Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Independents hated the president’s debt deal, a new poll shows

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Mr Deltoid Donating Member (694 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-02-11 02:39 PM
Original message
Independents hated the president’s debt deal, a new poll shows
'Obama’s Team Is Blowing It'

We were told, as I recall, that Barack Obama had to seek a debt deal with the Republicans to please independent voters. Well, the independent voters are speaking, and they don’t appear to be especially appeased. There’s a new Gallup poll just out showing that independent voters hate the deal. Their views on it are far more similar to the GOP’s than to the Democratic Party’s. Combine these data with the president’s approval numbers, which are swiftly heading south, and we have little choice but to conclude that this brilliant stratagem backfired. Isn’t it time for someone to say: this new White House political team is worse than the previous one?

First let me run you through the numbers. Americans disapprove of the deal by 46 to 39 percent. Democrats support it 58-28. Republicans oppose it 26-64. Independents oppose it 33-50. A second question asked of respondents: Was the deal a step forward or backward or neither with respect to “addressing the federal debt situation?” Democrats lined up 30-14-50. Republicans, 15-28-52. Independents, 16-25-50. Finally, independents also align more closely with Republicans on the question of whether the deal will have a good or bad effect on the economy. Whereas 29 percent of Democrats think the effect will be good, just 12 percent of independents and 8 percent of Republicans believe that.

The White House strategy failed, and it failed pretty spectacularly. It reminds me that I’m hard pressed to think of a White House strategy that hasn’t failed in the last several months. The springtime budget negotiation, the one where a government shutdown was narrowly averted and Obama bragged about overseeing the biggest single-year domestic spending cut in history, was a failure too; a success, one supposes, in the sense that the government did not shut down, but another situation in which Obama’s back was pressed to the wall by congressional Republicans.

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2011/08/25/president-obama-s-political-team-is-blowing-it.html

It's time to come back into the light Mr President, before it's too late.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-02-11 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. He didn't "seek a debt deal" to please anyone. The Repubs would not raise the debt ceiling,
forcing a deal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Harmony Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-02-11 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. I don't understand
Democrats backed him on this issue, Independents backed him on this issue, and some Republicans who didn't want to see the stock market tumble backed him on this issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-02-11 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. I'm not sure what you don't understand. He didn't want to default--that would have been
economically bad. As it was, it was still economically bad anyway, just the negotiations themselves, since we look like a banana republic now and S&P lowered the credit rating. The whole episode damaged him politically, he knows that--that was the whole goal of the GOP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-02-11 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #4
13. And that would mean something if it were being submitted to a public vote. It wasn't.
Instead, it was required to pass through the House of Representatives, which is dominated by a majority of right-wing Republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-02-11 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. That was the story his campaign people put out the week
Edited on Fri Sep-02-11 03:28 PM by EFerrari
before the debt deal was foisted on us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-02-11 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. His campaign people have the task of spinning everything in the best possible light.
That is what I expect them to do--that's what all politicians do. That doesn't mean I don't see what I see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-02-11 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Yes. And so I expect you see through the default bs
Edited on Fri Sep-02-11 03:31 PM by EFerrari
because no one was going to allow the US to default. Wall Street wouldn't stand for it. On the day the rhetorical fakery was the most dire and heated, bonds didn't even blink.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-02-11 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Now that, I don't know. I think these people are that nutz.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-02-11 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. They are nutz but they're not stupid and they don't stay in power
by screwing Wall Street.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-02-11 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. Your opinion depends on the unstated belief that the Republicans are reasonable people.
Who just want what's best for America, and have different ways of going about it.

As a matter of fact, that's the unstated belief behind almost all the claims that Obama should just stare down Congress, despite ample evidence that the Republicans are happy to let the world burn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-02-11 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #9
22. so now all the independents are assholes. anyone who doesn't
praise him is an asshole. Good luck getting re-elected with that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-02-11 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #1
17. The President held all the cards..
yet he folded.

It was terrible politics, stupid economics.

He missed a major opportunity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-02-11 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. He really didn't. The House had the task of raising the debt ceiling, and
they said they wouldn't do it without cuts. Were they bluffing, would a veto have resulted in a better situation? We'll never know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-02-11 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #19
29. He really did.
He could have threatened to use the Constitutional option, used coin seigniorage or gone with Ron Paul's solution. There was absolutely no need to pander to the teabag contingency.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-02-11 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #1
21. he told them at a press conference the lowest he would go. wtf?
you don't tell the other side the lowest position you will take because they will go there and lower. I can't tell you have that rings like a bell in my brain to this day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-02-11 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
2. The poor delicate flower was forced into it by those meanies. Of course, he could've vetoed it.
But, that would've required courage and principles and all that silly stuff that aren't "reality based".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fearless Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-02-11 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. +100
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
COLGATE4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-02-11 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. + another 100!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-02-11 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #2
16. Yes, veto it, because it's been too long since America had bread lines!
And because 50% unemployment is just fucking AWESOME.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-02-11 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Whereas, caving to the Republicans (again, as usual) saved us from that..or, did it?
We'll never know if the Republicans would've have caved or made a better deal because Obama wouldn't take a risk and folded.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jeff47 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-02-11 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #16
26. You're acting like their austerity plan isn't already sending us in that direction. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-02-11 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
7. "It's time to come back into the light Mr President"
The questuin is...was he ever in it...really?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-02-11 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
8. Duh. Unless he's cognitively impaired, he didn't do it for them
because independents are not focused on the debt but on jobs and have been since 2010 midterms. The independent story is bs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jeff47 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-02-11 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #8
27. The justification behind caving on the debt deal was it would please independents.
At least, that's what the Obama supporters shouted whenever anyone objected to the caving.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-02-11 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #27
30. I heard Thom tell that story the day the idea was leaked by the White House.
It made no sense when he said it and of course, it never did or will make any sense. There is nothing in austerity that pleases independents. They all want to work just like we do and that's what they care about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
coalition_unwilling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-02-11 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
20. OT slightly, but who in his or her right mind would consider him- or
herself an "Independent" these days? Methinks so-called 'independents' classify themselves as such because they are ashamed of the horrors of the Bush admin. So they say they're 'Independent' but really they're Repuke through and through.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-02-11 04:41 PM
Response to Original message
23. This is more an indicator of Republican messaging than anything else.
The old "if you say something often enough people will believe it's true."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-02-11 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
24. Sigh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MilesColtrane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-02-11 04:49 PM
Response to Original message
25. The author takes the assumption of another writer, that the debt deal was...
negotiated for the votes it could glean, and runs with it.

That makes me take anything else he says in the article with a dump truck of salt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnaries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-02-11 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #25
28. Exactly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 05:00 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC