to Reply #47 |
68. It doesn't work that way in most (probably all) states. Almost every |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Justitia
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 11:45 PM Response to Reply #68 |
89. In North Carolina he is still entitled to 1/3 of her net assets. -eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lex
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 12:19 AM Response to Reply #89 |
100. Not if they had a standard Separation Agreement he isn't. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Justitia
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 12:50 AM Response to Reply #100 |
105. well, in any event, I really don't see him suing / contesting anyway. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 03:06 AM Response to Reply #100 |
123. I would bet my home they did NOThave a standard agreement. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lex
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 09:01 AM Response to Reply #123 |
136. By standard, I mean having at least the basic terms such as |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aquart
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 11:11 PM Response to Reply #47 |
78. How....libertarian. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
InvisibleTouch
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 11:25 PM Response to Reply #78 |
82. That's insane. In life you can give your assets to anyone you want... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 03:14 AM Response to Reply #82 |
124. Wrong again. You have spousal and child support obligatiions in life |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Union Scribe
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 11:39 PM Response to Reply #78 |
85. So Elizabeth Edwards was a "sadistic, spiteful idiot"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 02:28 AM Response to Reply #47 |
119. Please see Reply 112 and 117. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sparkly
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 09:23 PM Response to Reply #37 |
49. I imagine she didn't want her money going to benefit the other woman's child |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 02:55 AM Response to Reply #49 |
121. Her money may well be held in joint accounts. Story says she left her kids |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 03:29 AM Response to Reply #49 |
127. Meh. I doubt she wanted Hunter having it, too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dappleganger
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 11:47 PM Response to Reply #37 |
91. Well, SHE didn't break that contract. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lex
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 12:16 AM Response to Reply #37 |
98. WTF? They were SEPARATED which means their property had |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
roguevalley
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 01:31 AM Response to Reply #37 |
110. I disagree. It wasn't billions she was talking about but personal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 05:05 AM Response to Reply #37 |
131. He broke that contract. smashed it to smithereens. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msanthrope
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 12:18 PM Response to Reply #37 |
148. It's an operation of law--legal separation and/or divorce voids |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 05:47 PM Response to Reply #37 |
173. No, I just LOVE this form of "rough justice" for this slimebag... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mudplanet
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 09:07 PM Response to Original message |
40. How DU became SOU (soap opera underground) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KoKo
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 09:21 PM Response to Reply #40 |
48. John Edwards was the hope for many DU'ers and his Wife was Loved by Most All...that's Personal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mudplanet
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 09:40 PM Response to Reply #48 |
51. What happened between them was personal. Both back then and right begfore she died. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KoKo
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 10:02 PM Response to Reply #51 |
57. I don't think so...I think it's folks concerned about those kids that they watched throughout two |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mudplanet
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 10:11 PM Response to Reply #57 |
62. Gosh. Heartwarming. And now they get to be intimately involved in their dirty laundry. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dappleganger
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 11:00 AM Response to Reply #51 |
142. Nice try. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lex
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 12:05 AM Response to Reply #40 |
96. How DUers became PN (posting nannies) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mudplanet
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 12:18 AM Response to Reply #96 |
99. touché |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
man4allcats
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 10:05 PM Response to Original message |
58. Good for you, Elizabeth! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pengillian101
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 12:37 AM Response to Reply #58 |
104. K&R! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stray cat
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 10:08 PM Response to Original message |
59. He has money |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pinto
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 10:36 PM Response to Original message |
74. Minority view, but I think it's no one's business but the Edwards'. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Union Scribe
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 11:40 PM Response to Reply #74 |
86. Happy to be a fellow member of that minority. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
William769
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 12:02 AM Response to Reply #74 |
93. I seem to be in the minority on most things. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Arkansas Granny
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 09:57 AM Response to Reply #74 |
139. I'll join you in your minority view. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MissDeeds
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 10:41 PM Response to Original message |
75. Elizabeth was an awesome lady |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Xenotime
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 11:21 PM Response to Original message |
80. This won't stand in court |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HEyHEY
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 11:52 PM Response to Reply #80 |
92. If Edwards is a big enough prick to challenge it, yeah I doubt it would |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lex
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 12:06 AM Response to Reply #80 |
97. Of course it will stand in court. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msanthrope
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 12:23 AM Response to Reply #80 |
101. Of course it will. Legal separation voids any share of her personal property he hoped to have. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 02:45 AM Response to Reply #101 |
120. Do you know NC law on that issue? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msanthrope
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 12:30 PM Response to Reply #120 |
151. Yes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dappleganger
![]() |
Wed Jan-05-11 11:43 PM Response to Original message |
87. Excellent. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NNadir
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 12:37 AM Response to Original message |
103. I can't say I blame her. She was a very fine woman and though I never even thought of voting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 03:23 AM Response to Reply #103 |
125. Marital infidellitiy speaks to things like |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Frisbee
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 01:10 AM Response to Original message |
106. He got everything he deserved. In abundance. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 03:35 AM Response to Original message |
128. Daily News headline is sensationalism, period. But, I am stunned she |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 08:44 AM Response to Reply #128 |
135. What would be a more appropriate headline? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raine
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 04:19 AM Response to Original message |
130. GOOD for Elizabeth |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lumberjack_jeff
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 01:08 PM Response to Reply #130 |
160. The human capacity for vindictiveness is fascinating. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ilsa
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 06:32 AM Response to Original message |
133. I see this news report as a bunch of hype. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VeryConfused
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 08:16 AM Response to Original message |
134. Seems quite reasonable |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dendrobium
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 09:33 AM Response to Original message |
137. Why so angry? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mstinamotorcity
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 09:42 AM Response to Original message |
138. Well his mystical mistress with |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truebrit71
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 10:22 AM Response to Original message |
140. Good for her... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spanone
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 11:01 AM Response to Original message |
143. what took her so long? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MilesColtrane
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 11:46 AM Response to Original message |
146. Anybody heard anything out of the grand jury in Raleigh? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lateedee
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 11:58 AM Response to Original message |
147. What business is it of ours... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
backtomn
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 12:58 PM Response to Reply #147 |
158. She was a "public person"......and this is America.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OrangeGrapes
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 01:01 PM Response to Reply #147 |
159. And why is a news-source like Inside Edition... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sheepshank
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 12:34 PM Response to Original message |
153. Why is it so important for posters to turn Elizabeth into a petty, vindictive shill |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JI7
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 04:35 PM Response to Reply #153 |
171. actually most people see this as something good, something John deserves |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HardWorkingDem
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 12:45 PM Response to Original message |
154. I think postings like this show what is wrong with DU... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
upi402
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 12:53 PM Response to Original message |
157. Edwards was silent when Kucinich was black-listed from debates |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cleita
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 09:19 PM Response to Reply #157 |
176. So was Clinton and Obama. None of them were |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
earth mom
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 01:30 PM Response to Original message |
161. Good! I'm glad! BUT-this clears the way for John to leave all HIS money to Rielles kid. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
unc70
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 11:31 PM Response to Reply #161 |
177. You would lose that bet, though Hunter is capable of trying almost anything |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maru Kitteh
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 02:26 PM Response to Original message |
163. Good for you Elizabeth! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SaveAmerica
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 02:47 PM Response to Original message |
164. That's her version of the southern woman's "Bless His Heart"- heard this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lillypaddle
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 03:21 PM Response to Original message |
166. I dunno ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalLovinLug
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 03:23 PM Response to Original message |
167. She did what she should have done |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vanbean
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 03:32 PM Response to Original message |
168. None of my business. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BigD_95
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 03:48 PM Response to Original message |
169. I must be missing something |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stoic
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 03:55 PM Response to Original message |
170. Is everyone having fun wallowing in another family's misery? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Citizen Worker
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 05:05 PM Response to Original message |
172. Is this revelation going to change the political/economic conditions here? Why in the hell is this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kaleva
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 11:43 PM Response to Original message |
178. There's probably a reason why she did that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 07:51 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC