|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
![]() |
Octafish
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 03:25 PM Original message |
Can anyone name a liberal, progressive or 'left' pundit who's called for violence? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TygrBright
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 03:29 PM Response to Original message |
1. Well, the Rudester frequently alludes to highly perverted and, um, unusual... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Octafish
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 03:43 PM Response to Reply #1 |
8. Limbaugh and his words reveal a lot about his sick psyche. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madinmaryland
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 09:39 PM Response to Reply #1 |
94. The Rude One has an audience of what two or three thousand that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cetacea
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 03:31 PM Response to Original message |
2. Nope.I wouldn't be a liberal if they did. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Octafish
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 04:38 PM Response to Reply #2 |
36. Absolutely. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 03:31 PM Response to Original message |
3. How about elected officials? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Octafish
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 04:40 PM Response to Reply #3 |
37. That's the thing...Right-wingers have gotten away with calling for violence for decades. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kwolf68
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 03:33 PM Response to Original message |
4. Abbie Hoffman |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gregorian
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 03:48 PM Response to Reply #4 |
9. Well, Malcolm X did say "Stop singing and start swinging". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 03:50 PM Response to Reply #9 |
14. Was Malcolm X a "pundit"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gregorian
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 04:28 PM Response to Reply #14 |
33. No. He was making a legitimate point. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal_Stalwart71
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 05:57 PM Response to Reply #9 |
57. Malcolm X wasn't a liberal. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gregorian
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 06:21 PM Response to Reply #57 |
60. I was afraid someone would say that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal_Stalwart71
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 06:48 PM Response to Reply #60 |
66. He was neither. He was apolitical and non-ideological. He was, however, very |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
H2O Man
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 08:55 PM Response to Reply #66 |
83. Somewhat accurate, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal_Stalwart71
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 09:03 PM Response to Reply #83 |
85. Yeah, he did in later years of life, but there is nothing in his writings or speeches |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
H2O Man
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 09:19 PM Response to Reply #85 |
90. Nor did I |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal_Stalwart71
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 09:31 PM Response to Reply #90 |
92. O.K. Calm down. I see your point. I just didn't see any evidence |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 09:37 PM Response to Reply #92 |
93. Deleted message |
Gregorian
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 11:24 PM Response to Reply #90 |
104. I guess I opened my mouth where I shouldn't have. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tabasco
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 06:33 PM Response to Reply #9 |
64. Was Malcolm X a "leftie?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Octafish
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 03:48 PM Response to Reply #4 |
11. You may have me there, but Abbie Hoffman didn't actually incite people to do it from a bully pulpit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 03:49 PM Response to Reply #4 |
12. I believe the OP used the term "pundit" for a reason. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
denverbill
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 04:00 PM Response to Reply #12 |
22. Yes, and I don't consider Malcolm X or Abbie Hoffman 'liberals' or progressives. They were radicals |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kickysnana
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 07:39 PM Response to Reply #22 |
79. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftstreet
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 03:50 PM Response to Reply #4 |
15. PUNDIT n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
H2O Man
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 04:01 PM Response to Reply #4 |
23. Oh, please. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Recursion
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 03:37 PM Response to Original message |
5. Ever? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Octafish
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 04:43 PM Response to Reply #5 |
38. If you got a name, I'd like to read it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Recursion
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 04:57 PM Response to Reply #38 |
42. Well if you are talking about ever in history, there have pretty obiously been tons |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rex
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 05:50 PM Response to Reply #42 |
54. How did you come up with Lenin being a liberal and/or progressive. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Recursion
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 06:30 PM Response to Reply #54 |
62. If Lenin wasn't on the "Left" where the hell was he? (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DeadEyeDyck
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 07:00 PM Response to Reply #62 |
72. got me there! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rex
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 07:09 PM Response to Reply #62 |
74. He believed in ruling by dictatorship. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 07:00 PM Response to Reply #42 |
71. Why not go back to the Aztecs? How about the Babylonians? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stevenleser
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 09:50 PM Response to Reply #42 |
97. They were not pundits. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kctim
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 03:38 PM Response to Original message |
6. Does calling for violence |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JuniperLea
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 07:13 PM Response to Reply #6 |
77. Yes... show me where you've seen that... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Octafish
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 08:26 PM Response to Reply #6 |
81. Of course. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AmandaRuth
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 03:41 PM Response to Original message |
7. people might point to Randy Rhodes (whom I adore) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 03:50 PM Response to Reply #7 |
13. The OP asked for examples, not names thrown out willy-nilly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AmandaRuth
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 03:59 PM Response to Reply #13 |
21. I'm sorry (really, not be sarcastic here, I am sorry) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RockaFowler
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 05:03 PM Response to Reply #7 |
46. Randy has never used violent rhetoric |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AmandaRuth
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 05:13 PM Response to Reply #46 |
47. I totally believe you, I don't listen |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mwb970
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 03:48 PM Response to Original message |
10. I've heard "both sides do it" 50 times in the last few days. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Octafish
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 11:02 PM Response to Reply #10 |
100. David Brooks is one to talk. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TBF
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 03:51 PM Response to Original message |
16. I can't even name a "left" pundit. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Johonny
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 03:59 PM Response to Reply #16 |
20. I agree, just can name a few people on the left |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blondeatlast
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 04:58 PM Response to Reply #16 |
43. Zing! +1. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 03:51 PM Response to Original message |
17. How about a Democratic Congressman? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kestrel91316
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 04:06 PM Response to Reply #17 |
25. Gosh, that certainly proves that 1 = 100! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 05:45 PM Response to Reply #25 |
50. The OP asked for a name - I gave him a name |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Octafish
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 09:04 PM Response to Reply #17 |
86. True, Paul E. Kanjorski was quoted in an editorial. He is not a regular pundit, however. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 09:53 PM Response to Reply #86 |
98. Do you understand what a real traitor is? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Octafish
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 10:45 PM Response to Reply #98 |
99. Yes. Why do you ask? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 11:05 PM Response to Reply #99 |
101. I suggest you read the Constitution - that is the only definition that counts. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Octafish
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 11:27 PM Response to Reply #101 |
105. Good one. Thanks! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gratuitous
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 03:53 PM Response to Original message |
18. All of them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 04:08 PM Response to Reply #18 |
28. Do you have quotes of a liberal pundit recommending blowing someone |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Old and In the Way
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 04:12 PM Response to Reply #28 |
30. Or Jesse Helms saying that Clinton would leave NC in a body bag |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 09:10 PM Response to Reply #30 |
89. Right, but he is a Republican, and when they do it, it's okay. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gratuitous
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 04:22 PM Response to Reply #28 |
32. They were calling for higher taxes on wealthy people! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 09:08 PM Response to Reply #32 |
88. Lol, sorry! Kneejerk reaction on my part. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gratuitous
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 09:44 PM Response to Reply #88 |
95. Guilty of it myself from time to time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Octafish
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 04:32 PM Response to Reply #28 |
34. I believe the poster is making a point through satire. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 09:05 PM Response to Reply #34 |
87. Oops, now I am embarrassed ! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
denem
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 03:53 PM Response to Original message |
19. Barack Obama : 'You don't bring a knife to a gun fight' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kestrel91316
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 04:07 PM Response to Reply #19 |
26. A self-defense metaphor hardly counts. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Old and In the Way
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 04:09 PM Response to Reply #19 |
29. A Sean Connery quote from the movie. "The Untouchables" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
denem
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 04:36 PM Response to Reply #29 |
35. Which Barack used when questioned. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EOTE
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 04:55 PM Response to Reply #35 |
41. And you consider that a call for violence? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JoePhilly
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 05:00 PM Response to Reply #35 |
44. The best you can do? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
denem
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 05:48 PM Response to Reply #44 |
52. No . It's an example of firearm rhetoric |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JoePhilly
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 05:57 PM Response to Reply #52 |
56. And a WEAK example it is ... in part because ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheKentuckian
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 06:51 PM Response to Reply #35 |
67. You aren't that dense, even at absolute face value the words are a reponse to violence |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blondeatlast
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 05:01 PM Response to Reply #19 |
45. That's a movie quote (Untouchables). This adult can comprehend the difference. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LanternWaste
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 05:15 PM Response to Reply #19 |
48. Much like your post... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Old and In the Way
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 04:05 PM Response to Original message |
24. I can't think of any. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Octafish
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 08:51 PM Response to Reply #24 |
82. "(W)ho will...oppose these fascists if it means you and/or your loved ones are in their gun sites?'' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 04:08 PM Response to Original message |
27. How about this from a Democratic Rep: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JoePhilly
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 06:01 PM Response to Reply #27 |
59. If Obama "pals around with terrorists" ... wouldn't you be justified to kill him? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Midway Rebel
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 04:16 PM Response to Original message |
31. Well, there was this one ugly incident. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Octafish
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 11:13 PM Response to Reply #31 |
102. Is that Anita Bryant? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
upi402
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 04:47 PM Response to Original message |
39. Please Octafish, tone down this hysterical rhetoric! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Octafish
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-11 11:58 AM Response to Reply #39 |
110. Why do they call it HATE Radio? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OneGrassRoot
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 04:52 PM Response to Original message |
40. Here's a list posted on my FB wall... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OneGrassRoot
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 05:30 PM Response to Reply #40 |
49. Wow, that's weird.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NYC Liberal
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 05:47 PM Response to Reply #49 |
51. Hm do you have any formatting code around them or anything? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OneGrassRoot
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 06:22 PM Response to Reply #51 |
61. Nothing visible. I literally copied and pasted... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dappleganger
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 06:52 PM Response to Reply #61 |
68. Yes, it's a good idea to use a text editor |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OneGrassRoot
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 11:22 PM Response to Reply #68 |
103. Okay, let's see if this works: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JustFiveMoreMinutes
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 05:56 PM Response to Reply #40 |
55. These are great... spit/knock/slap.. I'd just throw away |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DonCoquixote
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 05:49 PM Response to Original message |
53. Ted Rall |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JustFiveMoreMinutes
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 05:58 PM Response to Reply #53 |
58. In this thread? I missed it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DonCoquixote
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 07:05 PM Response to Reply #58 |
73. here ya go |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JustFiveMoreMinutes
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 07:11 PM Response to Reply #73 |
75. I don't even like his cartoons... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DonCoquixote
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 07:32 PM Response to Reply #75 |
78. point made |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alp227
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 06:30 PM Response to Original message |
63. during the tax cut debate of 2010: 2 Democratic senators decided to pump up their words |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dappleganger
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 06:53 PM Response to Reply #63 |
69. Yet another reason why I love Thom and Rachel... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zax2me
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 06:36 PM Response to Original message |
65. Does calling for a revolution count? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 06:58 PM Response to Reply #65 |
70. What about the OP's word "pundit" did you not get? And going back about a half-century? Jeez. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JustFiveMoreMinutes
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 07:13 PM Response to Reply #65 |
76. 60s? Well we'll see you that and raise you one Kent State! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fascisthunter
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 07:41 PM Response to Original message |
80. Well, I Guess NOT! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
H2O Man
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 08:56 PM Response to Original message |
84. Recommended. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueCheese
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 09:28 PM Response to Original message |
91. Keith Olbermann |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stevenleser
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 09:49 PM Response to Reply #91 |
96. We're doing pretty well if that is the most you can find. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kudzu22
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 11:32 PM Response to Original message |
106. Dbl post |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kudzu22
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 11:34 PM Response to Original message |
107. Craig Kilborn on the Late Late show |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mika
![]() |
Mon Jan-10-11 11:38 PM Response to Original message |
108. Socialism is a conservative ideology. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
samsingh
![]() |
Tue Jan-11-11 11:52 AM Response to Original message |
109. nope |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 06:40 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC