I see that the washington post claims that AZ has "what is considered one of the most progressive mental health laws in the country" because "Any person, including any of the students in Loughner's classes who exchanged worried emails about his strange actions or any of his teachers who sought to have him removed or who wanted him to receive treatment, could have petitioned the court to have him evaluated for mental illness."
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/44/2011/01/jared-loughners-behavior-never.htmlWith all do respect, bullshit.
"Progressive" mental health care allows people to remain in their home, or in the homes of loved ones, while recovering. Progressive mental health allows for people to receive treatment regardless of ability to pay. Progressive mental health treatment is all about providing recovery based services in a compassionate, non-judgmental environment.
If you want to see what progressive MH care looks like, take a look at the city of Geel (Gheel), Belgium. If you want to see progressive care in America, look at any movement that stresses de-institutionalization. As far as I know, the state of Arizona ain't no leader in "progressive mental health care". All the AZ mental health law does is make it easy to harass people that are culturally or socially different, imho. Where is the "progress" in that?