Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The art of interruption

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-19-11 01:02 PM
Original message
The art of interruption
what does it say when someone constantly and vigorously interrupts another during a conversation?

Is is that he or she has absolutely no interest in what the person is saying?

Or is it a way to throw one off his game, i.e., make him lose his train of thought?

If you saw the Jon Stewert/Chris Wallace "interview", you'll know what I'm talking about.

I find it rude and disrespectful. And I wish Stewert had called him on it.

I think Fox News runs workshops where they train their television personalities the art of constant interruption.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Sarah Ibarruri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-19-11 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. So true.
Unfortunately, the news media now only consists of tabloid reporting and news interviews and forums are also affected by the tabloid mentality. It's like a circus. Reporters are not what they once were. They no longer research, and they've become conflict-creators so as to entertain, and not to inform.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-19-11 01:17 PM
Response to Original message
2. It can be rudeness, for sure. It can also be regional.
In some parts of the country, NYC, for example, linguists have found it much more common for people to talk over and interrupt each other -- also to speak more quickly. It can certainly feel overwhelming when you're not used to it. Or even when you are!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dynasaw Donating Member (664 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-19-11 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
3. Rampant egotism
We are living in a culture where it's all about I, me and mine. Meaningful exchange is about respect for the other person,
her/his views and his/her humanity. Narcissistic people have no regard for others except where other people serve
their needs. Fox news and television programs simply reinforce a style which says it's o.k. to ramrod your presence and ride roughshod
over other people.

In many interviews if you've noticed interviewers often ask "questions" that are often longer than the responses from their "guests."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-19-11 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
4. Narcissism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-19-11 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
5. Chris Wallace has a short attention span, as do most Fox News viewers.
It's a structural flaw - like reading The NY Post, and expecting to get in-depth analysis - it's just impossible there. I don't understand why anyone even grants them interviews or appears on that network.

I agree, Chris Wallace is also rude as hell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-19-11 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
6. My hubby has a friend who interrupts ALL the time. I found a way to make him stop even if just for
that particular conversation. When he interrupts, I let him finish then say "excuse me for talking while you are interrupting" Like I said it works for that particular conversation, I use it quite often on him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wounded Bear Donating Member (665 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-19-11 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
7. Fear........
They are so afraid that someone will hear what their opponents have to say and actually realize it makes sense that they interrupt and talk over anything they try to say.

They can't let any progressive ideas actually get any real air time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-19-11 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
8. someone did a good analysis of this method with the O'Reilly Obama interview
If you interrupt, someone can't finish their thought and get their message out.

If it's an articulate opponent that you can't get away with belittling or smearing because the audience has too much respect for them, that's all you're left with as a defense.

That's why Fox News does it when Obama comes on and why they do it when their people go on shows like Stewart. They don't want lefties to score points with the portion of their audience that isn't hardcore righties or see their stars made to look like the fools they are when they go on a show like Stewart.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wounded Bear Donating Member (665 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-19-11 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Like I said......fear......see above. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-19-11 04:08 PM
Response to Original message
10. I think it varies... among tv pundits, it is clearly a rude tactic...
In social settings, it can be overt egoism, or it can sometimes be nothing more than excitement with respect to a story someone really wants to relay, or it can be frustration among those trying to break previous patterns... I know when I see groups of friends I haven't seen in a long time, it takes virtually no time for the usual patterns to recur, with one or two always the "aggressors" in terms of dominating the discussion and at least one of the group the "sympathy" participant--the one that a member of the group will finally--after much delay--think to ask what it is THEY have been up to.

But, if you are a female who has had to deal with male-dominated workplaces, you may have adopted some rather rude interruption habits--for no other reason than to avoid being totally ignored. It is a fine line for a woman to do that and there ought to be workshops on how to do it effectively.... Women generally are perceived as rude and disrespectful for doing the very same things men get away with. :shrug:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-19-11 04:13 PM
Response to Original message
11. Republicans actually DO train their "advocates" to interrupt
A guy on CNN once told about how they train them to interrupt every SEVEN SECONDS..and when it;s "their turn" to speak, they speak fast and never stop when told their time is up..

Eat the clock.... that;s their tried & true method..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 07:07 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC