America's mainstream press is so polite, so scared. At least the overseas papers know when to call "bullshit" during coverage of the Jared Loughner saga. Sarah Palin's claim of being a victim of "blood libel"
http://blogs.villagevoice.com/runninscared/2011/01/sarah_palin_is.php is so ludicrous as to defy belief. Or as Damian Thompson, blogs editor of the Telegraph (U.K.), says in a headline, "Seriously, this woman is nuts."
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/damianthompson/100071625/sarah-palin-accuses-her-critics-of-blood-libel-seriously-this-woman-is-nuts/Hey, Palin! "Blood libel" --
http://www.religioustolerance.org/jud_blib2.htm a phrase usually used these days only by Muslim fanatics --
http://www.snopes.com/religion/blood.asp is the centuries-old myth of Jews' sacrificing Christian babies and drinking their blood. (The Washington Post treats Palin's stupidity with kid gloves. C'mon, you're better than that.)
http://onfaith.washingtonpost.com/onfaith/undergod/2011/01/blood_libel_social_sin_and_sarah_palin.htmlWe all know how popular vampire tales are these days, but how many ways can Palin be wrong here? For starters, she's not smart enough to be Jewish.
http://blogs.villagevoice.com/runninscared/2011/01/sarah_palins_mo.php