Freeps scratch their heads, yet somehow still high-five "Madame President" for "Blood Libel" fatwa

[Amerigo Vespucci]

Palin Calls Criticism ‘Blood Libel’

***

To: reaganaut1

Blood libel? Wierd way of putting it. That normally applies to an ethnic group.

2 posted on Wednesday, January 12, 2011 5:45:52 AM by Natufian (t)

***

To: reaganaut1

Remember, the MSM is out to “Kill” Conservatives. Katie Couric, Andrea Mitchell, Diane Sawyer, Brian Williams, Paul Krugman, or anybody from the NY Times. This shooting is but another example of thousands that demonstrate the intense hatred of the MSM of our cause. They will try anything to censor and destroy our movement. They went after Reagan, they went after George Bush, and as soon as Sarah Palin was nominated they went after her. They want to censor talk radio and that is all we have to make our voices heard.

5 posted on Wednesday, January 12, 2011 5:48:11 AM by mfish13 (ELECTIONS HAVE CONSEQUENCES!!!!)

***

To: reaganaut1

I .... wow... I am literally shaking! WOW That just blew my mind!

We are witnessing history!

Palin stands alone against the liberal horde... and WINS!

Well... she wont stand alone anymore! Because I will stand with her to the end!

GOD BLESS SARAH PALIN!

6 posted on Wednesday, January 12, 2011 5:48:20 AM by TexasFreeper2009 (Obama = Epic Fail)

***

To: Natufian

“Blood libel? Wierd way of putting it. That normally applies to an ethnic group.”

Partially correct - “Blood libel” refers to the medieval Christian accusation that Jews killed Christian children and used their blood for matzos. But, today it is often used to describe False Accusations, which is the way Sarah used it.

9 posted on Wednesday, January 12, 2011 5:53:20 AM by NavyCanDo

***

To: reaganaut1

Here we go!! Palins dignified statement concerning the horrific acts of a madman and the disgusting behavior
of the left in trying to cash in on the tragedy will be boiled down to two descriptive words of their attempted assignment of blame and attacked !!

10 posted on Wednesday, January 12, 2011 5:53:29 AM by timetostand (Ya say ya wanna revolution -- OK!)

***

To: reaganaut1

Anyone else get the impression, watching this video, that Palin is FAR more Presidential than that loser who actually IS President?

12 posted on Wednesday, January 12, 2011 5:54:21 AM by Pravious

***

To: Natufian

She has been libeled. Which I know is almost impossible to prove against a ‘public figure.’ Yet, she was specifically mentioned (repeatedly) by name...WITH NO EVIDENCE THAT THE ACTUAL PERP EVER READ HER WORKS OR FOLLOWED HER POLITICS.

The quote, ‘blood libel’ maybe the new ‘death panel.’

Well done, Madame President.

15 posted on Wednesday, January 12, 2011 5:55:48 AM by PennsylvaniaMom ('We are coming out of our trance, we are coming out of our nightmare...' <3Michele Bachmann)

[HughBeaumont]

1. Yeah, that's just too much stupid to absorb.

From the assertion that Katie Couric, Andrea Mitchell, Diane Sawyer and Brian Williams are left-leaning to the assertion that they "went after Reagan and Bush" (yeah, when was this? They couldn't trip over themselves fast enough to defend either joker as the world was crumbling around them, especially Faux, ABC, CNN and CNBC) to "Anyone else get the impression, watching this video, that Palin is FAR more Presidential than that loser who actually IS President?".

Too much. Yeah, that's the ticket. Put the Quitternor in office. You'll be fighting your fellow Chairbornes for bridge space.

[el_bryanto]

2. Liberal Hordes? Wierd way of putting it. That normally applies to mongols.

Do Liberals have those furry hats and curvy swords?

Bryant

[nxylas]

3. No, but we should

Furry hats and curvy swords ftw.

[Kali]

7. furry cats and curvy words is more like it

:rofl:

[pscot]

8. I got mine at Amazon

All I need now is a pony.

[Ilsa]

4. Republican Diane Sawyer? She worked in the Nixon Administration. nt

[Raschel]

5. Clueless Freeper: she was specifically mentioned because crosshairs map+ Rep Giffords targeted on

map + Rep Giffords speakin of danger of map + Rep Giffords shot = specific connection.

[XanaDUer]

6. You so know these FR dudes are using lots of tissue and hand lotion over Sarah

I just woke up (dog was sick most of the night) and now I see Our Dear Sarah is embroiled in yet another imbroglio. Yet, according to the Freeps, they will stand by her, and she has won against the liberal hordes!

[Motown_Johnny]

9. "Blood Libel" may be the new "Death Panel"

If he/she means something completely distorted and dishonest that has a short term impact but eventually is exposed then I just may agree with this Freep

[lovemydog]

11. you said it better than me

So true!

[lovemydog]

10. that poster is ignorant

Diane Sawyer and Katie Couric and everyone at the NY Times are 'out to kill conservatism'? Yeesh. They're all pretty conservative. Judith Miller wrote for the NY Times when it was publishing stories supporting Bush administration claims. This was at the critical time prior to the vote on the war in Iraq.

Promoting the 'blood libel' claim'? They don't understand (or care) how wrong that claim is. And how offensive it is to anyone familiar with Jewish history. It's illuminating that the one poster who likens it to the term 'death panels' doesn't care that it's ignorant.

Willful ignorance.

[marmar]

12. 'The quote, ‘blood libel’ maybe the new ‘death panel.’ ...Well done, Madame President'.

A strong argument for universal mental health care.