RimJob calls for "Political Blood in the Streets" if Obama invokes 14th

[Skip_In_Boulder]

Obama to rule by executive order? Bring it on!!
July 27, 2011 | Jim Robinson
Posted on Wed Jul 27 2011 14:00:37 GMT-0600 (Mountain Daylight Time) by Jim Robinson

My FRiends, it's becoming more and more obvious every day that Obama and the Democrats are out to purposely destroy America. They're using crisis mode to piece by piece dismantle the constitution. First it was the too big to fail crisis that led to the unconstitutional TARP program, the feds unconstitutionally taking over private sector corporations, the unconstitutional bailouts and the unconstitutional trillion dollar porkulus package. Follow that with the unconstitutional federal takeover of our healthcare system and his unconstitutional bypass of the senate's advice and consent function regarding presidential appointments (czars). Then it was thumbing his nose at the congress by conducting and continuing war in Libya without congressional approval.

{snip}

This would be the constitutional crisis of the century. We ain't seen nothing yet. This would make Nixon look like a Boy Scout and the constitutional crisis of the 70's a church picnic. If Obama does this, political blood will flow in the streets. Impeached or not, this will be political suicide for Obama and the democrats. Bring it on!!

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2754723/posts

[Critters2]

1. Didn't TARP happen under Bush? nt

[Skip_In_Boulder]

5. Yeah, but don't confuse them with facts

It really upsets them.

[Liberalynn]

52. They so love to rewrite history

even when its recent.

[krispos42]

27. So did the too-big-to-fail crisis.

But shhhhhh... he's on a roll.

[demwing]

49. No, It happened when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor

but forget it, he's rolling...

[Critters2]

53. !

:rofl:

[treestar]

2. The right and left are starting to sound very similar

I've read each of these sentiments right here.

[DCBob]

7. you noticed that too?

disturbing isnt it.

[villager]

11. Link to "the left" calling for blood in the streets, if Obama uses the 14th?

:shrug:

[DCBob]

16. maybe on a different issue but the same type of threats.

[villager]

17. Link to "the left" calling for "blood in the streets" -- outside of your own assertions, that is?

:shrug:

[DCBob]

19. omg.. do you read??? Almost everyday there is something posted about pitchforks and guillotines.

[villager]

22. so you equate those who sound alarms about collapse leading to violence with those advocating it?

:shrug:

[DCBob]

23. pitchforks and guillotines dont mean "blood in the streets" ???

[villager]

24. again, we only have your assertions, hence no context

So, where did you read "the left" posting such alarming things?

[DCBob]

26. you must be newbie here or very selective what you read.

[villager]

29. I guess no more selective than what you're willing to link to, before condemning it outright?

n/t

[sabrina 1]

31. You still haven't linked to any of those posts. I'm not a 'newbie'

here and I have never seen anything like this on DU. But I might have missed it, so could you please post a link to this kind of advocacy for 'blood in the streets' that has been posted here?

[DCBob]

34. aint going do it.. I dont have time to educate newbies.

[nadinbrzezinski]

36. I will say this though

while those pots do exists, and are also removed from the database... yes that happens... here is the major difference. If Sknner was posting that, or Elad, it would be equivalent. Now last time I checked neither of them will post advocacy for the overthrow of the government of the US.

So we need to be careful. These are very rare posts that actually have a clear advocacy for sedition... (by the technical definition) and it is NOT the owner.

So we need a little honesty here.

[villager]

38. Newbies? Been here about 8 years longer than you, DCBub!

;-)

[DCBob]

39. I know.. just messing with you.

[villager]

42. well, since your footer links to a climate change report, we'll let it slide...

;-)

[DCBob]

43. thanks.. I am on your side.. usually.

;)

btw, I own that site. bit out of date but I try.

[nadinbrzezinski]

28. No we have had posts here calling for revolution

and actually looking forwards to it. They are rare.. but they do exist...

And as I said here, this is the exact pattern one sees before a hot civil war... cold phase might be coming to an end, and soon.

NO, I am not looking forwards to it... 20-100 million dead is a real possibility... oh and the crisis in DC is the kind of real constitutional crisis similar to 1859-1860...

[villager]

37. I know there are posts dreading it, or even expositing its "inevitability" - but applauding the

...fallout?

I for one think it's inevitable, from an ecological/systemic point, that the U.S. will "devolve" into smaller constituent pieces, and probably not all of them will be republics.

But that's not the same as Freeper glee at bloodshed...

[nadinbrzezinski]

40. They are rare as hell, and they go into the missing topic

category.

That said, here is the difference, which I pointed to Dcob... this is the site owner advocating sedition. The equivalent, which you will not see, would be Skinner or Elad doing the same thing.

That said, we are in that pattern now and yes, you have both sides doing it... but we need to qualify who does it.

For the right their fringe has become mainstream. For the left, the last time anybody even acted on this the calendar read 1972 or so...

We are in that pattern and in my view it is inevitable, but the "left" will not start the shooting. I am almost waiting for Ft. Sumter to be honest.

[villager]

46. Good distinctions, Nadin. I too wonder what our next "Ft. Sumter" moment will be...

...and what kind of tinder that spark will light...

[socialist_n_TN]

55. "....but the "left" will not start the shooting."

No we won't. But some of us will shoot back. I believe in self defense, personally and as a class.

[nadinbrzezinski]

56. Oh once that starts

it will quickly degrade into a brawl.

It will not be a blue\gray thing... that is a fantasy... but it will quickly degrade.

I suspect RW paramilitaries to be honest... and the militias are a good place to start...

Hey happy thoughts huh?

[Odin2005]

61. Think late Roman Republic, Marius' supporters vs. Sulla's

[nadinbrzezinski]

63. I got a more recent example

my mind goes to the paramilitaries. All that is needed is for one group to play a blind eye to oh the Hutare militia for example... and the fun will start.

[bluestate10]

62. Treestar was alluding to the my way or the highway tone. nt

[nadinbrzezinski]

25. Why do you think I keep bringing up 1859?

It is the exact pattern.

[mmonk]

50. Only in certain minds.

[Odin2005]

58. False equivalency.

They are defenders of the PTB, we are not.

[grasswire]

3. .....and please donate today

You forgot that part.

[Skip_In_Boulder]

8. Yeah I saw that and thought about putting it in

Rimjob never misses an opportunity to relive his minions of their money. But then again, he's a Republican.

[tularetom]

4. If you keep visiting that site you will go blind

and hair will grow on your palms.

[Skip_In_Boulder]

12. I made an oath that

I would quit doing it when I started to need glasses.

[emulatorloo]

6. Memo to rimjob: TARP was bush. 2. Invoking the Constitution doesn't "dismantle" the Constitution.

That sentence doesn't even make sense.

Ok, none of it makes sense.

[ChoppinBroccoli]

9. Apparently, Right-Wingers Think Anything They Don't Like Is "Unconstitutional"

I didn't see a single thing in his laundry list that is unconstitutional.

[Scurrilous]

10. He hasn't a leg to stand on. n/t

[Skip_In_Boulder]

13. Oh that is Really bad. n/t

[white_wolf]

14. I can't decide which site is worse

Stormfront or Free Republic? At least the neo-Nazis are honest about their fascist and racist goals. Since free republic always seems to have money problems, maybe they should just merge?

[murray hill farm]

15. Not blood...just lots of Repuke outrage!

They hope they can convince us all that it would be a disaster and the country will rise up in anger, but not true. Some will try with all they got to stir up that anger, but the American people will be too busy sighing a sigh of relief that this is over and trying to just catch up on the sleep they loss worrying about this mess. Even the teabaggers are now feeling worried about their Social security and Medicare...and will sigh a sigh of relief that this folly is over.

[Skip_In_Boulder]

20. Yeah but this is the kind of stuff

that motivates these lone wolf assassins like we just saw in Norway. It is just dangerous speech to be spewing to a group of people who aren't wrapped real tight to begin with. Words really do have consequences.

[Turbineguy]

18. Tell him

it's not necessary for him to cut his throat publicly. We have too much entertainment as it is.

[GreenPartyVoter]

21. "They're using crisis mode to piece by piece dismantle the constitution." Hmmm... This sounds

familiar somehow.

[krispos42]

32. You accuse the other side of doing publically what you are doing below the radar.

Examples:

• Wealth redistribution
  
• Deficit spending
  
• Dismantling the constitution
  
• Spreading propaganda
  
• Controlling the media
  
• Waging class war
  
• Expanding government power
  
• Reducing individual freedoms

[GreenPartyVoter]

35. Exactly! It's that projection thing again.

[krispos42]

47. "When did you stop drowning baby kittens?"

See how it works?

[wizstars]

57. must've gotten that play from the last coach n/t

[AtomicKitten]

30. Translation: "Oh shit. He could do this." (I hope he does.) nm

[murray hill farm]

48. Yep!

The thing is that they so, so need something that they think they can really, really go after him for and really, really get him. They have tried everything..birther crap, religion crap and every made up "scandal" they can try to create and nothing works. He is a president with no scandals in his past or present. So, they keep trying to get him/force him into something..anything that they can then sink their rotten teeth into really get him. This wouldn't work either..although they would sure try to make it so..and...really, no matter how this turns out they will blame him, try to empeach him..whatever. That may be the only reason we are at this point at this time. Will he save the country or not, they must be thinking...and either way, we got him. They are wrong.

[sakabatou]

33. If any real blood spills, it'll be on his hands.

[Warren DeMontague]

41. He sounds like he took TWO big squishy shits in his depends when he wrote that.

He's clearly excited.

[nadinbrzezinski]

44. Stochastic Terrorism... this is a textbook example

and while funny... in reality it is not.

[Skip_In_Boulder]

45. No it's not funny

Particularly in the context that we are currently operating in.

[nadinbrzezinski]

51. Yep, to some it may, but the implications are serious

[rucky]

54. He's gotta get out of his mom's basement, first. n/t

[rurallib]

59. Hey RimJob - you still getting SS and Medicare?

[Odin2005]

60. Somwebody read this fucker the Riot Act.