DU was right. Sarah Palin would claim SHE is the victim of the Tucson Terrorist.

[Democrats_win]

Of course that prediction isn't a big deal because she ALWAYS plays the victim. She's done will with the victim card because she's now a millionaire.

[no limit]

1. Do you think Palin was in any way responsible for this shooting?

Because many people here do.

[Democrats_win]

4. The evidence is greater than Bush had when he went to war in Iraq.

I'd prefer that our politicians be more respectful. It's ok to attack specific things but the things said are very close to hate speech. Of course hate speech is legal but should not be tolerated in our elected officials--they need to get along.

[no limit]

7. So you have evidance that this guy was motivated by Palin?

Because in Bush's case he cherry picked evidance to support his claims. In this case I don't believe any such evidance exists unless you know something that the rest of us don't. By all means please share it.

[robdogbucky]

9. Spellcheck is your friend

Evidence, not evidance.

Painful to read your posts

[no limit]

10. Thanks for answering my question.

Also an FYI: It's spell check, not spellcheck. So when you belittle someone because they didn't use a spell checker it would be a good idea to use one yourself.

[Amerigo Vespucci]

2. I think James Taylor said it best...

And when you give me that pretty little pout
It turns me inside out
There's something about you, baby (I don't know)

:rofl:

[Fuzz]

5. Does she have that flag in her house?

[Crankie Avalon]

3. Well, she is the ultimate victim of all this, after all...

...Also turns out she was the TRUE victim when Jews were being accused of drinking the blood of Christian infants back in the Middle Ages. Haven't you heard? LORD, how this woman has suffered!

[Raschel]

8. +1

[fishwax]

6. yep -- no surprise there