|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
![]() |
cali
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 03:48 PM Original message |
well this should be massively unpopular: No, I don't believe Palin should be indicted on this matter |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JustFiveMoreMinutes
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 03:50 PM Response to Original message |
1. AHA, but what about PUBLICALLY indicted.. not crminally!?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 03:50 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. you betcha. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Goblinmonger
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 03:50 PM Response to Original message |
2. I agree with you. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
emilyg
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 04:39 PM Response to Reply #2 |
59. So do I. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sadbear
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 03:51 PM Response to Original message |
4. As long as she's indicted in the court of public opinion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OregonBlue
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 03:52 PM Response to Reply #4 |
9. Indicted in the court of public opinion is good with me. Stick a fork in her, she's done. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cirque du So-What
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 03:51 PM Response to Original message |
5. No argument from me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Seedersandleechers
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 03:54 PM Response to Reply #5 |
15. Political ambitions? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cirque du So-What
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 03:59 PM Response to Reply #15 |
23. OK, I'll rephrase |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Enrique
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 03:51 PM Response to Original message |
6. if you mean literally indicted, I agree with you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 03:52 PM Response to Reply #6 |
10. Deleted message |
cali
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 03:59 PM Response to Reply #10 |
22. yep. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
timtom
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 04:42 PM Response to Reply #22 |
63. Cali, I almost have to reluctantly agree with you on this one |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
digitaln3rd
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 04:12 PM Response to Reply #10 |
44. Sadly, true. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 03:52 PM Response to Reply #6 |
11. yes. lots of people here are saying that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
walldude
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 03:57 PM Response to Reply #6 |
21. Yeah I did. But it won't happen.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Enrique
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 04:01 PM Response to Reply #21 |
27. is that really true about a Muslim or a mobster? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
underseasurveyor
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 04:18 PM Response to Reply #27 |
50. Comparable to palin's campaign? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 04:01 PM Response to Reply #21 |
28. baloney. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
walldude
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 04:08 PM Response to Reply #28 |
39. Here ya go |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hlthe2b
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 03:52 PM Response to Original message |
7. She should be shunned... The Amish knew a thing or two ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ozymanithrax
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 03:52 PM Response to Original message |
8. I and Voltaire agree... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pathwalker
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 03:53 PM Response to Original message |
12. She's morally culpable. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 03:53 PM Response to Original message |
13. Deleted message |
Barack_America
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 03:53 PM Response to Original message |
14. "unrec wildly to your hearts' content." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RainDog
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 03:55 PM Response to Original message |
16. I hope this becomes the media moment when Palin becomes so toxic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Celeborn Skywalker
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 03:56 PM Response to Original message |
17. I don't think she should be indicted. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
X_Digger
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 03:56 PM Response to Original message |
18. Agreed. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
purrFect
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 03:57 PM Response to Original message |
19. well, that's just a cop out. She won't be held legally liable, but lets hope she will be held... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Texasgal
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 03:57 PM Response to Original message |
20. regardless of whether Palin is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
devilgrrl
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 03:59 PM Response to Original message |
24. I agree with you Cali - I think Bill Kristol should be indicted for unleashing her on the nation! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Davis_X_Machina
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 04:01 PM Response to Reply #24 |
29. Under which statute, pray tell? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
devilgrrl
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 04:04 PM Response to Reply #29 |
32. Under satire... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Texasgal
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 04:06 PM Response to Reply #32 |
35. Wayyy over! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
devilgrrl
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 04:07 PM Response to Reply #35 |
37. Totally! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Davis_X_Machina
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 04:10 PM Response to Reply #37 |
41. Forgive me for having rushed to the conclusion... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
devilgrrl
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 04:18 PM Response to Reply #41 |
49. I'm sorry that you are unaware that it was Bill Kristol that introduced Palin to John McCain... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Davis_X_Machina
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 04:23 PM Response to Reply #49 |
52. How is that a crime, though? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
underseasurveyor
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 04:27 PM Response to Reply #52 |
54. Please tell me you're kidding. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Davis_X_Machina
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 04:30 PM Response to Reply #54 |
55. I'm a language teacher... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
devilgrrl
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 04:33 PM Response to Reply #55 |
57. I'm glad you know words - shame about the humor deficiency. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Davis_X_Machina
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 04:40 PM Response to Reply #57 |
61. I'm not sure... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
devilgrrl
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 04:47 PM Response to Reply #61 |
65. Oh no... that will get me to lose sleep! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
underseasurveyor
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 04:39 PM Response to Reply #55 |
60. Sarcasm and context count for something too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
devilgrrl
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 04:45 PM Response to Reply #60 |
64. Mind blowing isn't it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
underseasurveyor
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 04:50 PM Response to Reply #64 |
67. Here's to you ~n~ me devilgrrl |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lifesbeautifulmagic
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 03:59 PM Response to Original message |
25. Sarah sickens me however I do believe that she is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fire1
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 04:00 PM Response to Original message |
26. If you collectively combine her rhetoric with that of limbaugh, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 04:03 PM Response to Reply #26 |
31. OK, but unless you have EVIDENCE that she meant it literally |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fire1
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 04:14 PM Response to Reply #31 |
47. The fact that she felt it necessary to erase her "hit list" from |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 04:03 PM Response to Original message |
30. Deleted message |
Name removed
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 04:06 PM Response to Reply #30 |
34. Deleted message |
cali
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 04:13 PM Response to Reply #30 |
46. That's patently false. disgusting attack. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Arctic Dave
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 04:05 PM Response to Original message |
33. Is she criminally responsible? Maybe not, but I hope it doesn't stop |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spanone
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 04:07 PM Response to Original message |
36. she may have not been in the movie, but she was at least the set designer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Velveteen Ocelot
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 04:08 PM Response to Original message |
38. I don't think she could be indicted. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Wielding Truth
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 04:08 PM Response to Original message |
40. I think that she knew that her words were dangerous but she did not stop. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warpy
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 04:10 PM Response to Original message |
42. I think she needs to be thoroughly condemned outside the courtroom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ikonoklast
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 04:12 PM Response to Original message |
43. She can use whatever rhetoric she is legally allowed to use. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Unvanguard
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 04:12 PM Response to Original message |
45. Obviously she shouldn't be indicted. Just criticized. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JI7
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 04:18 PM Response to Original message |
48. is anyone saying she should be legally charged for this ? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Davis_X_Machina
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 04:48 PM Response to Reply #48 |
66. Yes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nye Bevan
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 05:28 PM Response to Reply #66 |
71. Many many more. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Davis_X_Machina
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 06:05 PM Response to Reply #71 |
72. You're named after one of my heroes.... n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fleshdancer
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 04:21 PM Response to Original message |
51. leaders don't get to choose the level of mental health of their followers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dorkulon
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 04:25 PM Response to Original message |
53. I agree. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stray cat
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 04:31 PM Response to Original message |
56. Agreed. But I would like to see anyone promoting hate speech alienated by society |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bjorn Against
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 04:38 PM Response to Original message |
58. I actually agree with you... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pancho Sanza
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 04:41 PM Response to Original message |
62. Pleased to recommend a post of rational sanity. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hugabear
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 04:52 PM Response to Original message |
68. Oh come on...you don't think that she knows her audience? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Urban Prairie
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 04:53 PM Response to Original message |
69. Palin desperately needs to continue to ramp up her rightwinger rhetoric |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Exilednight
![]() |
Sun Jan-09-11 04:58 PM Response to Original message |
70. What she did is just as wrong as someone yelling fire in theatre. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 06:46 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC