|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
![]() |
EFerrari
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 03:02 PM Original message |
What do you think of this? James O'Keefe managed to tank ACORN |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PDJane
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 03:03 PM Response to Original message |
1. It's very convenient......... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tosh
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 03:07 PM Response to Reply #1 |
4. For certain, not alone. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 03:22 PM Response to Reply #1 |
11. Clearly he gets funding for his scams. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
emulatorloo
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 03:06 PM Response to Original message |
2. I think you are right. There was a coordinated effort to scapegoat and demonize ACORN |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leveymg
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 03:07 PM Response to Original message |
3. Foreclosures are like the plague. Not too many people want to talk about it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 03:11 PM Response to Reply #3 |
6. Foreclosure elicits some kind of shame, so yeah, people don't want to think |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Erose999
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 03:14 PM Response to Reply #6 |
8. Wasn't Britefart behind the firing of Dan Rather as well? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 03:17 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. I don't know. Sounds like one of his deals. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hlthe2b
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 03:08 PM Response to Original message |
5. Yup... When one looks up "smarmy POS" in the online dictionary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Erose999
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 03:12 PM Response to Original message |
7. The RW had always been after ACORN. The O'queefe videos just gave them a convinient excuse to drop |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 03:16 PM Response to Reply #7 |
9. But the Senate JUMPED on this. The Senate never jumps on anything. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 03:35 PM Response to Original message |
12. no. fox news did. they just used okeefe to do it. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 03:37 PM Response to Reply #12 |
13. Well, it certainly was Fake News. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Uncle Joe
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 03:41 PM Response to Reply #12 |
15. I will take you one step further, FOX used Okeefe and the Congress used FOX, now who used |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 03:43 PM Response to Reply #15 |
17. Maybe one thing to do is to look up who brought this flap to the floor of the Senate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 05:47 PM Response to Reply #15 |
30. lol. and the corp dudes. ya, you are right. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
starroute
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 03:37 PM Response to Original message |
14. Look to the Heritage Foundation nexus |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 03:42 PM Response to Reply #14 |
16. Good call. Thanks for the tips. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
suffragette
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 04:39 PM Response to Reply #16 |
24. I posted about O'Keefe and the Leadership Institute |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 04:41 PM Response to Reply #24 |
25. Ha! Thanks! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
suffragette
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 05:09 PM Response to Reply #25 |
28. That's true. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 05:20 PM Response to Reply #28 |
29. Thanks, suffragette. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
suffragette
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 07:17 PM Response to Reply #29 |
33. I think you're on to something with this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 11:20 PM Response to Reply #33 |
34. Happy New Year! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jotsy
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 04:01 PM Response to Original message |
18. Follow the money! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 04:06 PM Response to Reply #18 |
19. I remember Brad staying on that for *weeks*. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hootinholler
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 04:14 PM Response to Original message |
20. That's an interesting set of dots you have there Beth |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 04:22 PM Response to Reply #20 |
21. Lowering the drawbridge. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
formercia
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 04:29 PM Response to Original message |
22. I agree 100% |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 04:35 PM Response to Reply #22 |
23. And now suddenly, the States do have jurisdiction -- the Feds handed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
formercia
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 04:46 PM Response to Reply #23 |
26. The Banksters got the money. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 04:57 PM Response to Reply #26 |
27. They ran the board. That wasn't obvious when the attack on ACORN |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Horse with no Name
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 05:49 PM Response to Original message |
31. I think even being aware of what is going down |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Thu Jan-06-11 05:54 PM Response to Reply #31 |
32. Reading the wikileaks cables really helped me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dreamnightwind
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-11 03:27 AM Response to Original message |
35. K & R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Swamp Rat
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-11 05:38 AM Response to Original message |
36. k&r |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Senator
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-11 11:14 AM Response to Original message |
37. K&+R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thu Mar 13th 2025, 12:12 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC