|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
Cali_Democrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-06-11 03:47 PM Original message |
Poll question: Do you approve of Obama's choice of William Daley as the next White House Chief of Staff? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Toucano (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-06-11 03:48 PM Response to Original message |
1. What? No "HELL NO" option? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gateley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-06-11 03:50 PM Response to Original message |
2. I'm not going to judge him because he's affiliated w/J.P. Morgan although I'm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rurallib (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-06-11 03:52 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. I am right where you are. But for goodness sake |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vi5 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-06-11 03:56 PM Response to Reply #4 |
11. Shit, at this point.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gateley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-06-11 04:05 PM Response to Reply #4 |
19. Agree - there are SO MANY good liberals for each of the positions where he's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OKNancy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-06-11 04:01 PM Response to Reply #2 |
17. He was Al Gore's campaign manager.. a few points for that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gateley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-06-11 04:06 PM Response to Reply #17 |
20. I didn't know that. I think that says SOMEthing. :-) nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OKNancy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-06-11 04:13 PM Response to Reply #20 |
28. Gore said he would have won if he had Daley on sooner |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gateley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-06-11 04:26 PM Response to Reply #28 |
33. Thanks! Many here are dissing him and I'm so tired of feeling like there's no light |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eilen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-06-11 11:50 PM Response to Reply #28 |
53. 2 Unsuccessful campaigns. How is that good? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
walldude (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-06-11 04:12 PM Response to Reply #17 |
27. Al Gore LOST!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
theaocp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-06-11 04:26 PM Response to Reply #17 |
34. Gore also picked Lieberman as VP candidate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DrDan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-06-11 05:09 PM Response to Reply #34 |
42. did he really? or was he selected for him? I always wondered about how he actually got that spot. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-06-11 04:38 PM Response to Reply #17 |
39. Looks like he was one of the people telling Gore to give up: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Swamp Rat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-07-11 12:43 AM Response to Reply #39 |
60. BAM!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
walldude (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-06-11 04:11 PM Response to Reply #2 |
26. Sure is, he was the chairman of the NAFTA taks force committee |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Caliman73 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-07-11 12:41 AM Response to Reply #2 |
59. How about a NO for his work on NAFTA? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ozymanithrax (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-06-11 03:51 PM Response to Original message |
3. Let's see what kind of job he does first. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gateley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-06-11 04:07 PM Response to Reply #3 |
23. Exactly. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SidDithers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-06-11 05:22 PM Response to Reply #3 |
45. Pshaw!... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FSogol (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-06-11 03:53 PM Response to Original message |
5. Howard Dean thinks he's a good choice. Shouldn't Obama pick who he wants? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Toucano (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-06-11 03:55 PM Response to Reply #5 |
8. From all indications, he has picked who he wants. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Better Believe It (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-06-11 03:57 PM Response to Reply #5 |
13. I disagree with Howard Dean on this one. Yes, Obama is free to pick a Wall Streeter if he's more |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lillypaddle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-06-11 04:08 PM Response to Reply #13 |
25. My understanding is that Daley is NOT a Wallstreeter |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Better Believe It (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-06-11 04:24 PM Response to Reply #25 |
32. So he's bankster. Or was he a teller? Thanks for the correction. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
theaocp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-06-11 04:28 PM Response to Reply #32 |
35. At least since NAFTA, heya? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lillypaddle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-06-11 04:31 PM Response to Reply #32 |
37. You make me feel so small |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eilen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-06-11 11:52 PM Response to Reply #32 |
54. Tying them down and smothering them maybe. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jakes Progress (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-06-11 04:03 PM Response to Reply #5 |
18. Read the "endorsement". It was more |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lillypaddle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-06-11 04:07 PM Response to Reply #5 |
21. Absolutely agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FSogol (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-06-11 04:08 PM Response to Reply #21 |
24. +1. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fascisthunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-06-11 05:17 PM Response to Reply #5 |
44. as if we had power to stop him from picking another corporate whore |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vi5 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-06-11 03:53 PM Response to Original message |
6. Once again, he makes a decision... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bobthedrummer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-06-11 03:54 PM Response to Original message |
7. No, I don't. ..Chicago, Chicago that big bankster's town, Chicago, Chicago it's all around! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ecstatic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-06-11 03:55 PM Response to Original message |
9. It's not my business |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Brickbat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-06-11 03:56 PM Response to Original message |
10. I have to say I think the whole "oh, let's wait and see how it turns out" idea cracks me up. What, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Little Star (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-06-11 03:58 PM Response to Reply #10 |
16. We've seen plenty already. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Brickbat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-06-11 04:07 PM Response to Reply #16 |
22. Exactly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
walldude (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-06-11 04:14 PM Response to Reply #10 |
29. It's amazing to watch. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Angry Dragon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-06-11 03:56 PM Response to Original message |
12. I voted I do not know |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Little Star (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-06-11 03:57 PM Response to Original message |
14. Nope.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tierra_y_Libertad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-06-11 03:58 PM Response to Original message |
15. Birds of a feather...Obama, Daley, J.P. Morgan Chase. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lucian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-06-11 04:15 PM Response to Original message |
30. Hell no. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GSLevel9 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-06-11 04:17 PM Response to Original message |
31. more evidence of POTUS INC. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madokie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-06-11 04:29 PM Response to Original message |
36. Why hell yeah |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Recursion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-06-11 04:31 PM Response to Original message |
38. I'm less worried about his having worked for Morgan... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Odin2005 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-06-11 04:53 PM Response to Original message |
40. It proves that Obama is nothing but a Corporate suck-up, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AngryAmish (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-06-11 06:54 PM Response to Reply #40 |
50. No. It just proves Obama is a machine guy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BobbyBoring (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-06-11 05:02 PM Response to Original message |
41. This will be a screeching |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fascisthunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-06-11 05:17 PM Response to Original message |
43. hell no |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SidDithers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-06-11 05:23 PM Response to Original message |
46. I approve because watching all the exploding heads is great entertainment..nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Scurrilous (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-06-11 05:26 PM Response to Reply #46 |
47. LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lamp_shade (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-06-11 05:33 PM Response to Reply #46 |
48. Me too LOL. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cali_Democrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-06-11 06:47 PM Response to Reply #46 |
49. You're more concerned about heads exploding than policy? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Telly Savalas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-06-11 07:36 PM Response to Reply #46 |
52. Heads would explode no matter who he picked. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eilen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-07-11 12:00 AM Response to Reply #52 |
55. I'd rather see Right Wing heads explode |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Arkana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-06-11 07:22 PM Response to Original message |
51. I'm withholding judgment until I see how Daley does as CoS. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Capt_John (33 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-07-11 12:01 AM Response to Original message |
56. no |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kat45 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-07-11 12:08 AM Response to Original message |
57. I read that he was the architect of Clinton's NAFTA |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PhillySane (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-07-11 12:29 AM Response to Original message |
58. DO NOT TRY TO ADJUST YOUR TV SET! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Swamp Rat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-07-11 12:48 AM Response to Reply #58 |
61. We control everything, the words you read, the songs you sing.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eridani (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-07-11 01:17 AM Response to Original message |
62. Great. One more overpaid bankster whore is just what we need. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon Jan 20th 2025, 06:47 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC