|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
![]() |
dkf
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-11 12:11 PM Original message |
What are the odds the Supreme Court sides with Obama and allows the individual mandate to stand? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MineralMan
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-11 12:12 PM Response to Original message |
1. What case are you talking about? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dkf
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-11 12:15 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. They are saying on MSNBC that they think the HCR individual mandate will probably go to the Supreme |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MineralMan
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-11 12:18 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. Oh, OK. I don't know how the court would rule on that one. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueDemKev
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-11 12:39 PM Response to Reply #3 |
8. Consider this.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onehandle
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-11 12:14 PM Response to Original message |
2. I think pretty good, since it benefits their corporate masters. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dkf
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-11 12:17 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. And we thought they stood for states rights til they got to Bush v Gore. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hughee99
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-11 12:25 PM Response to Original message |
6. I'd say Zero. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueDemKev
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-11 12:35 PM Response to Reply #6 |
7. Don't be so sure.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hughee99
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-11 12:58 PM Response to Reply #7 |
9. While you certainly make a valid argument... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
qazplm
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-11 01:05 PM Response to Reply #9 |
10. Scalia doesn't matter |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KansDem
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-11 01:10 PM Response to Reply #9 |
11. The problem is that health care has become a marketing issue... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueDemKev
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-11 01:44 PM Response to Reply #9 |
13. Yes, that's possible.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hughee99
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-11 03:37 PM Response to Reply #13 |
15. If the argument is pushed that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mdmc
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-11 01:11 PM Response to Original message |
12. very good odds, imho |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GeorgeGist
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-11 03:28 PM Response to Original message |
14. You mean the Private Mandate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dkf
![]() |
Fri Jan-07-11 07:34 PM Response to Reply #14 |
16. Yes. Private insurance. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 06:34 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC